RE: LMFAO!
I'm sure Duke's defense had nothing to do with them shooting 38%. If it wasn't their best, it was damn close to it.
The Free Throws, yes, they could have done better there, but those are "free". I personally think Duke fouled the right folks...they fouled their worst shooters mostly...was that part of their strategy? Unlikely, but those players probably didn't shoot any worse from the line than they have in any other game on average.
If it wasn't their best, they did a good job of faking it. They haven't played with that much intensity this year...and their defense was the best it's been all year.
- Posted by Tizu
Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=323262124Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=323240153Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=323250153Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=323640153Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=330360153
That is just a few. In fact, the offensive stats were comparable to the Indiana game.
Was that one of UNC's better performances?
Indiana game was comparable stats? The difference in that game was Indiana making 7 more 3 pointers than UNC, and outrebounding them 44-34.
It was comparable in offensive stats.
According to you guys Dook played badly, UNC's defense had nothing to do with it.
It can not be both ways.
RE: LMFAO!
According to you guys Dook played badly, UNC's defense had nothing to do with it.
No, no. I've been saying all day I give all the credit for Duke's play to the UNC defense. On numerous threads. Again, why I said they brought their best game.
RE: LMFAO!
Man he is really trying hard to pull a moral victory out of this. Per Roy Williams "We do not believe in moral victories".
RE: LMFAO!
Nah, he's defending his team...any good fan would.
RE: LMFAO!
I'm sure Duke's defense had nothing to do with them shooting 38%. If it wasn't their best, it was damn close to it.
The Free Throws, yes, they could have done better there, but those are "free". I personally think Duke fouled the right folks...they fouled their worst shooters mostly...was that part of their strategy? Unlikely, but those players probably didn't shoot any worse from the line than they have in any other game on average.
If it wasn't their best, they did a good job of faking it. They haven't played with that much intensity this year...and their defense was the best it's been all year.
- Posted by Tizu
Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=323262124Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=323240153Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=323250153Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=323640153Better:
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=330360153
That is just a few. In fact, the offensive stats were comparable to the Indiana game.
Was that one of UNC's better performances?
Indiana game was comparable stats? The difference in that game was Indiana making 7 more 3 pointers than UNC, and outrebounding them 44-34.
It was comparable in offensive stats.
According to you guys Dook played badly, UNC's defense had nothing to do with it.
It can not be both ways.
Unc played outstanding defense. I believe that was the most turnovers duke has had in one game. 11 in the first half alone.
RE: LMFAO!
Nah, he's defending his team...any good fan would.
- Posted by Tizu
Hey I agree with that sentiment... but you are wasting your time with Blueduke on that score. His idea of a "good" fan is one that trashes his own team, as per his numerous posts on the Wolves Den site in support of Hans, the wolfpack hating NCSU "fan".
Rank: Sports Legend 
Rank: 
