RE: A good (old) article about the cheating ways of K and Dook
- Posted by jrj6950- Posted by nucdnsuct- Posted by jrj6950- Posted by nucdnsuct
Yeah... I can see how a dukie would view sworn, under oath testimony as not having any proof. Thanks for playing, and your parting gifts are at the door.
Still waiting on a link of that proof from the NCAA.
Here is your link to the bylaw. go to page 2, section 2.A (1)....
Just so you are aware, you don't need the NCAA to put you in the penalty box for you to be guilty. Just like when you broke the speed limit, and didn't get the ticket. So now know you can do with that (feeble) arguement you want to make next
PS this will end badly for you.
So just to clarify. You accused Duke of cheating, then provided a link to the bylaws, but provided no evidence of the NCAA (the governing body of college basketball) finding any wrongdoing.
Thanks for playing and proving my point.
Yeah, I completely understand how you view Maggette providing sworn testimony being a totally fictional event. Dukies are all above the laws and judicial systems in the US, and first person statements from these entities could never be used as proof.
So, not only did I provide proof, you also managed to make a baboon of yourself in the process. Knew it would end badly for you.....