PUKE
Heat 103, Thunder 97.
Shaney-Poo Battier, Heat:
24 minutes ,0-5 FG, 0 points, 0 rebounds, 0 assists, 0 steals, 1 block, 2 turnovers, 4 personal fouls.
- Posted by Lux Libertas
Well, ya boy started this stupid thread, what did you expect? Danny Fairy? LOL
RE: Shane Battier Update
Heat 103, Thunder 97.
Shaney-Poo Battier, Heat:
24 minutes ,0-5 FG, 0 points, 0 rebounds, 0 assists, 0 steals, 1 block, 2 turnovers, 4 personal fouls.
- Posted by Lux Libertas
Bad night with great results
RE: Shane Battier Update
If Shane is so bad, why would the coach play him 24 minutes? Sounds to me like UNC fans are like Roy....they only consider the offensive end of the court and ignore defense. Obviously, Shane must be doing something well if the coach is playing him 24 minutes in the biggest game (up to this point) in the season.
RE: Shane Battier Update
Comment deleted.
kato mistakenly responded to a post by 903 dookie homer (something that ceased after said homer posted disparaging and uncalled for remarks about the US military).
- Posted by kato_karma.v3
Battier played more minutes than the following. The ones in bold are paid more than Battier.
J. Anthony
R. Allen
N. Cole
M. Miller
J. Jones
R. Lewis
D. Pittman
U. Haslem
RE: Shane Battier Update
Comment deleted.
kato mistakenly responded to a post by 903 dookie homer (something that ceased after said homer posted disparaging and uncalled for remarks about the US military).
- Posted by kato_karma.v3
OWNED and in predictably cowardly fashion, he deleted his post. Typical for the loser.
The original reply was that the coach was forced to play Battier because the rest of the team's salary cap space was used on the big three. My reply to his fallacy demonstrates that the coach has other options that are paid more than Battier yet played fewer than Battier's 24 minutes.