banner
Caulton Tudor

Autonomy movement at hand for ACC & partners

Posted August 4, 2014

Barring a sudden schedule change, the process to initiate athletic autonomy for the ACC and four other college conferences will be sanctioned by the NCAA’s board of directors on Thursday.

That the board will give its permission to this historic and sweeping landscape change is a virtual given. But where the movement goes next – and at what speed – isn’t clear at all. ACC commissioner John Swofford said on July 20 that he anticipates a quick pace.

After Thursday’s vote by the NCAA, the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC and Pacific-12 will have until Oct. 1 to present a definitive agenda.

Three of those changes are all but certain:

1. Full-cost of living scholarships, a move that likely will require the involved schools to invest an additional $2 million to $5 million annually in their scholarship budgets.

2. Four-year scholarship guarantees. Under the current policy, athletic scholarships are annual agreements between the school and player, running from July 1 through June 30.

3. Long-term medical insurance security, which will require another huge financial investment by the schools. This aspect of autonomy will be among the most complex to negotiate.

Dozens of questions and plan options will have to be researched in depth, not to mention terms of coverage and medical expense limits.

Some of the ramifications of the autonomy movement cannot be known until at least 2-3 years after the changes are officially implemented. The earliest that could happen would be for the 2015-16 school year.

Will scholarship limits change?

The assumption among the leagues not included at this point is that it will be become significantly more difficult for those leagues and schools to successfully recruit.

On paper, that theory makes sense.

After all, if a school in one of the so-called “Big Five” leagues can offer a grant worth two or three thousand dollars more annually, why would a scholarship offer from an outsider even be considered?

That also makes sense, but remember that the NCAA limit on scholarships per sport hasn’t changed – yet. In football, that limit is still 85 total grants – the same total for Clemson and Florida State of the ACC as for ECU and Central Florida of the AAC.

But that raises another concern among the non Big Fivers. What would happen if increased scholarship limits eventually would be included under the autonomy umbrella? That could lead to an arms war the schools with smaller bank accounts probably could never win.

Most fans don’t recall it, but there was a time when the NCAA had no scholarship limits. There were years in the 1960s and ‘70s when some of the football factory schools had up to 120-150 players on scholarships regularly. It was routine for Nebraska to bring in 40-45 scholarship football players during that era.

As late as 1977, current ACC member Pitt had 130 scholarship football players.

The movement to reduce scholarships didn’t begin in earnest until late in the 1970s, when NCAA member schools gradually voted to reduce the football limit from 110 players to 105, then to 95 and eventually the current 85.

NCAA schools set the limits in part to create a sustainable financial equation in football. But an even bigger factor was Title IX, a 1972 federal law that set in place a process to evenly distribute scholarship money between male and female athletes. 

Men’s non-revenue sports could suffer

Since that Title IX law hasn’t been rewritten and isn’t likely to be, the autonomy movement of 2014 can only go so far.

If football and basketball players are given extra spending money, the courts will demand that all other scholarship athletes get the same amount.

If Big Five league schools want to increase football scholarship numbers, a corresponding increase would have take place in women’s sports.

But another option could be reducing the scholarship investment in men’s sports other than football and basketball.

And that is something we very well could see some day – a college sports world in which there are only three or four scholarship men sports and a dozen or more female sports.

NCAA rules presently allow for the following men’s sports limits: baseball (11.7 scholarships); basketball (13); track/cross country, lacrosse (12.6); swimming, wrestling, soccer (9.9); golf, tennis, volleyball, water polo and fencing (4.5); ice hockey (18); skiing, gymnastics (6.3) and rifle (3.6).

For women, it’s basketball (15 scholarships); track/cross country (18); field hockey, volleyball, softball, gymnastics, rugby and lacrosse (12); ice hockey (18); rowing (20); swimming and soccer (14); tennis and water polo (8); skiing (7); beach volleyball and golf (6), fencing (5), equestrian (15), bowling (5).

Schools can pick, play and pay from the menu as they choose, but the annual scholarship payroll has to even out among men and women. If the football scholarship price tag increases enough, it’s entirely possible that some schools would elect to offset the increase by dropping other men’s sports.

But one thing we are very unlikely to see is any sort of radical change in the football pecking order, and that’s even with the growing playoff format.

The majority of the 65 schools in the “Big Five” conferences will have no more chance of winning a national football championship than they have now. That reality won’t change if the rank-and-file “Big Five” schools opt to pour millions more into the scholarship ante or if they do not.

5 Comments

Please to add a comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Jeanne Gunn Aug 10, 2014

    View quoted thread



    Good points, 'Nice. I was thinking that players should earn their scholarship each year. If a player knows they have the 4-year deal, they may not have the same incentive to perform at the highest level, and if they violate team rules and get kicked off, the coach is stuck with another vacancy.

  • uBnice Aug 5, 2014

    View quoted thread



    Coaches don't like those 4 year scholarships also. It inteferes with them being able to have the players they want. If a 4-year player got a career ending injury their freshman year then they were stuck with an occupied vacancy.

    New coaches may not want many of the players from the previous coaching staff. With 1 year scholarships, they could simply get rid of them. They simply would not offer them renewal.

    I can sympathize with the coaches since they are there win. The whole academic thing is a nuisance for them.

    But it is a good deal for players. But I bet coaches will find a way around it.

  • Jeanne Gunn Aug 5, 2014

    If the men's non-revenue sports get cut as a result of the extra spending money given to the football and basketball players, maybe things will come full circle and those non-revenue sports will become intramural sports?

    As for the immediate changes, I like the current system of giving one-year scholarships better than the proposed four-year schollys. The one-year scholarships offer more flexibility IMHO.

  • Ken D. Aug 4, 2014

    I would challenge the assertion that full cost of attendance stipends could add as much as $5 million to athletic budgets. The ACC school that gives the most scholarships now is BC. If they increased the value of every scholarship by $4K a year it would add less that $2 million a year to their budget. It would cost Florida State less than $1 million.

    For schools not in a power conference, I agree that a possible response would be to reduce the number of scholarships in men's non revenue sports. Those have maximums a school can give, but not minimums. They could simply sacrifice competitiveness in sports alumni don't care much about.

  • uBnice Aug 4, 2014

    "But one thing we are very unlikely to see is any sort of radical change in the football pecking order, and that’s even with the growing playoff format."

    Yeah, all the talk about paying players and the effect it will have with regards to power alignment should not be an issue because it is already like that.

    For example, Alabama football is greater than UNC-CH football in almost every aspect: revenues, facilities, coaches pay, etc.

    So, if given an Alabama full-ride vs a UNC-CH full-ride, which do you take?

    Just remember, power usually does not relinquish itself willingly. The changes we are seeing is because the NCAA has been challenged to change. And the fight has been ugly.

  • NASCAR: Folds of Honor 500 in Atlanta

    Tomorrow at 1:00 pm on FOX50

  • ACC: Syracuse at Duke

    Tonight at 7:00 on 620am

Scoreboard
Local
Final
UCF 66
ECU 71
Final
BC 79
NCSU 63
Final
MIAMI 64
UNC 73
2nd
NCCU 62
COOK 44
 
1st Intermission
NYI 1
CAR 1
 
7:00pm Tonight
DUKE
SYR
7:00pm Tonight
WAS
DET
7:30pm Tonight
MIA
ATL
7:30pm Tonight
NYK
TOR
8:00pm Tonight
MIN
MEM
8:30pm Tonight
DAL
BRK
9:00pm Tonight
UTA
MIL
9:00pm Tonight
PHO
SAN
Final
LIP 94
KNST 75
 
Final
GHND 47
NAVY 57
 
Final
LAF 74
ARMY 64
 
Final
AMER 69
BUCK 71
 
Final
UCF 66
ECU 71
Final
STJ 81
GEOR 70
Final
CLEM 70
GT 63
Final
COL 61
LEH 55
 
Final
FSU 59
LOU 81
Final
MD 66
MICH 56
Final
UGA 68
MIZZ 44
Final
BC 79
NCSU 63
Final
LAS 56
RIU 59
Final
UNH 65
MAINE 56
 
Final
IUPUI 80
NEOM 87
 
Final
WINT 80
PBY 53
 
Final
VMI 69
SAMF 80
 
Final
CITA 54
WCU 67
 
Final
DEP 53
BUT 67
Final
LONG 70
CAMP 65
 
Final
TULA 47
CIN 63
Final
VCU 55
DAY 59
Final
TOWS 60
DEL 65
 
Final
WMARY 66
DREX 80
 
Final
JVU 75
FLGC 67
 
Final
EVAN 67
ILLST 69
 
Final
BRAD 52
INDST 60
 
Final
MIAMI 64
UNC 73
Final
WICHS 74
NIOWA 60
Final
UWGB 83
OU 63
 
Final
LSU 73
MISS 63
Final
OKLA 67
TCU 60
Final
BING 76
UMBC 69
 
Final
AFA 60
UTST 74
 
Final
GTDNS 79
VERM 73
 
Final
XAV 66
VILL 78
Final
MNTER 74
WAGN 64
 
Final
ILLCH 61
WRST 46
 
Final
YALE 90
SARAHLAW 55
 
Final
UAB 100
MTST 95
 
Final
NDAK 65
SUTAH 71
 
Final
LIB 77
UNCA 95
 
Final
CHIST 65
WLVRN 44
 
Final
UMO 57
BGU 62
 
Final
SHU 84
LIU 73
 
Final
APP 66
LAMON 43
 
Final
VANDY 73
ALA 66
 
2nd
KENT 78
ARK 51
 
2nd
NCCU 62
COOK 44
 
Half
MRGST 43
COPST 51
 
Final
SHU 67
CREI 66
 
2nd
BONA 80
DUQ 68
 
2nd
MERC 59
ETST 61
 
Final
UMASS 82
FORD 74
 
Final
RAD 72
GWEBB 62
 
2nd
JMU 75
HOF 63
 
Final
BU 70
HC 77
 
2nd
KYST 70
ISU 69
 
2nd
DELST 56
MDES 58
 
Final
LOYC 65
MIZST 51
 
2nd
IDAHO 73
MNTST 65
 
3rd
MCNST 70
NICST 70
 
2nd
TTU 55
OKST 55
 
2nd
PORT 61
SDU 72
 
2nd
BRY 58
Terriers 46
 
3rd
RMU 57
RFLSH 57
 
2nd
UVA 69
VT 54
 
2nd
BAY 76
WVU 58
 
2nd
FUR 51
WOFF 56
 
Final
SILL 63
DRAK 56
 
2nd
FD 57
CCST 42
 
2nd
WMICH 51
EMICH 54
 
2nd
CSOU 49
HIGH 50
 
Half
UNCG 27
CHAT 25
 
Half
SD 44
SDKST 34
 
1st
CARK 18
SELA 18
 
Half
KU 31
TEX 34
 
Half
EWASH 39
MONT 42
 
1st
TROY 18
UGST 26
 
1st
TXST 17
ARKST 7
 
1st
UNT 17
ODU 10
 
6:00pm Tonight
CORN
DART
 
6:00pm Tonight
NCAT
FAM
 
6:00pm Tonight
PSU
IOWA
6:00pm Tonight
MORE
JVST
 
6:00pm Tonight
PEPP
LMU
 
6:00pm Tonight
SCAR
MSST
6:00pm Tonight
BRO
PRIN
 
6:00pm Tonight
NEV
SJST
6:00pm Tonight
SCST
SAV
 
6:00pm Tonight
BEL
TENST
 
6:00pm Tonight
UF
TENN
6:00pm Tonight
ALAST
TXSOU
 
6:30pm Tonight
SOUTH
ALCOR
 
6:30pm Tonight
JST
MVSU
 
7:00pm Tonight
SEMIZ
PEAY
 
7:00pm Tonight
TOL
BST
 
7:00pm Tonight
KSU
BUF
 
7:00pm Tonight
LBSU
CSFU
 
7:00pm Tonight
MARS
FATL
7:00pm Tonight
STLU
GMAS
7:00pm Tonight
DAVID
GWU
7:00pm Tonight
HOW
HAMP
 
7:00pm Tonight
CLMB
HARV
 
7:00pm Tonight
LAM
INCWORD
 
7:00pm Tonight
YOUNG
UWMIL
 
7:00pm Tonight
TENNM
MURST
 
7:00pm Tonight
ELON
UNCW
 
7:00pm Tonight
ILL
NW
7:00pm Tonight
YALE
PENN
 
7:00pm Tonight
ALAAM
PVU
 
7:00pm Tonight
STJOE
RICH
7:00pm Tonight
UNF
STET
 
7:00pm Tonight
HART
USB
 
7:00pm Tonight
DUKE
SYR
7:00pm Tonight
EKENT
TENT
 
7:00pm Tonight
LATU
TXSA
7:00pm Tonight
NKENTUCKY
USCU
 
7:00pm Tonight
MAST
WILL
 
7:05pm Tonight
UMKC
GRCN
 
7:15pm Tonight
NO
ABCHRIST
 
8:00pm Tonight
SDST
BSU
8:00pm Tonight
NILL
CMICH
 
8:00pm Tonight
RICE
CHAR
8:00pm Tonight
ORU
DEN
 
8:00pm Tonight
WKENT
FIU
8:00pm Tonight
TXPA
NMST
 
8:00pm Tonight
COC
NE
 
8:00pm Tonight
TAMCC
SHSU
 
8:00pm Tonight
SCU
GAELS
 
8:00pm Tonight
HOUB
STEPH
 
8:00pm Tonight
SMISS
UTEP
8:00pm Tonight
MEM
TULSA
8:00pm Tonight
UNLV
WYO
8:15pm Tonight
TXARL
ARKLR
 
8:15pm Tonight
LALAF
GSOUT
 
8:30pm Tonight
TEXAM
AUB
8:30pm Tonight
ARKPB
GRAM
 
9:00pm Tonight
UTAH
ARZ
9:00pm Tonight
NCOL
NARZ
 
10:00pm Tonight
GONZ
BYU
10:00pm Tonight
WEBER
IDST
 
10:00pm Tonight
FRES
NMU
10:00pm Tonight
USF
PAC
 
10:00pm Tonight
CPSL 0
UCD 0
 
10:05pm Tonight
PORST
SACST
 
10:30pm Tonight
SEAT
CALST
 
10:30pm Tonight
CSNO
UCR
 
10:30pm Tonight
USC
WASH
11:59pm Tonight
UCSB
UCI
 
Final
FLA 5
BUF 3
 
Final
NAS 3
DET 4
 
1st Intermission
NYI 1
CAR 1
 
2nd
CLB 0
NJD 1
 
1st
BOS 1
ARI 0
 
7:00pm Tonight
MON
TOR
8:00pm Tonight
PHI
NYR
10:00pm Tonight
COL
MIN
10:00pm Tonight
SJS
OTT
10:00pm Tonight
EDM
STL