99.9 FM The Fan ESPN
On Now: Stormfront with Mike Maniscalco
620 AM The Buzz
On Now: MBB: Duke @ UNC
My Teams
Log in to WRALSportsfan with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRALSportsfan account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRALSportsfan using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRALSportsfan account using our web form.

MLB

Confidentiality of previous steroids tests a concern for players?


Feb 25, 2009

comments
POST VIEW

The off-season didn't disappoint when Alex Rodriguez admitted to using a banned substance from 2001-03.  His name fell in line with several of the games greatest players that have been linked to using performance enhancing drugs in the past decade. 

Major League Baseball instituted mandatory random drug tests starting in 2004.  The players and owners agreed to harsher penalties for positive tests.

With the recent leak of Rodriguez's positive drug test, players have expressed concern about the testing that took place in 2003.

Donald Fehr, executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Association, met with the media in Port Charlotte, Fla., and talked about how many players who were not in the league in 2003 and 2004 are not familiar with that agreement (steroid testing in 2003).

"We go through that with them, answer their questions and try to explain to them what happened here," Fehr said. "The reaction is different altogether, I think there are some people that, as I do, wish the complete confidentiality could have been maintained."

Fehr is confident that the game can move past the steroids cloud that has covered the sport with a little help from the media.

"The coverage has to become fundamentally more comprehensive and fundamentally more fair," Fehr said.

Jokingly, Fehr urged writers not to write that he hates the press, but did convey what he meant by being comprehensive.

"When somebody writes a story about 2003 it seems to me only fair to say 'first of all this happened several years ago, secondly there's different systems in effect now, third there is no reason to believe that what happened then is or could be happening now'."

Even Fehr himself feels that although this steroids era hasn't been good, the game hasn't been "irrevocably damaged" either.

 "I think that baseball is a game of such enormous appeal that it will continue to have appeal," Fehr said. "I think attendence and revenue in the last several years has demonstrated that."

The Fan's Dave Shore is in Port Charlotte, FL covering spring training for the Tampa Bay Rays.

 

Most Recent Comments

RE: Confidentiality of previous steroids tests a concern for players?

I'am totally glad that the heros are being held accountable finally. Why did they want to ask the questions, and then come forth with information. This is the question. But, for those that cheat....I hope that all are found out soon.
Talk Smack Forums: Most Popular

Most Popular Topics

  1. Using the transitive property.... Duke would beat unc by 30 in Tallahassee!!View the latest post
    Updated 24 minutes ago
  2. Technician's Power Rankings.....View the latest post
    Updated 36 minutes ago
  3. Henson added to ALL-Classless teamView the latest post
    Updated 40 minutes ago
  4. Only what's pertinentView the latest post
    Updated 51 minutes ago
  5. Larry's New DaddyView the latest post
    Updated 58 minutes ago
MORE TOPICS
Scoreboard
*
More FANkind…
Columnists
More Columnists

EMAIL CENTER

Click your team's logo to sign up

State unc Duke Hurricanes small logo 53x32 Bulls

 

Headlines Alerts