banner
Caulton Tudor

Maryland v. ACC could have far-reaching precedent

Posted January 15

The case may take months or years to be completely decided, but Maryland’s lawsuit against the ACC will be closely monitored by colleges and their lawyers throughout the nation. At stake, potentially, is the perceived stability conferences thought they had achieved through the relatively recent arrival of grants of television rights covenants.

The ACC formed such an union in April of 2013, roughly six months after Maryland announced it would leave the league after 2013-14 to join the Big Ten, which also has a grant of rights treaty among its members. So does the Big 12 Conference. The ACC pact runs through the length of its television contract with ESPN in 2027.

In theory, grant of rights agreements bind each conference member to its partners through what roughly works like a communal banking account.

The $156.8 million lawsuit filed Tuesday by the Maryland attorney general’s office is not related to any sort of grant of rights agreement. It originated with Maryland's resistance to a $52.2 million ACC exit penalty – an agreement Maryland ratified as an ACC member in September of 2012. 

The state and the school allege that the exit penalty should not apply as a result of procedural incidents and that the ACC has no right to withhold revenue shares from the school as the case plays out. But since the crux of the suit goes to the subject of conference/school agreements, it’s not out of the question that grant of rights pacts could be tangentially affected by the eventual court ruling or even an out-of-court settlement. 

Here’s why, through a completely hypothetical example:

Let’s say UNC, just to pick an ACC school, leaves the league and is accepted as a member of the Big Ten two or three years from now.

The ACC obviously would sue, claiming its authority via the grant of rights television covenant. But in joining the Big Ten, UNC would have entered a second grant of rights union and there are few, if any, legal precedents in such matters involving television networks, colleges, conferences and chain of command. At some point, given that scenario, the NCAA would be drawn into the fray since members of both the ACC and Big Ten are also bound to NCAA agreements regarding sports eligibility.

It’s entirely possible that after a long court fight, judges could rule any number of ways:

  • UNC’s media income could be ruled to be jointly owned by the ACC and Big Ten.
  • UNC could be ruled a sovereign sports entity and the sole owner of its product rights.
  • The entire matter could be shipped directly to arbitration, thereby assuring that both conferences would suffer some degree of disappointment.
  • Both conference covenants could be ruled illegally restrictive on free trade and completely voided.

There’s an old saying that no contract is ironclad. Whether that statement is accurate or not, it’s certain that there’s no way to stop any school or any conference from suing for its freedom (in the case of a school) or antimony (conference).

If recent history has taught us anything, it’s that there is no predicting where and when the conference realignment process will go, much less where and when it will end.

The outcome of Maryland’s suit over the exit-fee issue will serve as an important indicator of how the courts will view what has become a collegiate sports wild west show, complete with border raids, shot-gun weddings and financial range wars.

Collectively, college sports has become a billion-dollar-a-year industry that shows no sign of tapering. In fact, given the current growth rate of sports marketing and likelihood that more sports-oriented media outlets will emerge as technology advances, current TV contracts could be seen as pocket change in the future.

With so much money on the table, more lawsuits are likely to flare up. That much is inevitable, which is why Maryland v. the ACC will be must-see action in the boardrooms. And, of course, for law students from the Ivies to the Pac-12.

7 Comments

This blogpost is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Steven Jan 16, 9:55 a.m.

    Maryland was sold a bill of goods thinking they were going to make more money and save them in the Big Ten. All their old rivals are going to be gone and they are going to have less folks show up for their games. They are crazy if they think the Big Ten Network is going to make them as much money as they think it will. Hope they crash and burn for abandoning the ACC and have serious regrets about it down the road. Outside of forced matchups, their old ACC rivals will never play them.

  • GunnyGoesArrrgh Jan 15, 8:58 p.m.

    I think the ACC will do everything in its power to ensure Maryland does pay the $52 Mill, as the decision in this case will set a precedent. The penalty was set high deliberately, to discourage schools from bolting. I do remember Maryland (and I believe Florida State) voted against the exit fee, but the majority of schools voted in favor of it, so it was ratified.

    I have no bad feelings toward Maryland; they are in a terrible financial bind and leaving the ACC seemed like a viable solution to their financial woes.

    This situation has the potential to get quite ugly before it's over, and that's a shame, because there will be no winners, only bitter feelings and more financial issues.

  • 903 Hail Providence Jan 15, 6:42 p.m.

    The ACC was at the forefront of "conference raiding". Thanks to them, the Big East Conference... View More

    — Posted by cjw6105

    Would you rather have had the Big East raid the ACC and survive and then have the ACC deteriorate to the American conference or whatever it is? (Gtown, Butler, Nova and a bunch of other mid-majors)?

  • Ken D. Jan 15, 4:53 p.m.

    It originated with Maryland's resistance to a $52.2 million ACC exit penalty – an agreement Maryland ratified as an ACC member in September of 2012.

    Maryland did not "ratify" this provision. It opposed it, and did not vote for it. Maryland has claimed in its countersuit that league rules do not allow the conference to impose this penalty immediately upon achieving a favorable vote. I don't know if this claim is, in fact, true. Maryland gave official notice of its intent to leave the conference four days before the date the Terps claim the rule could first be effective.

    I expect the outcome of this case to be determined on such contractual issues, unless it is first settled out of court. Frankly, I think it's in everybody's interest (except maybe fans) that there be a negotiated settlement. Nobody should want any precedents established.

  • Ken D. Jan 15, 4:40 p.m.

    Antimony? Where did you get that word, Mr. Tudor? Are you sure you don't mean something like hegemony instead?

  • baldchip Jan 15, 4:10 p.m.

    University of Maryland-you signed the contract with the other Universities in the ACC !! I guess that does not matter any more. Humm-I wonder what folks at your Law School would say to that. Is the integrity of the University of Maryland that poor???

    That being said-I'm glad you're leaving. Aamen-Aamen!!! Just pay up before you leave-or all the ACC will haunt you forever!!

  • cjw6105 Jan 15, 2:28 p.m.

    The ACC was at the forefront of "conference raiding". Thanks to them, the Big East Conference exists primarily on the basketball court. And ACC football, never much to begin with, is now even weaker than before, with more rivalries being destroyed in order to make sure everybody gets "equal" treatment.

    I've never been much of a Maryland fan, but this is one time I'm pulling for the Terps. The ACC started all this mess, so let them reap what they've sewn.

  • HSFB: Football Friday with Tom Suiter

    Tonight at 11:35 on WRAL-TV

  • ACC: NC State at UNC

    Tomorrow at 12:58 pm on WRAL-TV

  • SEC: Mississippi State at Ole Miss

    Tomorrow at 3:30 pm on WRAL-TV

  • NFL: San Diego at Baltimore

    Sunday at 1:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • CFB: NC State at UNC

    Tomorrow at 12:30 pm on WRAL-FM

Scoreboard
Local
Final
NCCU 65
EILL 40
Final
NCSU 60
BSU 54
Final
PIT 2
CAR 4
Final
CHA 101
GSW 106
Final
UF 64
UNC 75
 
3rd
TULSA 14
ECU 21
 
Final
BOS 102
CHI 109
Final
CHA 101
GSW 106
Final
TOR 102
DAL 106
 
Final
DET 88
MIL 104
 
Final
ATL 100
NOP 91
 
Final
HOU 85
LAC 102
 
Final
OKC 105
NYK 78
 
Final
IND 98
ORL 83
 
4th
SAN 102
SAC 88
 
3rd
DEN 77
PHO 55
 
2nd
POR 25
MEM 23
 
10:30pm Tonight
LAL
MIN
Final
WMICH 21
NILL 31
Final
SMU 9
HOU 35
Final
IOWA 34
NEB 37
Final
SFLA 0
UCF 16
Final
MARS 66
WKENT 67
Final
KSU 27
AKR 24
Final
BGU 24
BST 41
Final
UMASS 21
BUF 41
Final
EMICH 16
TOL 52
Final
MIZZ 21
ARK 14
Final
SALABAMA 40
NAVY 42
Final
ARZ 42
ARST 35
Final
AFA 27
COLST 24
Final
UCLA 10
STAN 31
3rd
VT 10
UVA 13
 
3rd
TULSA 14
ECU 21
 
Final
NCCU 65
EILL 40
Final
KU 82
TENN 67
Final
TEXAM 87
NO 65
 
Final
NCAT 57
RAD 65
 
Final
GEOR 58
BUT 64
Final
BRO 81
PVU 71
Final
RIU 66
SCU 44
Final
NARZ 70
SOUTH 63
Final
DART 68
MAST 67
Final
WRST 59
FIU 61
Final
XAV 73
UTEP 77
Final
OSU 73
JMU 56
Final
TXSOU 71
LAM 59
 
Final
TAMCC 75
MVSU 66
 
Final
AKAN 51
MIZST 55
Final
BUCK 80
PSU 88
 
Final
PROV 72
YALE 66
Final
UGA 62
MINN 66
Final
WISC 69
OKLA 56
Final
Terriers 70
NORST 72
 
Final
PEAY 62
STEPH 83
Final
FSU 58
CSOU 47
 
Final
VALPO 66
DRAK 46
Final
CIN 69
MTST 51
Final
SDU 75
PRIN 65
Final
WASU 76
RICE 74
Final
CSFU 64
USCU 79
Final
GT 61
RIDE 54
 
Final
TXPA 79
ALAST 91
Final
NCSU 60
BSU 54
Final
TCU 57
BRAD 49
 
Final
WAKE 65
DELST 72
 
Final
HART 83
EMERSON 50
 
Final
STJ 66
GONZ 73
 
Final
CLEM 62
HIGH 59
 
Final
SYR 72
HC 48
 
Final
MD 61
MON 56
Final
JVST 74
SAV 71
 
Final
MIAMI 87
SALA 75
Final
RUTG 68
VANDY 65
 
Final
PETE 66
TENST 58
 
Final
MARS 59
CLST 68
 
Final
JST 56
HOF 86
 
Final
INDST 62
MEM 72
 
Final
UF 64
UNC 75
 
Final
LATU 77
SAMF 64
 
Final
TULA 71
SELA 61
 
Final
NEB 75
TENNM 64
 
Final
MISS 75
CREI 68
 
Final
PORT 64
MURST 61
 
2nd
MARQ 49
MSU 65
 
2nd
ARK 57
UNT 56
 
2nd
NCOL 67
STET 50
 
2nd
IND 68
UNCG 54
 
2nd
SJST 42
WMICH 61
 
2nd
MNTST 75
TXARL 55
 
Half
UVA 37
LAS 19
 
Half
STLU 27
MSST 37
 
Half
COLST 43
PAC 26
 
1st
UTAH 22
NDAK 12
 
10:30pm Tonight
ILL
BAY
10:30pm Tonight
UAB
UCLA
11:30pm Tonight
WASH
LBSU
11:59pm Tonight
UCSB
MERC
Final
PHI 0
NYR 3
Final
ANA 1
CHI 4
Final
WAS 5
NYI 2
Final
PIT 2
CAR 4
Final
NJD 4
DET 5
 
Final
BUF 2
MON 1
 
Final
CLB 0
VAN 5
 
Final
BOS 2
WIN 1
 
Final
FLA 3
OTT 2
 
3rd
STL 3
EDM 3
 
3rd
DAL 3
MIN 3