Duke beating FSU could be better for ACC long-term

Posted December 6, 2013

It’s hard to blame casual football fans and national pundits for having a bit of fun with Duke’s football season. There are plenty of jokes to go around, and the snarky tweets have no doubt flowed on Twitter timelines from coast to coast. Historically, this makes sense. After all, 10 wins or not, it is Duke — or as it’s often pronounced with a smirk, it is just Duke.

Of course, those well-versed in college football understand the enormity of what David Cutcliffe has accomplished in just a few short seasons in Durham, taking a perennial laughingstock of a program and winning more games in 2013 than nine other Blue Devil coaches ever won at Duke in their entire careers.

Sportswriters (good ones, anyway) know that no major conference team walks into double-digit wins, no matter how easy a schedule might seem, and that no program just falls into a conference championship game, no matter how weak a conference might be perceived.

But perceptions matter. And this presents quite the problem for the ACC and its fans as the league’s Saturday championship game (8 p.m., ABC, 620 AM The Buzz) between the Blue Devils and Seminoles approaches.

On the surface, it seems like Duke is nothing more than the sacrificial lamb to be feasted on at the table of Jimbo Fisher and top-ranked Florida State. Just look that the Las Vegas odds, where most casinos have the ‘Noles favored by — what seems like a typo — around 29 points. Or just look at the ESPN promos running for the game, where Duke essentially gets the treatment of the nameless opposing team in a sports movie.

The storyline is clear: Florida State is back.

There isn’t necessarily anything wrong with this. Sports feed off narratives. It’s great for fans. It creates excitement. It sells tickets. The conventional wisdom is that it’s good for football for traditional powerhouses like FSU to be “back.” It makes us feel that everything is right in the world of sports; that things make sense again.

For FSU to win the ACC Championship Game and head to the BCS National Championship Game seems good for college football in general. And to raise the stakes, Jameis Winston and Jimbo Fisher aren’t just seen as saviors of this particular blue-blood program, but of the entire Atlantic Coast Conference — whose existence seemed in doubt just a couple years ago.

In that regard it doesn’t just feel like the ACC wants this, but needs this. And the end-game for Duke is quite obvious: don’t blow it.

Translation: don’t win. Sure, don’t forfeit or roll over. But certainly don’t ruin this for your conference.

What complicates things is that Florida State’s opponent isn’t a traditionally decent team. For fans and pundits, it isn’t just that an FSU loss would crush the ACC’s title hopes, but that a loss to Duke (or remember, Duke) would be an outright embarrassment for the league — proving that if the league's most dominant team in 15 years could lose to Duke, then the ACC really is just a laughingstock after all.

Yes, in the sensible world of sports, an FSU loss to an 8-4 Virginia Tech or 9-3 Miami team would make more sense and cause less ridicule than losing to a 10-2 Duke team who beat both of those aforementioned squads. Reminder: Duke hasn’t lost since it was summertime on the calendar, a time when the starting QB was injured, no less (Cue the Ryan Kelly-like “Duke hasn’t loss with Anthony Boone in the lineup” info graphics).

If it sounds a bit ridiculous that a 10-2 BCS school winning a conference title game could cause these PR problems, it’s because it is. No other conference would operate this way. It’s simply hard to wipe away decades of Duke history and “basketball school” jokes.

But it’s time for David Cutcliffe and the Blue Devils to do away with this. If national pundits and fans don’t want to believe: too bad, force them. Odds are they’ll get crushed on Saturday. But if they don’t, it will be great for the league. It will prove that any coach can come to this conference and win and beat one of the more dominant college football teams in a decade. It will show that any ACC school can make a few smart coaching decisions, win a few recruiting victories and be in contention.

This would represent a total paradigm shift in college football — a sport controlled by old school traditions, where 6-6 teams from the SEC are regarded as top 25-esque simple because of the name on their jerseys, and where sportswriters with poll votes stick to their guns no matter how bad their early seasons predictions are by year’s end.

This is a sport where a winless team beating the best team in the conference is seen as a good thing — only if it’s from the right conference. In the traditionally dominant conferences, this shows depth, it shows strength. But for the little ACC, it has always shown weakness.

Duke can change all of that on Saturday, and then change it all again in the BCS. Sure, the Blue Devils probably don’t have a chance, but then again no one thought they had a chance to make it this far either.

The times, they are a changin’.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Newest First
View all
  • pdolan6 Dec 6, 2013

    I'm proud of duke either way. The will have the best record in the history of Duke football win or lose. This success wasn't built in a day with Coach Cut and the monumental task of beating teams like Felony State will take some time too.

  • hi_i_am_wade Dec 6, 2013

    So ... Duke ruining the ACC's best chance to win a national championship is a good thing? If it is, then I am the king of Siam.

  • jamestownbball Dec 6, 2013

    View quoted thread

    NO I AM.

  • wbturnage Dec 6, 2013

    Duke is a team that is in the ACC. So is Florida State. A Florida State win puts them in the National Championship game. A loss takes them out of it, thus taking revenue away from the conference. With that logic in place how in the world can Duke winning be good for the conference? a good thing for Duke definitely. But it would actually cost the conference money since a Duke win would put Florida State in a bowl game that pays out less than the national title game.

  • wbturnage Dec 6, 2013

    Think before you write, people!!!!!!!!! lolololol

  • DML Dec 6, 2013

    This might, quite possibly, be the dumbest article ever written.

    Duke winning this game would be good for them, and their program, but terrible for the ACC. The Conference hasn't had a National Championship in football in nearly 14 years now. Do you not understand why the SEC gets talked about as the premiere conference in football? It's because they win Championships.

    Was this article titled and written exclusively to troll for clicks?

  • jamestownbball Dec 6, 2013

    View quoted thread

    If the SEC doesn't win it this year, and get that $$, will their conference crumble??

    Point is it would be great to show that any team in the ACC can become a contender. Great for recruiting, bringing in great coaches, everything.

    If FSU beats Duke by 100, just shows the rest of the ACC is TERRIBLE.

    How does that help the conference? How do dollars actually help the conference long term?

  • Riddickfield Dec 6, 2013

    I'll have what he's drinking!

  • jamestownbball Dec 6, 2013

    View quoted thread

    So in 2001, right after FSU won a title, you think the ACC was considered a top conference?

    Are you insane?

  • ABCers burning jerseys Dec 6, 2013

    A win won't help Duke's recruiting because they only recruit student athletes.




  • ACTION: Dew Tour

    Saturday at 5:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • GOLF: Women's British Open

    Saturday at 11:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • Breeders’ Cup Challenge Series: Haskell

    Sunday at 5:00 am on WRAL-TV

  • ACTION: Dew Tour

    Sunday at 2:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • OLYMPICS: Kerri Walsh Special

    Sunday at 4:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • GOLF: Women's British Open

    Sunday at 11:00 pm on WRAL-TV

MLB Scoreboard
Chi White Sox 5:05 PT6:05 MT7:05 CT8:05 ET20:05 ET0:05 GMT8:05 5:05 MST7:05 EST7:35 VEN4:05 UAE (+1)7:05 CT
Chi Cubs 
American League
Baltimore 4:10 PT5:10 MT6:10 CT7:10 ET19:10 ET23:10 GMT7:10 4:10 MST6:10 EST6:40 VEN3:10 UAE (+1)6:10 CT
Kansas City 5:05 PT6:05 MT7:05 CT8:05 ET20:05 ET0:05 GMT8:05 5:05 MST7:05 EST7:35 VEN4:05 UAE (+1)7:05 CT
Boston 7:05 PT8:05 MT9:05 CT10:05 ET22:05 ET2:05 GMT10:05 7:05 MST9:05 EST9:35 VEN6:05 UAE (+1)9:05 CT
LA Angels 
National League
Colorado 10:10 PT11:10 MT12:10 CT1:10 ET13:10 ET17:10 GMT1:10 10:10 MST12:10 EST12:40 VEN21:10 UAE12:10 CT
NY Mets 
Arizona 11:10 PT12:10 MT1:10 CT2:10 ET14:10 ET18:10 GMT2:10 11:10 MST1:10 EST1:40 VEN22:10 UAE1:10 CT
Philadelphia 4:10 PT5:10 MT6:10 CT7:10 ET19:10 ET23:10 GMT7:10 4:10 MST6:10 EST6:40 VEN3:10 UAE (+1)6:10 CT
St. Louis 4:10 PT5:10 MT6:10 CT7:10 ET19:10 ET23:10 GMT7:10 4:10 MST6:10 EST6:40 VEN3:10 UAE (+1)6:10 CT
Washington 7:15 PT8:15 MT9:15 CT10:15 ET22:15 ET2:15 GMT10:15 7:15 MST9:15 EST9:45 VEN6:15 UAE (+1)9:15 CT
San Francisco 
ATP Scoreboard
Thursday, Jul. 28
Rogers Cup (ATP)
Third Round
(12) B. Tomic 
K. Anderson 
(3) K. Nishikori 
R. Ram 
(7) D. Goffin 
(10) G. Monfils 
(2) S. Wawrinka 
(16) J. Sock 
I. Karlovic 
G. Dimitrov 
(5) T. Berdych 
R. Harrison 
(4) M. Raonic 
J. Donaldson 
(1) N. Djokovic 
R. Stepanek 
WTA Scoreboard
Thursday, Jul. 28
Rogers Cup (WTA)
Third Round
(7) R. Vinci 
D. Kasatkina 
(5) S. Halep 
(14) K. Pliskova 
(9) S. Kuznetsova 
(12) P. Kvitova 
(4) A. Radwanska 
(16) A. Pavlyuchen 
(2) A. Kerber 
E. Svitolina 
(6) V. Williams 
(10) M. Keys 
(15) J. Konta 
V. Lepchenko 
E. Bouchard 
K. Kucova