WRAL Sports Fan

Given the way this has played out, no one believes UNC was 100% forthcoming about all that happened over there. It's pretty clear that alot of stuff hasn't been and may never be revealed because UNC covered up stuff and we're only hearing some of but not nearly all of the story. 

- Posted by 903 Rock Chalk Wiggins Hawk

What specifically has been covered up? 

- Posted by zanerx

If I knew, then UNC wouldn't be the experts they are at covering up. Obviously, that's one thing they excel at, along with cheating. 

- Posted by 903 Rock Chalk Wiggins Hawk

I guess maybe I don't understand is how the NCAA can conduct an investigation and make a ruling on a non-justiciable issue. There has been a legal settlement between the adverse parties, so the case is closed. What happens if Lance Thomas, the jeweler, and Duke University refuse to comply with any of the NCAA's requests for explanations pertaining to this moot case or controversy? There is nothing a court of law can legally compel any of them to do at this point in relation to it, so what sort of recourse does the NCAA have?
' 

- Posted by Wolfpackalypse Now

I think you're missing the point. It's not the dispute between Lance and the jeweler that is the potential problem; it's the source of the $30,000 cash and the backing for the $70,000 financing. No matter how often paula says it, no one is going to float an unemployed college student $70k in financing without readily accessible collateral or a cosigner.

If none of the relevant parties talk - Lance, the jeweler, anyone else that knows anything, one of two things could happen: either the NCAA closes the investigation without further action, or they decide that "the thing speaks for itself," and sanction Duke with either probation or forfeit of victories after Lance made the purchase. I'm not sure the NCAA has to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt in order to impose sanctions.

If nothing else, K better wake up and get these guys under control, especially if they make another Final Four run this year. You certainly don't want Lance's "success" inspiring anyone else. 

- Posted by zanerx

They don't understand that the documents filed in the case are admissible as fact.

I think that K has informed them that he is retiring soon. The NCAA is going to wait until then to strip the banner and heavily sanction Dook into the stone age.

In 5 years they will look like the Wake team of the past few seasons.

Sad. 

- Posted by DooksucksV3

What specifically has been covered up? 

- Posted by zanerx

If I knew, then UNC wouldn't be the experts they are at covering up. Obviously, that's one thing they excel at, along with cheating. 

- Posted by 903 Rock Chalk Wiggins Hawk

A + B = I don't know, but there has to be something there, doesn't there? I mean, its UNC, and I hate them! Isn't that enough? 

- Posted by zanerx

I think you're missing the point. It's not the dispute between Lance and the jeweler that is the potential problem; it's the source of the $30,000 cash and the backing for the $70,000 financing. No matter how often paula says it, no one is going to float an unemployed college student $70k in financing without readily accessible collateral or a cosigner.

If none of the relevant parties talk - Lance, the jeweler, anyone else that knows anything, one of two things could happen: either the NCAA closes the investigation without further action, or they decide that "the thing speaks for itself," and sanction Duke with either probation or forfeit of victories after Lance made the purchase. I'm not sure the NCAA has to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt in order to impose sanctions.

If nothing else, K better wake up and get these guys under control, especially if they make another Final Four run this year. You certainly don't want Lance's "success" inspiring anyone else. 

- Posted by zanerx

They don't understand that the documents filed in the case are admissible as fact.

I think that K has informed them that he is retiring soon. The NCAA is going to wait until then to strip the banner and heavily sanction Dook into the stone age.

In 5 years they will look like the Wake team of the past few seasons.

Sad. 

- Posted by DooksucksV3

Another of your predictions based on nothing but your hate of Duke.

The obsession continues.  

- Posted by randythorntonv3

Recruiting just got a little tougher for UNCheat. No AFAM major, no no show classes and now their coach is interviewing for another job one year after coming to UNCheat. 

- Posted by randythorntonv3

They don't understand that the documents filed in the case are admissible as fact.

I think that K has informed them that he is retiring soon. The NCAA is going to wait until then to strip the banner and heavily sanction Dook into the stone age.

In 5 years they will look like the Wake team of the past few seasons.

Sad. 

- Posted by DooksucksV3

Another of your predictions based on nothing but your hate of Duke.

The obsession continues.  

- Posted by randythorntonv3

NCAA = Guilty until proven innocent.

There is no presumption of innocence.  

- Posted by DooksucksV3

Another of your predictions based on nothing but your hate of Duke.

The obsession continues.  

- Posted by randythorntonv3

NCAA = Guilty until proven innocent.

There is no presumption of innocence.  

- Posted by DooksucksV3

So when will the banner come down and the probation start?

You keep telling us things and they never come true.  

- Posted by randythorntonv3

NCAA = Guilty until proven innocent.

There is no presumption of innocence.  

- Posted by DooksucksV3

So when will the banner come down and the probation start?

You keep telling us things and they never come true.  

- Posted by randythorntonv3

The NCAA couldn't take the financial hit of putting Carolina on probation. The NCAA would crash! As far as the banners go........they will come down when Dukes and SCC's come down! Just let me know when that will be! 

- Posted by larrys080 .v1