banner
Caulton Tudor

Maryland v. ACC could have far-reaching precedent

Posted January 15

The case may take months or years to be completely decided, but Maryland’s lawsuit against the ACC will be closely monitored by colleges and their lawyers throughout the nation. At stake, potentially, is the perceived stability conferences thought they had achieved through the relatively recent arrival of grants of television rights covenants.

The ACC formed such an union in April of 2013, roughly six months after Maryland announced it would leave the league after 2013-14 to join the Big Ten, which also has a grant of rights treaty among its members. So does the Big 12 Conference. The ACC pact runs through the length of its television contract with ESPN in 2027.

In theory, grant of rights agreements bind each conference member to its partners through what roughly works like a communal banking account.

The $156.8 million lawsuit filed Tuesday by the Maryland attorney general’s office is not related to any sort of grant of rights agreement. It originated with Maryland's resistance to a $52.2 million ACC exit penalty – an agreement Maryland ratified as an ACC member in September of 2012. 

The state and the school allege that the exit penalty should not apply as a result of procedural incidents and that the ACC has no right to withhold revenue shares from the school as the case plays out. But since the crux of the suit goes to the subject of conference/school agreements, it’s not out of the question that grant of rights pacts could be tangentially affected by the eventual court ruling or even an out-of-court settlement. 

Here’s why, through a completely hypothetical example:

Let’s say UNC, just to pick an ACC school, leaves the league and is accepted as a member of the Big Ten two or three years from now.

The ACC obviously would sue, claiming its authority via the grant of rights television covenant. But in joining the Big Ten, UNC would have entered a second grant of rights union and there are few, if any, legal precedents in such matters involving television networks, colleges, conferences and chain of command. At some point, given that scenario, the NCAA would be drawn into the fray since members of both the ACC and Big Ten are also bound to NCAA agreements regarding sports eligibility.

It’s entirely possible that after a long court fight, judges could rule any number of ways:

  • UNC’s media income could be ruled to be jointly owned by the ACC and Big Ten.
  • UNC could be ruled a sovereign sports entity and the sole owner of its product rights.
  • The entire matter could be shipped directly to arbitration, thereby assuring that both conferences would suffer some degree of disappointment.
  • Both conference covenants could be ruled illegally restrictive on free trade and completely voided.

There’s an old saying that no contract is ironclad. Whether that statement is accurate or not, it’s certain that there’s no way to stop any school or any conference from suing for its freedom (in the case of a school) or antimony (conference).

If recent history has taught us anything, it’s that there is no predicting where and when the conference realignment process will go, much less where and when it will end.

The outcome of Maryland’s suit over the exit-fee issue will serve as an important indicator of how the courts will view what has become a collegiate sports wild west show, complete with border raids, shot-gun weddings and financial range wars.

Collectively, college sports has become a billion-dollar-a-year industry that shows no sign of tapering. In fact, given the current growth rate of sports marketing and likelihood that more sports-oriented media outlets will emerge as technology advances, current TV contracts could be seen as pocket change in the future.

With so much money on the table, more lawsuits are likely to flare up. That much is inevitable, which is why Maryland v. the ACC will be must-see action in the boardrooms. And, of course, for law students from the Ivies to the Pac-12.

7 Comments

This blogpost is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Steven Jan 16, 9:55 a.m.

    Maryland was sold a bill of goods thinking they were going to make more money and save them in the Big Ten. All their old rivals are going to be gone and they are going to have less folks show up for their games. They are crazy if they think the Big Ten Network is going to make them as much money as they think it will. Hope they crash and burn for abandoning the ACC and have serious regrets about it down the road. Outside of forced matchups, their old ACC rivals will never play them.

  • GunnyGoesArrrgh Jan 15, 8:58 p.m.

    I think the ACC will do everything in its power to ensure Maryland does pay the $52 Mill, as the decision in this case will set a precedent. The penalty was set high deliberately, to discourage schools from bolting. I do remember Maryland (and I believe Florida State) voted against the exit fee, but the majority of schools voted in favor of it, so it was ratified.

    I have no bad feelings toward Maryland; they are in a terrible financial bind and leaving the ACC seemed like a viable solution to their financial woes.

    This situation has the potential to get quite ugly before it's over, and that's a shame, because there will be no winners, only bitter feelings and more financial issues.

  • 903 Hail Providence Jan 15, 6:42 p.m.

    The ACC was at the forefront of "conference raiding". Thanks to them, the Big East Conference... View More

    — Posted by cjw6105

    Would you rather have had the Big East raid the ACC and survive and then have the ACC deteriorate to the American conference or whatever it is? (Gtown, Butler, Nova and a bunch of other mid-majors)?

  • Ken D. Jan 15, 4:53 p.m.

    It originated with Maryland's resistance to a $52.2 million ACC exit penalty – an agreement Maryland ratified as an ACC member in September of 2012.

    Maryland did not "ratify" this provision. It opposed it, and did not vote for it. Maryland has claimed in its countersuit that league rules do not allow the conference to impose this penalty immediately upon achieving a favorable vote. I don't know if this claim is, in fact, true. Maryland gave official notice of its intent to leave the conference four days before the date the Terps claim the rule could first be effective.

    I expect the outcome of this case to be determined on such contractual issues, unless it is first settled out of court. Frankly, I think it's in everybody's interest (except maybe fans) that there be a negotiated settlement. Nobody should want any precedents established.

  • Ken D. Jan 15, 4:40 p.m.

    Antimony? Where did you get that word, Mr. Tudor? Are you sure you don't mean something like hegemony instead?

  • baldchip Jan 15, 4:10 p.m.

    University of Maryland-you signed the contract with the other Universities in the ACC !! I guess that does not matter any more. Humm-I wonder what folks at your Law School would say to that. Is the integrity of the University of Maryland that poor???

    That being said-I'm glad you're leaving. Aamen-Aamen!!! Just pay up before you leave-or all the ACC will haunt you forever!!

  • cjw6105 Jan 15, 2:28 p.m.

    The ACC was at the forefront of "conference raiding". Thanks to them, the Big East Conference exists primarily on the basketball court. And ACC football, never much to begin with, is now even weaker than before, with more rivalries being destroyed in order to make sure everybody gets "equal" treatment.

    I've never been much of a Maryland fan, but this is one time I'm pulling for the Terps. The ACC started all this mess, so let them reap what they've sewn.

TV
  • NFL: NY Giants at Washington

    Thursday at 8:25 pm on WRAL-TV

  • ACC: Western Michigan at Virginia Tech

    Saturday at 12:25 pm on WRAL-TV

  • SEC: Arkansas at Texas A&M

    Saturday at 3:30 pm on WRAL-TV

Scoreboard
Local
7:00pm Tonight
BUF
CAR
 
Final
NYY 5
BAL 0
Final
CLE 0
KAN 2
Final
TOR 14
SEA 4
Final
DET 0
CWS 2
Final
ATL 0
PIT 1
Final
TEX 4
HOU 3
Final
CHC 0
STL 8
Final
MIN 2
ARI 6
Final
OAK 8
ANA 4
Final
SDP 1
COL 0
Final
LOS 2
SFG 5
7:05pm Tonight
NYY
BAL
 
7:05pm Tonight
CLE
KAN
7:05pm Tonight
WAS
NYM
 
7:07pm Tonight
TOR
SEA
 
7:08pm Tonight
DET
CWS
 
7:10pm Tonight
CIN
MIL
 
7:10pm Tonight
MIA
PHI
 
7:10pm Tonight
ATL
PIT
 
7:10pm Tonight
BOS
TAM
 
8:05pm Tonight
TEX
HOU
 
8:05pm Tonight
CHC
STL
 
8:10pm Tonight
MIN
ARI
 
10:05pm Tonight
OAK
ANA
 
10:10pm Tonight
SDP
COL
 
10:10pm Tonight
LOS
SFG
 
Final
NYI 3
OTT 2
 
6:00pm Monday
NYI
OTT
 
Final
PIT 1
DET 2
Final
NYR 4
NJD 5
Final
PHI 2
TOR 3
 
Final
PHI 5
WAS 4
Final
WIN 2
MIN 1
Final
DAL 4
STL 3
Final
COL 2
ANA 5
Final
ANA 4
COL 0
Final
ARI 5
LOS 4
Final
LOS 4
ARI 3
7:00pm Tonight
BUF
CAR
 
7:00pm Tonight
CLB
PIT
 
7:30pm Tonight
MON
BOS
 
7:30pm Tonight
TAM
NAS
 
7:30pm Tonight
TOR
PHI
 
8:30pm Tonight
CHI
DET
 
9:00pm Tonight
VAN
SJS
 
10:00pm Tonight
ANA
ARI
 
10:30pm Tonight
SJS
VAN
 
Final
NYJ 19
CHI 27