My Teams
Log in to WRALSportsfan with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRALSportsfan account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRALSportsfan using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRALSportsfan account using our web form.

Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook


Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

The NCAA sent letters to former Miami players who have been ignoring their requests for interviews.

In those letters the athletes were told that if they refused to cooperate, the NCAA would take the allegatons of wrongdoing as fact and act appropriately.

What does this mean?

That the NCAA will act against Dook if Lance Thomas does not cooperate with them.

That 2010 banner is inching lower and lower.

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

The NCAA sent letters to former Miami players who have been ignoring their requests for interviews.

In those letters the athletes were told that if they refused to cooperate, the NCAA would take the allegatons of wrongdoing as fact and act appropriately.

What does this mean?

That the NCAA will act against Dook if Lance Thomas does not cooperate with them.

That 2010 banner is inching lower and lower. 
- Posted by DooksucksV3


Hmmmm so what does this mean about your former tutor? Or Julius Peppers? ROFL!!!

#byebye2005&2009

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

The NCAA sent letters to former Miami players who have been ignoring their requests for interviews.

In those letters the athletes were told that if they refused to cooperate, the NCAA would take the allegatons of wrongdoing as fact and act appropriately.

What does this mean?

That the NCAA will act against Dook if Lance Thomas does not cooperate with them.

That 2010 banner is inching lower and lower. 
- Posted by DooksucksV3


Butler

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

Ohes Noes!

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

Call the nurse in the change your diaper Thomas.

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

The NCAA sent letters to former Miami players who have been ignoring their requests for interviews.

In those letters the athletes were told that if they refused to cooperate, the NCAA would take the allegatons of wrongdoing as fact and act appropriately.

What does this mean?

That the NCAA will act against Dook if Lance Thomas does not cooperate with them.

That 2010 banner is inching lower and lower. 
- Posted by DooksucksV3


Butler 
- Posted by randythorntonv3


Jewelry!

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

Holden Thorpe and Matt kupec taking trips on private jets. HEHEHEHEHEHEHE Oh butler says Hi

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

The NCAA sent letters to former Miami players who have been ignoring their requests for interviews.

In those letters the athletes were told that if they refused to cooperate, the NCAA would take the allegatons of wrongdoing as fact and act appropriately.

What does this mean?

That the NCAA will act against Dook if Lance Thomas does not cooperate with them.

That 2010 banner is inching lower and lower. 
- Posted by DooksucksV3


The Miami case features a subject (Shapiro) who went on record and made detailed allegations against former players.These allegations presented by Mr. Shapiro in combination with the former players unwillingness to cooperate are what have led the NCAA to lay out an ultimatum. Who, in the Duke case, came forth to the NCAA with such detailed allegations? According to this article, the jeweler hasn't spoken with the NCAA.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/63796/lance-thomas-case-a-challenge-for-ncaa

So in theory, even if Lance Thomas doesn't talk to the NCAA, they have no direct account that Thomas did wrong otherwise. Oh, and for it's worth, Lance Thomas "has indicated a willingness to speak with the NCAA about the purchase."

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ex-duke-player-thomas-says-hell-talk-ncaa

I guess what I am saying is that I fail to see how these two incidents are identical and would thus warrant such an ultimatum.

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

The NCAA sent letters to former Miami players who have been ignoring their requests for interviews.

In those letters the athletes were told that if they refused to cooperate, the NCAA would take the allegatons of wrongdoing as fact and act appropriately.

What does this mean?

That the NCAA will act against Dook if Lance Thomas does not cooperate with them.

That 2010 banner is inching lower and lower. 
- Posted by DooksucksV3


The Miami case features a subject (Shapiro) who went on record and made detailed allegations against former players.These allegations presented by Mr. Shapiro in combination with the former players unwillingness to cooperate are what have led the NCAA to lay out an ultimatum. Who, in the Duke case, came forth to the NCAA with such detailed allegations? According to this article, the jeweler hasn't spoken with the NCAA.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/63796/lance-thomas-case-a-challenge-for-ncaa

So in theory, even if Lance Thomas doesn't talk to the NCAA, they have no direct account that Thomas did wrong otherwise. Oh, and for it's worth, Lance Thomas "has indicated a willingness to speak with the NCAA about the purchase."

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ex-duke-player-thomas-says-hell-talk-ncaa

I guess what I am saying is that I fail to see how these two incidents are identical and would thus warrant such an ultimatum.  
- Posted by Dr. Pwnt


Please do not bring reason, logic and facts into the discussion. It just upsets him.

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

The NCAA sent letters to former Miami players who have been ignoring their requests for interviews.

In those letters the athletes were told that if they refused to cooperate, the NCAA would take the allegatons of wrongdoing as fact and act appropriately.

What does this mean?

That the NCAA will act against Dook if Lance Thomas does not cooperate with them.

That 2010 banner is inching lower and lower. 
- Posted by DooksucksV3


The Miami case features a subject (Shapiro) who went on record and made detailed allegations against former players.These allegations presented by Mr. Shapiro in combination with the former players unwillingness to cooperate are what have led the NCAA to lay out an ultimatum. Who, in the Duke case, came forth to the NCAA with such detailed allegations? According to this article, the jeweler hasn't spoken with the NCAA.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/63796/lance-thomas-case-a-challenge-for-ncaa

So in theory, even if Lance Thomas doesn't talk to the NCAA, they have no direct account that Thomas did wrong otherwise. Oh, and for it's worth, Lance Thomas "has indicated a willingness to speak with the NCAA about the purchase."

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ex-duke-player-thomas-says-hell-talk-ncaa

I guess what I am saying is that I fail to see how these two incidents are identical and would thus warrant such an ultimatum.  
- Posted by Dr. Pwnt


Actually the court documents provide allegation that a violation has occurred.
Had Lance paid the jeweler on time, there would be no evidence of wrongdoing.

The NCAA is serving notice that it will no longer tolerate the "We don't have to talk" mantra of former players caught after the left school.

This is the only reason Thomas said he would eventually talk to the NCAA. The best bet is that he is forging some sort of documentation to try and get around the rules.

RE: Uh oh, possible bad news for Dook

The NCAA sent letters to former Miami players who have been ignoring their requests for interviews.

In those letters the athletes were told that if they refused to cooperate, the NCAA would take the allegatons of wrongdoing as fact and act appropriately.

What does this mean?

That the NCAA will act against Dook if Lance Thomas does not cooperate with them.

That 2010 banner is inching lower and lower. 
- Posted by DooksucksV3


The Miami case features a subject (Shapiro) who went on record and made detailed allegations against former players.These allegations presented by Mr. Shapiro in combination with the former players unwillingness to cooperate are what have led the NCAA to lay out an ultimatum. Who, in the Duke case, came forth to the NCAA with such detailed allegations? According to this article, the jeweler hasn't spoken with the NCAA.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/post/_/id/63796/lance-thomas-case-a-challenge-for-ncaa

So in theory, even if Lance Thomas doesn't talk to the NCAA, they have no direct account that Thomas did wrong otherwise. Oh, and for it's worth, Lance Thomas "has indicated a willingness to speak with the NCAA about the purchase."

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ex-duke-player-thomas-says-hell-talk-ncaa

I guess what I am saying is that I fail to see how these two incidents are identical and would thus warrant such an ultimatum.  
- Posted by Dr. Pwnt


Actually the court documents provide allegation that a violation has occurred.
Had Lance paid the jeweler on time, there would be no evidence of wrongdoing.

The NCAA is serving notice that it will no longer tolerate the "We don't have to talk" mantra of former players caught after the left school.

This is the only reason Thomas said he would eventually talk to the NCAA. The best bet is that he is forging some sort of documentation to try and get around the rules. 
- Posted by DooksucksV3


Move your head to the left a little bit. Your tinfoil hat is making my wifi go slower.

Please log in to add post.

Scoreboard
More Voices & Blogs

EMAIL CENTER

Click your team's logo to sign up

State unc Duke Hurricanes small logo 53x32 Bulls

 

Headlines Alerts