Seth Greenberg straight up dissed state!
rherring23 Jan 25, 8:13 p.m.
Mainly the part about you should beat Wake Forest at home. While they haven't played a strong home schedule, they are still 3-0 at home in conference play. So until somebody beats them at home, don't see how you should beat them at home. Fact is that it is a real stupid statement, just about all the ACC teams stand a chance of winning at home.
ReasonableJacobSummers Jan 25, 3:29 p.m.
It sure could be applied to other schools. Link proving otherwise? My last sentence was a jab at your fellow fanbases only retort to me at times. I'd tell you to keep up but thats been a given in this convo.
barthc98 Jan 25, 2:44 p.m.
Well, at least you found the truth with your last sentence. And it is certainly no "great reveal" that logic rings hollow in your "ears". I am embarrased for you.
You are obviously incapable of understanding the original post that you yourself made, and seek instead to introduce your own subjective arguments in its stead.
Is State elite? Maybe. Maybe not. BUT!!! ... YOUR original post simply can not only be applied to state, and therefore must apply to all other schools that lose such games. Simple, simple, brutally simple logic. Period.
ReasonableJacobSummers Jan 25, 2:19 p.m.
Poor barf. How can you refute the irrefutable? Your red herring argument (rofl I bet you use that phrase in everyday speak) makes zilch sense. You remind me of one of those guys who strings a bunch of well worded but convoluted thoughts together in an English paper you write the night before its due and get a C- on it. If you just say that ur a lunatic fringer that thinks your state team is an elite squad irregardless of the fact they have played ONE good game this season I'll let you off the hook. Your if....then scientific experiments and weeded out philosophical debate skills makes you look like someone trying to be pompous but hasnt the critical thinking skills to follow up on even that negative yet provocative trait. Again I beg you try harder. Afterall you are merely talking to a basement living troll.....
barthc98 Jan 25, 2:02 p.m.
Nice try. A clear argument was made, I clearly refuted the given argument, which forced you to introduce points irrelevent to the original argument, as you continued to do in your most recent response. Pithy enough for you?
And my god... if my use of simple everyday words from the english language seems somehow sesquipedalian to you, then how in hades did you ever get past english 101?
And you wonder why I chose the cartoon version?
ReasonableJacobSummers Jan 25, 1:44 p.m.
I realize barf you seem to be a legend in your own mind. Let me help you. Elite teams lose all the time ( by all the time I mean Michigan here, Louisville there, and Indiana here). Elite teams don't lose here lose there lose everywhere. So use as many multisyllabic words as you can muster to string together a shallow and elementary philosophy lesson but point being and point always been: state isn't an elite team. Please dont let me take you to task anymore. Could you link The Fox and the Hound cartoon next? That cheap ripoff you provided didn't come close. Thanks so much.
barthc98 Jan 25, 12:52 p.m.
As the original argument was that State is not elite by virtue of having lost to Wake, you yourself refute your own argument with the first sentence of your statement.... which is essentially in agreement with the refutations i made.
You then introduced red herring arguments in the form of claims about the fan base, allusions to previous Pack teams, and a claim that the pack is losing " regularly" now.... none of which, even if true, are relevent to thd initial argument, and are thus red herrings.
SO: The promised primer:
Now pay attention in class, and don't let any punk pretenders take the rest of your lunch money....'K?
ReasonableJacobSummers Jan 25, 2:09 a.m.
State wont be top 25 come Monday so no elite they are not. Thats if I agree with your theory of top 25 being elite. I don't. State will be lucky to finish top 4 in the acc this year. Im smelling a Thursday acc game for ya come march
ReasonableJacobSummers Jan 25, 2:04 a.m.
Just 24 hours ago you would've said dook was an elite team with that Bull snot number one ranking. Miami mad sure that myth got debunked.
barthc98 Jan 25, 1:37 a.m.
This may prove to be true by the strictest of standards.. although Michigan , Kansas, and Florida may be a close approximation by the time it's said and done... Of course the wheels could fall off at one or all of those schools too. If Duke getz kelly back it might fit in there too. "Elite" is subjective. Is top 25 elite? Sweet 16, the 8, the 4, the 2, or only (or even) the ultimate NC? I tend to think that top 25 out of 347 div 1 schools is pretty "elite" territory.
#6 Az lost tonight.... by 11 at home to UCLA.... another pretty "elite" team losing a shoulda...
Please sign in to post.
Polls justifiably baffle Duke, ECU fansCaulton Tudor
Letter to the new commissionerAdam Gold
The Mitchell Report: Defense of Stewart and struggling JoshMandy Mitchell
App State starts season at site of biggest victoryCaulton Tudor
— Tue 11:46 p.m.
— Tue 11:46 p.m.
— Tue 11:46 p.m.
— Tue 10:31 p.m.
— Tue 10:00 p.m.
— Tue 9:54 p.m.
— Tue 9:50 p.m.
— Tue 9:31 p.m.
— Tue 9:15 p.m.
— Tue 9:14 p.m.
— Tue 8:45 p.m.
— Tue 8:43 p.m.
— Tue 8:41 p.m.
— Tue 8:38 p.m.
— Tue 8:36 p.m.
— Tue 8:17 p.m.
— Tue 8:14 p.m.
— Tue 8:14 p.m.
— Tue 8:12 p.m.