RE: Seth Greenberg straight up dissed state!
Nice try. A clear argument was made, I clearly refuted the
given argument, which forced you to introduce points irrelevent to the original argument, as you continued to do in your most recent response. Pithy enough for you?
And my god... if my use of simple everyday words from the english language seems somehow sesquipedalian to you, then how in hades did you ever get past english 101?
And you wonder why I chose the cartoon version?
RE: Seth Greenberg straight up dissed state!
Nice try. A clear argument was made, I clearly refuted the given argument, which forced you to introduce points irrelevent to the original argument, as you continued to do in your most recent response. Pithy enough for you?
And my god... if my use of simple everyday words from the english language seems somehow sesquipedalian to you, then how in hades did you ever get past english 101?
And you wonder why I chose the cartoon version?
- Posted by barthc98
Poor barf. How can you refute the irrefutable? Your red herring argument (rofl I bet you use that phrase in everyday speak) makes zilch sense. You remind me of one of those guys who strings a bunch of well worded but convoluted thoughts together in an English paper you write the night before its due and get a C- on it. If you just say that ur a lunatic fringer that thinks your state team is an elite squad irregardless of the fact they have played ONE good game this season I'll let you off the hook. Your if....then scientific experiments and weeded out philosophical debate skills makes you look like someone trying to be pompous but hasnt the critical thinking skills to follow up on even that negative yet provocative trait. Again I beg you try harder. Afterall you are merely talking to a basement living troll.....
RE: Seth Greenberg straight up dissed state!
Well, at least you found the truth with your last sentence. And it is certainly no "great reveal" that logic rings hollow in your "ears". I am embarrased for you.
You are obviously incapable of understanding the original post that you yourself made, and seek instead to introduce your own subjective arguments in its stead.
Is State elite? Maybe. Maybe not. BUT!!! ... YOUR original post simply can not only be applied to state, and therefore must apply to all other schools that lose such games. Simple, simple, brutally simple logic. Period.
RE: Seth Greenberg straight up dissed state!
Well, at least you found the truth with your last sentence. And it is certainly no "great reveal" that logic rings hollow in your "ears". I am embarrased for you.
You are obviously incapable of understanding the original post that you yourself made, and seek instead to introduce your own subjective arguments in its stead.
Is State elite? Maybe. Maybe not. BUT!!! ... YOUR original post simply can not only be applied to state, and therefore must apply to all other schools that lose such games. Simple, simple, brutally simple logic. Period.
- Posted by barthc98
It sure could be applied to other schools. Link proving otherwise? My last sentence was a jab at your fellow fanbases only retort to me at times. I'd tell you to keep up but thats been a given in this convo.
RE: Seth Greenberg straight up dissed state!
Which part of Greenberg's wasn't, WolfbackindaTIZZY4shizzy?
- Posted by Hans
Mainly the part about you should beat Wake Forest at home. While they haven't played a strong home schedule, they are still 3-0 at home in conference play. So until somebody beats them at home, don't see how you should beat them at home. Fact is that it is a real stupid statement, just about all the ACC teams stand a chance of winning at home.
