Colleges

APR scores put 3 dozen teams' postseasons at risk

Posted May 14, 2014

Tevin Baskin (1) drives to the basket during the Campbell University vs. Appalachian State NCAA basketball game, Friday, November 16, 2012 in Buies Creek, NC.

Thirty-six Division I athletic teams will face postseason bans next fall because of sub-par scores on the NCAA's annual Academic Progress Rate.

Seventeen of those teams play either football or men's basketball. Last year, 17 teams in all faced postseason bans because of poor academic results.

The APR is billed as a real-time measurement for all teams and is based on a points-system that rewards athletes for staying academically eligible and staying in school.

This year's four-year measurements, released Wednesday, cover the period from 2009-10 through 2012-13. The report shows a two-point improvement among all athletes, going from 974 to 976. A perfect score is 1,000.

The University of North Carolina had 18 sports with a four-year APR of 980 or higher. Six programs scored a perfect score, women’s fencing, women’s golf, gymnastics, rowing, women’s tennis and volleyball. UNC’s overall average for all sports for the past four years was 979.

Both Tar Heel football and basketball have trended downwards over the past four years, football went from a 955 score in the 2009-10 season to a 938 in 2012-13. UNC basketball fell from a 985 to a 938.

“Some of our teams can do better and are working diligently at improving their scores,” said UNC athletic director Bubba Cunningham. "Sports that have professional opportunities and those that have fewer people on the roster are a challenge because their APRs can fluctuate easily based on the results of just a few people. But overall we are pleased with the majority of the scores and congratulate the students and coaches for their commitment to academic achievement.”

Eight Duke University varsity athletics programs registered a perfect 1000 score. The Duke football and men’s basketball squads were two of the school’s teams to earn the highest APR scores among ACC institutions in conference-sponsored sports. Duke led the way in football with a score of 992, while the men’s basketball squad was tops in the league with 995 points.

Teams that play in the five power conferences - the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC - had a two-point overall increase over the previous year, 980 to 982. That's up four points from two years ago, and the number of teams in those leagues falling short of the 930 cutline, which triggers penalties, dropped from 6 percent in 2010-11 to 5 percent in 2011-12 to 3 percent in 2012-13.

While teams in the other Division I leagues had a one-point overall increase from 2011-12, from 976 to 977, and a four-point improvement from two years ago, 8 percent of those teams have still not reached the score of 930 - no change from 2011-12.

And of the 17 football and men's basketball teams facing the harshest sanctions, eight are historically black colleges - including the only two schools to face postseason bans in both sports: Alabama State and Florida A&M.

Arkansas-Pine Bluff, Idaho, Mississippi Valley State, Prairie View A&M, St. Francis (Pennsylvania), Savannah State and UNLV will also be prohibited from postseason action in football. Four of the schools on the banned list play in the 10-team Southwestern Athletic Conference.

Appalachian State, Central Arkansas, Houston Baptist, Lamar, San Jose State, Wisconsin-Milwaukee, along with Alabama State and Florida A&M will be kept out of the NCAA's men's basketball tournament, too.

The report also shows transfers in Division I men's basketball have increased significantly over each of the last four years. The percentage of players going from one four-year school to another jumped from 10.0 in 2009-10 to 10.6 percent in 2010-11 to 11.9 percent in 2011-12 and now sits at 13. 1 percent.

Meanwhile, the percentage of college football players changing four-year schools was just 3.7 percent in 2012-13.

ACC teams continue to make grade

Athletic teams from Atlantic Coast Conference institutions continue to be among the top percentage of those at Division I colleges and universities that meet standards and excel academically, as reflected by Academic Progress Rate (APR) data released by the NCAA on Wednesday.

Division I institutions are held accountable for the academic progress of their student-athletes through the APR, a team-based metric that accounts for the eligibility and retention of each student-athlete, each term.

The Committee on Academic Performance oversees the Academic Performance Program, which sets policies and recommends legislative changes to the Board of Directors, which has the final say on rules changes in Division I.

Beginning with 2012-13 championships, teams were required to post a minimum 900 four-year average APR or a 930 average over the most recent two years to be eligible to participate. For 2014-15 championships, teams must earn a 930 four-year average APR or a 940 average over the most recent two years to participate in championships. In 2015-16 and beyond, teams must earn a four-year APR of 930 to compete in championships.

ACC Highlights include:
• All 59 ACC football, men’s basketball, women’s basketball and baseball programs exceeded the required 930 APR average
• 10 women’s basketball teams are above the 973 national APR average
• 9 men’s basketball teams are above the national 957 APR average
• 11 baseball teams are above the Division I 967 APR average
• 12 football teams are above the FBS 956 APR average
• Louisville, which joins the ACC on July 1, 2014, achieved a perfect 1,000 APR score
• No ACC teams are subject to APR penalties for the third straight year

The ACC’s strong showing comes one week after 77 league teams received APR recognition awards, the most of any Power 5 conference.

21 Comments

Please to add a comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • 45HEELSFAN45 May 15, 2014

    The 2013/14 school year is over but not included in these numbers. I'm sure they already have an idea what their score will be when released next year. Bubba didn't sound too worried from the articles I've read, but there is room for improvement.

  • heelsforever May 15, 2014

    Don't worry Heel fans, the Swof will fix this with his almighty powers.

  • jjackflash1966 May 15, 2014

    View quoted thread

    Ignorant comment on your part. See reply to BlueDevils00 for some enlightenment. Of course, had you read all of this BEFORE you posted, you could've saved yourself from embarrassment.

  • Riddickfield May 15, 2014

    So unc's scores have been going down steadily the last 4 year. Gee, what happened 4 years ago that may have caused this?

  • one May 15, 2014

    How did you arrove at that conclusion? You've left me speakless.

    View quoted thread

  • Bo Hart May 15, 2014

    It just constantly eats at you haters the fact that UNC was,is,and always will be the flagship of NC . You have one julius peppers moment to jump on in the history of the school . get over it people !!

  • jjackflash1966 May 15, 2014

    View quoted thread

    - Actually, you're ignorant to the facts. UNC was trending downward already, when 3 and/or all 4 of the years averaged were before the discovery of Nyang'oro's fraud & his removal. This latest score represents two years that were "Nyang'oro years" & two years after his removal. UNC's scores in the 2009-10 calendar year were at their all-time low & will be coming off the 4-year avg score next year. Also, 2012-13 year alone show a marked improvement in football, so expect a huge jump in UNC's APR score next May.

  • caniac87 May 15, 2014

    View quoted thread



    Now you know the folks over at UNC don't care anything about facts. It hurts their narrative that everyone is out to get them when, in fact, the media has actually been really easy on them considering the state of things over there.

  • Barely May 15, 2014

    View quoted thread


    It's kind of hard to be worse than "Worst APR in the ACC."

  • caniac87 May 15, 2014

    View quoted thread



    Here's an idea... If UNC would increase their scores, WRAL wouldn't have to report how poor they are. Then you could have positive press like Duke, who keeps their APR up and still finds a way to be highly competitive.

More...

 

 

  • ACC: Wake Forest at Duke

    Tonight at 8:00 on WRAL-TV

  • ACC: Syracuse at NC State

    Saturday at 12:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • SEC: Florida at Kentucky

    Saturday at 2:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • Pac 12: Stanford at Arizona

    Saturday at 4:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • ACC: Duke vs. Wake Forest

    Tonight at 8:00 on 620am

  • Big Ten: Wisconsin at Minnesota

    Tomorrow at 7:00 pm on 99.9 The Fan

  • NBA: Dallas at Portland

    Tomorrow at 9:30 pm on 99.9 The Fan

  • NHL: Hurricanes vs. Minnesota

    Friday at 8:00 pm on 99.9 The Fan

Scoreboard
Local
Final
CHA 104
LAL 103
Final
GT 49
UNC 81
Final
CLEM 61
NCSU 66
7:30pm Tonight
BRK
CHA
 
8:00pm Tonight
DUKE
WAKE
 
Final
DET 15
BAL 2
 
Final
MIA 7
MIAFLA 1
 
Final
PHI 5
NYY 5
 
Final
BOS 2
NEASTERN 1
 
Final
TOR 7
PIT 8
 
Final
CIN 10
CLE 0
 
Final
OAK 9
SFG 4
 
Final
BOS 1
BOSTONCOLL 0
 
Final
ARI 4
ASU 0
 
1:05pm Today
BAL
DET
 
1:05pm Today
ATL
NYM
 
1:05pm Today
NYY
PHI
 
1:05pm Today
PIT
TOR
 
3:05pm Today
LOS
CWS
 
3:05pm Today
CLE
CIN
 
3:05pm Today
TEX
KAN
 
3:05pm Today
SFG
OAK
 
3:05pm Today
SEA
SDP
 
3:05pm Today
MIL
WMIL
 
3:10pm Today
COL
ARI
 
7:05pm Tonight
MIN
UMIN
 
Final
CLE 110
BOS 79
Final
CHA 104
LAL 103
Final
NYK 86
SAC 124
Final
ATL 104
HOU 96
Final
MEM 82
UTA 93
Final
CHI 97
WAS 92
Final
DEN 106
MIL 95
7:00pm Tonight
ORL
PHO
 
7:30pm Tonight
BRK
CHA
 
7:30pm Tonight
TOR
CLE
 
7:30pm Tonight
BOS
UTA
 
8:00pm Tonight
MIN
DEN
 
8:00pm Tonight
NOP
DET
 
8:00pm Tonight
MIA
LAL
 
8:00pm Tonight
HOU
MEM
 
8:00pm Tonight
OKC
PHI
 
8:30pm Tonight
SAN
SAC
 
10:30pm Tonight
GSW
MIL
 
10:30pm Tonight
LAC
POR
 
Final
UMO 70
AKR 63
 
Final
NAVY 56
ARMY 52
 
Final
BST 60
EMICH 67
 
Final
BUT 54
GEOR 60
Final
IND 63
IOWA 77
Final
FLGC 81
JVU 63
 
Final
USCU 90
KNST 54
 
Final
BGU 80
KSU 81
 
Final
NKENTUCKY 73
LIP 76
 
Final
HC 62
GHND 45
 
Final
RUTG 50
MD 60
Final
GT 49
UNC 81
Final
BUF 93
OHIO 66
 
Final
ALA 74
MISS 82
Final
DAY 75
RIU 59
Final
CMICH 85
TOL 77
 
Final
DET 77
YOUNG 67
Final
UNF 81
STET 67
 
Final
ABCHRIST 83
HOUB 71
 
Final
NDAK 78
NEOM 80
 
Final
NILL 65
WMICH 63
 
Final
ILLCH 60
WRST 57
Final
MIZZ 63
AUB 61
Final
UGA 64
KENT 72
Final
NW 82
MICH 78
Final
CLEM 61
NCSU 66
Final
UF 66
TEXAM 62
Final
KU 76
WVU 69
Final
CREI 72
VILL 76
12:00pm Today
PBY
LONG
 
2:00pm Today
GWEBB
CAMP
 
6:00pm Tonight
UNCA
LIB
 
6:00pm Tonight
PSU
OSU
 
7:00pm Tonight
USB
BING
 
7:00pm Tonight
FORD
DUQ
 
7:00pm Tonight
GMAS
GWU
 
7:00pm Tonight
UNH
HART
 
7:00pm Tonight
STJOE
LAS
 
7:00pm Tonight
Terriers
LIU
 
7:00pm Tonight
GTDNS
MAINE
 
7:00pm Tonight
LOU
ND
 
7:00pm Tonight
SHU
PROV
 
7:00pm Tonight
BRY
SHU
 
7:00pm Tonight
MORE
SEMIZ
 
7:00pm Tonight
MNTER
RFLSH
 
7:00pm Tonight
LSU
TENN
 
7:00pm Tonight
SFLA
UCF
 
7:00pm Tonight
VERM
UMBC
 
7:00pm Tonight
RMU
WAGN
 
7:30pm Tonight
UMASS
RICH
 
8:00pm Tonight
TULA
HOU
 
8:00pm Tonight
YALE
HOW
 
8:00pm Tonight
PITT
MIAMI
 
8:00pm Tonight
TXPA
NMST
 
8:00pm Tonight
MSU
PURD
 
8:00pm Tonight
STLU
BONA
 
8:00pm Tonight
DUKE
WAKE
 
9:00pm Tonight
TULSA
CIN
 
9:00pm Tonight
VANDY
MSST
 
9:00pm Tonight
EILL
SIUE
 
9:00pm Tonight
MARQ
STJ
 
9:00pm Tonight
OKST
TCU
 
9:00pm Tonight
UCLA
USC
 
9:00pm Tonight
WYO
UTST
 
10:00pm Tonight
FRES
AFA
 
10:00pm Tonight
SJST
BSU
 
10:00pm Tonight
NEV
COLST
 
10:00pm Tonight
ILL
NEB
 
11:00pm Tonight
ORST
OREG
 
11:00pm Tonight
UNLV
SDST
 
11:59pm Tonight
HAW
UCSB
 
Final
PHI 2
CAL 3
Final
NJD 3
NAS 1
Final
CLB 3
WAS 5
Final
TAM 3
BUF 0
Final
FLA 2
TOR 3
Final
MIN 3
OTT 2
Final
DAL 3
NYI 2
Final
ARI 1
ANA 4
Final
VAN 2
SJS 6
Final
EDM 2
LOS 5
7:30pm Tonight
WIN
OTT
 
8:00pm Tonight
DET
NYR
 
10:00pm Tonight
ANA
MON
 
10:00pm Tonight
COL
PIT