banner
Duke

Duke AD White cautions against power conference split

Posted June 4

— As the university athletic system continues change based on student economic needs, the top conferences are worried about student-athlete financial assistance.

Duke University athletic director Kevin White, the 2013 Athletic Director of the Year, has ideas that are different from many of the other athletic directors in the Power 5 conferences -- the ACC, SEC, BIG 10, BIG 12, and the PAC 12.

One of the newest ideas would be for the Power 5 to break away from Division I and form their own division, known as Division IV. This would enable the commissioners to decide on economic opportunities for athletes. 

However, there are many different ideas for what Division IV could be and none of them are fully formed as of now.

“There are so many concepts and ideas being shopped that aren’t fully vetted,” White said Wednesday while joining Adan and Joe on 99.9 The Fan ESPN Radio. “People have so many different ideas for what could be Division IV. I believe maintaining the association which we call the NCAA is an important element as it relates to moving forward with college athletics. I think it’s a really important enterprise moving forward.”

Many people argue there are such big differences between the Power 5 and the lower levels of the NCAA that they no longer offer the same things to each other.

White believes this couldn’t be further from the truth.

“I think it’s really important for lower levels, like Division III to hang around with the Power 5 and I think there’s really good residual impact for the Power 5 to hang around with Division III schools and everyone in between,” White said. “I think for a cluster of schools to break rank and forge their own path is not in the best interest of the aggregate enterprise of the NCAA.”

White acknowledged things change over time and need to adapt in order to prosper. Instead of breaking into a separate division all together, White would like to see the NCAA stay with the same format.

“We’re in a bit of a market correction. We will figure this out,” he said. “Things change and they do morph over time. I think there is some value for keeping the big tent together.”

With ‘haves and have-nots’ in the NCAA, White worries about a point being reached where all schools can no longer coexist in the same association.

“We’re at a point now where we don’t want to blow up the whole enterprise for the needs of a select few,” said White.

White is fearful one day universities will want to turn their athletic departments into sole entertainment industries, rather than intermingling the necessary academic requirements.

“The day we move away from that, we have a developmental league, and there isn’t a developmental league in the country that can stand on its own,” White said. “We cannot be entirely an entertainment property, but we have to be integral and take advantage of the academic advantages that do exist.”

A big reason Division IV is even being discussed is a student-based need for athletes. While scholarships pay for tuition, it leaves no other money for other things. That is, unless they come from families that could afford to send their children to college in the first place.

White feels giving all student-athletes full cost of attendance is not financially viable, but realizes there are students that need that option.

“I’m someone who believes in full cost attendance based on need,” said White. “I want all of our athletes to have a really good experience at Duke. I don’t know that I’m worried about driving resources to the ones that don’t need the financial assistance, but the ones that do not have the financial wherewithal to do that. To me, full cost of attendance for everyone seems like overkill.”

As the NCAA attempts to re-do the way things have been handled, White is confident something new will be worked out without drastic changes occurring.

“It’s worked for 100 years and I’m pretty confident we’ll find a way to make it work for another 100 years or so.”

8 Comments

This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • caniac87 Jun 5, 2:46 p.m.

    It they (NCAA) don't want this (power conference split off) to happen they had better get on... View More

    — Posted by jmcdow2792

    1. The BCS system has made more money for the NCAA than they've ever made, so why would they... View More

    — Posted by caniac87

    Well it is odd that the BCS has been done away with. The NCAA could bring back the freshman... View More

    — Posted by jmcdow2792

    So they added 2 games, gained millions by letting cities bid for 2 semifinal sites, and renamed it. That's nice. It essentially is the same cash cow that was the BCS.

    The freshman ineligibility rule would only work for football, and there is no "one and done" problem there anyway. There is absolutely no way they will ever make freshmen ineligible in basketball, the sport wouldn't survive. The only hope is for the NBA to change its rules. To be honest, one year of guys like Jabari Parker, Andrew Wiggins, Carmelo Anthony, etc. is better than no years with those guys.

  • jmcdow2792 Jun 5, 11:45 a.m.

    It they (NCAA) don't want this (power conference split off) to happen they had better get on... View More

    — Posted by jmcdow2792

    1. The BCS system has made more money for the NCAA than they've ever made, so why would they... View More

    — Posted by caniac87

    Well it is odd that the BCS has been done away with. The NCAA could bring back the freshman ineligible rule. That would eliminate the one and done.

  • justabumer Jun 5, 10:45 a.m.

    Perhaps this could develop and the new group could do what should have been done long ago - require every student, including athletes, to meet the same entrance requirements.

  • caniac87 Jun 5, 6:51 a.m.

    It they (NCAA) don't want this (power conference split off) to happen they had better get on... View More

    — Posted by jmcdow2792

    1. The BCS system has made more money for the NCAA than they've ever made, so why would they change it?

    2. I don't understand why people can't understand that the "one and done" rule is the NBA's rule. There is absolutely nothing the NCAA can do about it. The NBA isn't going to make rule changes that are in the best interest of anyone other than the NBA. I'm sure the NCAA would love to get rid of the "one and done" rule if they were able to. I'm amazed that people continue to blame this on the NCAA.

  • caniac87 Jun 5, 6:46 a.m.

    Too bad his name isn't Bubba Cunningham, or John Swofford....

    Someone might actually pay some... View More

    — Posted by TarheelDynasty

    Of course, they would have a different opinion than White because their precious UNC is incapable of following the rules. Now that the UNC has finally caught up with decades of the "Carolina Way", UNC wants to change the rules instead of following the same rules that everyone has to.

  • jmcdow2792 Jun 5, 5:41 a.m.

    It they (NCAA) don't want this (power conference split off) to happen they had better get on with resolving a bunch of issues rather than dragging thier feet as they have been. The most important one is the development of some sort of meaningful football championship system followed closely by issues like one and done. I don't know the answers but they need to find them.

  • TarheelDynasty Jun 4, 11:48 p.m.

    Too bad his name isn't Bubba Cunningham, or John Swofford....

    Someone might actually pay some attention to him....

  • Ken D. Jun 4, 7:16 p.m.

    "that aren’t fully feted"

    Has the proofreader gone the way of the dodo? White is an educated man. I'm sure what he said was "vetted".

  • NFL: Chicago at Detroit

    Thursday at 12:30 pm on WRAL-TV

  • NFL: Philadelphia at Dallas

    Thursday at 4:00 pm on FOX50

  • SEC: Arkansas at Missouri

    Friday at 2:30 pm on WRAL-TV

  • HSFB: Football Friday with Tom Suiter

    Friday at 11:35 pm on WRAL-TV

  • CBB: Duke vs. Furman

    Tomorrow at 5:00 pm on 620am

  • CBB: NC State vs. Richmond

    Tomorrow at 7:00 pm on WRAL-FM

  • NHL: Hurricanes at Florida

    Tomorrow at 7:30 pm on 99.9 The Fan

  • NFL: Chicago Bears at Detroit Lions

    Thursday at 12:30 pm on 99.9 The Fan

Scoreboard
Local
Final
ECU 58
FRES 52
Final
CIN 59
NCCU 50
 
Final
WAS 102
ATL 106
Final
MIA 97
GSW 114
Final
MIL 98
DET 86
 
Final
NOP 89
SAC 99
 
Final
DEN 114
CHI 109
 
Final
UMO 21
OHIO 24
 
Final
ECU 58
FRES 52
Final
ELON 74
MRGST 73
 
Final
MIZZ 61
PURD 82
Final
MAR 55
HAW 62
Final
UNF 77
LIB 57
 
Final
CHAM 85
BYU 121
Final
BUCK 58
MDES 55
Final
UGST 85
WCU 70
Final
UWGB 64
EVAN 62
Final
ARST 71
ALA 76
 
Final
OHIO 69
ARKPB 60
 
Final
UNH 75
BU 68
 
Final
OU 70
CHIST 57
Final
TOL 79
DET 82
 
Final
CLMB 57
FD 47
 
Final
QUIN 50
HART 54
 
Final
SFLA 71
HOF 70
 
Final
HARV 84
HOU 63
Final
BONA 79
JST 71
 
Final
STJOE 74
LIU 70
 
Final
SYR 70
GHND 37
 
Final
MLOWELL 102
MTIDA 57
 
Final
CIN 59
NCCU 50
 
Final
VT 54
NIOWA 73
Final
WOFF 82
OHVALLEY 54
 
Final
TEMPL 76
PENN 67
Final
RUTG 50
PETE 68
Final
BGU 62
SEMIZ 54
Final
LAS 73
Terriers 60
 
Final
UVA 79
TENST 36
Final
KENT 92
TXARL 44
Final
FSU 66
CITA 55
Final
PBY 63
TOCC 40
 
Final
COOK 56
TENNM 74
 
Final
WMARY 83
WILL 49
Final
USB 71
WKENT 61
 
Final
HIGH 88
WMPEACE 71
 
Final
SMU 72
ARK 78
Final
ARMY 80
BING 54
 
Final
CSOU 80
CARK 67
 
Final
UMBC 54
HOW 68
 
Final
ARZ 72
KYST 68
Final
OREG 63
VCU 77
Final
PSU 78
AKR 72
 
Final
SCST 92
CIU 55
 
Final
CREI 75
EILL 53
 
Final
ALAAM 61
JVST 67
 
Final
ABCHRIST 91
JCHR 65
 
Final
TXSA 57
LOYC 71
 
Final
NDST 64
MNCROOK 63
 
Final
NEB 80
NEOM 67
 
Final
VANDY 63
NORST 53
 
Final
STLU 57
NCAT 54
 
Final
MTST 65
NARZ 53
 
Final
TTU 75
NWST 64
 
Final
TULA 74
SOUTH 59
 
Final
ILLCH 87
STXAVIER 76
 
Final
TEX 78
RFLSH 46
 
Final
BRAD 52
TAMCC 38
 
Final
SMISS 72
TROY 70
 
Final
DRAK 73
IUPUI 60
 
Final
ARKST 58
LAM 63
 
Final
FLGC 62
USF 47
 
Final
COL 68
AFA 53
 
Final
IDAHO 75
BSU 86
 
Final
GRCN 64
BUF 80
 
Final
ORU 52
LALAF 76
 
Final
CHAR 74
MIAMI 77
 
Final
ISU 63
MD 72
 
2nd
UMO 43
NW 52
 
2nd
SACST 88
BRISTOL 49
 
2nd
MICH 36
VILL 38
 
2nd
SDST 52
PITT 35
 
1st
USC 18
CSFU 17
 
1st
STAN 31
DEL 10
 
Final
CLB 2
WIN 4
Final
NAS 4
LOS 3
 
Final
STL 2
OTT 3
 
Final
DAL 3
EDM 2
 
1st OT
ARI 3
COL 3
 
2nd
ANA 2
CAL 0
 
2nd
VAN 1
NJD 0