banner

Stats for discussion

Return to Forum

Please to add a comment.

Newest First
  • hovis Nov 23, 2012
    All Star

    Here is a summary of the preseason rankings compared to wins. Now it should be noted that part of the low ecu ranking came from doubts at running back and at the time these numbers were released v.cooper was not on the roster. This would likely have increased the ranking somewhat. These rankings are meant to reflect preseason talent and one teams likelyhood of beating another team more than schedule win ability or anything else.
    ECU-108 th

    Teams beaten:Tulane(107), UAB(114), Memphis(119), Utep(111), S.Miss(70), Houston(67).
    Cumulative wins score:211-125
    Teams lost to:UCF(38), unc(45), s.Car(11), navy(80).
    Cumulative score:64-171
    Marshall-64th
    Just for discussion, I think this reflects better on old Ruff than most would give him credit for.

  • cooperitis Nov 23, 2012
    Bench Warmer

    Maybe it's because I'm mostly stupid, but I don't quite get what you're trying to say here.

    Preseason stats (and polls for that matter)don't actually mean that much. They are based upon "expectations" going off of past experience and body of work with leftover talent. I would be more interested in the current Sagarin rankings.

    Those stats mainly tell me that ECU has beaten the expected sorry teams and have lost to the good expected teams. But who could have predicted that So Miss (70) would not have won a game. That's why I feel that current stats would show a more true refection of football program. The only good thing I see from those stats is that ECU has done much better than the preseason expectations. I will give it that.

  • hovis Nov 23, 2012
    All Star

    View quoted thread

    I am not trying to really encourage you to take away anything positive or negative from these stats. My comment concerning Ruffin was solely based on that these stats suggest that as you said he beat who he should have and list the others. The only reason that I would take a slightly positive view from this is that ecu would not logically be 108 now thus have improved, to what degree could be certainly argued.
    Just worked up the numbers and found them interesting for preseason stats. If you kind of count the s.miss thing as an anomaly they are fairly accurate with the only exception being the 108 by ECU.
    You are right about how these numbers work vs Sagarin. These are usually used as the likelyhood of one team versus another ignoring strength of schedule and w/l predictions. For that reason I find them a little more telling. Take Kentucky in basketball right now for example. The three ranking is an end of the season ranking. They expect them to be the third best team...in March. If you beat them in March you may beat the 3rd ranked team but right now in the type of above rankings they would be 30th or so.

Newest First
  • PGA Golf: The Greenbrier Classic

    Tomorrow at 3:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • MiLB: Bulls vs. Norfolk

    Tomorrow at 5:00 pm on METV 50.2

  • Women's World Cup Final USA vs. Japan

    Tomorrow at 7:00 pm on FOX50

  • MiLB: Bulls vs. Norfolk

    Monday at 7:00 pm on METV 50.2

  • MLB: NY Mets at LA Dodgers

    Tonight at 7:00 on 99.9 The Fan

  • MiLB: Bulls vs. Norfolk

    Tomorrow at 4:50 pm on Buzz Sports Radio

  • MLB: San Francisco at Washington

    Tomorrow at 8:00 pm on 99.9 The Fan

  • MiLB: Bulls vs. Norfolk

    Monday at 6:50 pm on Buzz Sports Radio

MLB Scoreboard
Interleague
Cleveland1:05 PT2:05 MT3:05 CT4:05 ET16:05 ET20:05 GMT4:05 1:05 MST3:05 EST3:35 VEN0:05 UAE (+1)3:05 CT
Preview
Pittsburgh
American League
Tampa Bay0Bot
8th
NY Yankees2
 
Toronto1Top
7th
Detroit5
 
Houston0Bot
6th
Boston4
 
Baltimore0Top
5th
Chi White Sox1
 
Seattle1:05 PT2:05 MT3:05 CT4:05 ET16:05 ET20:05 GMT4:05 1:05 MST3:05 EST3:35 VEN0:05 UAE (+1)3:05 CT
Preview
Oakland
 
Minnesota 4:15 PT5:15 MT6:15 CT7:15 ET19:15 ET23:15 GMT7:15 4:15 MST6:15 EST6:45 VEN3:15 UAE (+1)6:15 CT
Preview
Kansas City 
 
LA Angels 6:05 PT7:05 MT8:05 CT9:05 ET21:05 ET1:05 GMT9:05 6:05 MST8:05 EST8:35 VEN5:05 UAE (+1)8:05 CT
Preview
Texas 
National League
San Francisco3Final
Washington9
 
San Diego1Bot
5th
St. Louis0
 
Philadelphia 4:15 PT5:15 MT6:15 CT7:15 ET19:15 ET23:15 GMT7:15 4:15 MST6:15 EST6:45 VEN3:15 UAE (+1)6:15 CT
Preview
Atlanta 
 
Miami 4:15 PT5:15 MT6:15 CT7:15 ET19:15 ET23:15 GMT7:15 4:15 MST6:15 EST6:45 VEN3:15 UAE (+1)6:15 CT
Preview
Chi Cubs 
 
Milwaukee4:15 PT5:15 MT6:15 CT7:15 ET19:15 ET23:15 GMT7:15 4:15 MST6:15 EST6:45 VEN3:15 UAE (+1)6:15 CT
Preview
Cincinnati
 
NY Mets 4:15 PT5:15 MT6:15 CT7:15 ET19:15 ET23:15 GMT7:15 4:15 MST6:15 EST6:45 VEN3:15 UAE (+1)6:15 CT
Preview
LA Dodgers 
 
Colorado 7:10 PT8:10 MT9:10 CT10:10 ET22:10 ET2:10 GMT10:10 7:10 MST9:10 EST9:40 VEN6:10 UAE (+1)9:10 CT
Preview
Arizona 
 
ATP Scoreboard
Saturday, Jul. 4
Wimbledon (ATP/WTA)
Third Round
(20) R. Bautista A77 6 6   
N. Basilashvi64 0 1   
(22) V. Troicki6 77 4 6  
D. Brown4 63 6 3  
(2) R. Federer6 6 65 6  
S. Groth4 4 77 2  
(13) J. Tsonga63 6 62 69  
(23) I. Karlovic77 4 77 711  
(6) T. Berdych4 6 6 77  
P. Andujar6 0 3 63  
J. Ward4 6 6 3 6 
V. Pospisil6 3 2 6 8 
(3) A. Murray6 6 1 5  
(25) A. Seppi2 2 6 1  
(12) G. Simon3 6 3   
(18) G. Monfils6 3 3   
 
WTA Scoreboard
Saturday, Jul. 4
Wimbledon (ATP/WTA)
Third Round
(10) A. Kerber612 6 2   
(20) G. Muguruza714 1 6   
K. Pliskova3 5    
M. Niculescu6 7    
(5) C. Wozniacki6 6    
(31) C. Giorgi2 2    
(13) A. Radwanska6 6    
C. Dellacqua1 4    
(15) T. Bacsinszky6 6    
(18) S. Lisicki3 2    
(21) M. Keys6 6    
T. Maria4 4    
M. Rybarikova64 3    
O. Govortsova77 6    
(2) P. Kvitova6 5 4   
(28) J. Jankovic3 7 6