Adam Gold

Never too early to talk college football

Posted June 13, 2013

Is it college football season yet?

No? Man, it's too hot already outside, and I'm jonesing for the start of the season so we can finally see how this new playoff is going to work.

What? Oh, we're still a year away from that. That's right, we've got one more year under the old Bowl Championship Series. Next year is when everything changes for the better.

Yeah, not so much, I'm afraid.

The four-team College Football Playoff goes into effect after the 2014 season and will NOT dramatically alter the college football landscape. In fact, it will be very hard to notice a tangible difference at all, unless you're the third and fourth teams in the final standings. In theory, the two teams that will be the next-best in this year's final BCS rankings would slot into a semifinal matchup were the system already in place. So, it's not really a playoff at all, it's just an extra game.

I can't think of a playoff that starts in the semifinals.

However, it IS better than the system that we have because we've yet to figure out a way to honor more than two major conference undefeated teams.

Auburn was denied a national championship shot in 2004 in spite of an undefeated season and an SEC title. No way on this, or any other, planet that would happen today, but it did nine years ago. The best part of the four-team system is that it is highly unlikely that this will ever happen again.

The next best part of the "playoff" is that there will be a human selection committee, much like we see in basketball, baseball and the other sports that have larger tournaments. However, the NCAA has yet to define the makeup of that group or the criteria they will be asked to consider. And, to me, this is going to be a major problem.

If the committee is made up of conference commissioners and directors of athletics, like all of the other NCAA selection committees, we're going to have a constant battle over the fairness of the system. We all know that the SEC is, by miles, the dominant conference in college football. Four SEC schools have won the last seven national championships, and four more that didn't have recently finished in the top ten of the final polls.

That is across-the-board butt kicking.

But, you know that ADs and officials from the B1G and the ACC and the Pac-12 and the Big XII don't want to see two or three teams from the SEC in the playoff, no matter how deserving they may be, so we're going to have a heated debate over favoring conference champions. This is going to create a very real problem for the playoff. Especially at the outset, the one element that the new system needs is credibility, and if we arrive in January of 2015 with anything less than the four best teams duking it out for the championship – the FIRST college football championship of this era – then the sport will be looked at as the loser.

The whole reason for a playoff, even this four-team version, is to eliminate the controversy. And, as we've seen in both basketball and baseball selections in recent years, in those committee rooms – or in limousines on the ride to committee rooms – deals get made. We can't allow that to happen if we want this to be a trusted system, unless they want to scrap the model already and just open it up to eight teams which will allow cover for the league officials to favor some conference champs and still not deny those truly deserving of a shot at the title.

Since we've been told that expanding the field is not on the table – though I promise you it's coming in the next contract – getting correct both the committee and the criteria to be considered is paramount. Whom do we trust to make the right call on the teams?

Conference commissioners and athletic directors? Aren't they busy doing other things, like commissioning and directing athletics?

Current coaches? You know, the coaches' poll has always been an integral part of the BCS formula? (Sticks finger down throat)

What about national media members whose job it is to cover the entirety of the sport? People like national college football writer/commentator Tony Barnhardt, or CBSSports.com's Dennis Dodd, or ESPN's Chris Fowler and Kirk Herbstreit, though that would probably eliminate the Mid-American Conference champion.

If we're just choosing four teams, there's no way to remove doubt unless you utilize people without allegiances. Everyone has biases, we all went to school somewhere, but coaches, athletic directors and conference commissioners have at least an indirect financial stake in who gets into the final four, and that element must be removed.

In a recent conversation with Kevin White, Duke's very candid director of athletics, I asked him if he wanted to be on the committee and should conference champions be given strong consideration.

His two answers: "Absolutely not" and "absolutely not.'" He had no interest in devoting that amount of time to that process, and we agreed that the only way this system works is if the four best teams are thrown into the ring to see who climbs out with the belt. If the best four teams all hail from the same conference, then that's who should play. Anything short of that is a hit at the veracity of the system.

And, in year one, even though we're a year away, the most vital piece of the equation is that we truly believe they got it right.

34 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • StunGunn Jun 14, 2013

    View quoted thread


    I'm a fan of one of the "blue" schools, but I agree with you completely. At the very lease the Big Four should play each other every year; for State to play Duke once and then not until 2020 is ridiculous. It's one thing to expand and realign the ACC, but to eliminate local rival games is a terrible decision IMHO.

  • rherring23 Jun 13, 2013

    View quoted thread


    Hum, App St is not a mid-major, they are a division 2 school. But saying that they would not belong, questionable. During their back to back championships and undefeated season they beat Michigan at Michigan, something a lot of those teams you say belong couldn't do. So that means Michigan doesn't belong? During those years App St could have beaten most of the teams you say belong in the championship.

  • VT1994Hokie Jun 13, 2013

    ^^^ You maybe outlined a decent deal. It was difficult to read though.

  • ncaa2014playoff Jun 13, 2013

    ND doesn't play and never has played an FCS Patsy like everybody else but TX. So they belonged in a playoff for the National Championship. So did Alabama even though they lost to A&M. The super sized conferences with the divisions and Conference Championship game are not built to really separate out the best for a playoff. Divide them up. Like the SEC should be 3 football only 10 team conferences fleshed out with 4 mid major teams.
    East: FL, GA, KY, So Car, TN, Vandy, LA T, Mid TN, UL Lafayette, UL Monroe;
    South: AL, Auburn, LSU, MS, MS St., TAMU, Houston, Rice, So MS, Tulane;
    Border: Arkansas, Missouri, ND, Cincinnati, Louisville, Arkansas St., Ball State, Kent St., Memphis, W. KY.;
    Divide ACC, B1G, B12 & PAC into 2 conferences of 10 teams. Then remake the American (old Big East) into BC, Conn, MD, Rutgers, Temple, W VA, Army, Navy, Akron & Marshall.
    The season should be only 11 games, 9 conference & 2 non-conference major teams.
    You now have 12 Conferences of 10 teams (120 total) with the Mid Majors (weaker schools) now in conferences that mean something so they can share the money and recruits because they play in a Power Conference. All 12 Champs go to the 16 Team Playoff along with the 4 second place teams with the most wins. Done all the problems are cured. No more Patsy Games with FCS teams no more expansion with FCS teams, sorry S. Alabama, Mass, GA St., TX St., UTSA, ODU, App St., So GA & Charlotte but you don't belong, wait till some of the weaker schools don't keep up and you can replace them when they are dropped down to FCS. Go check it out at ncaa2012.com/theperfectplan.pdf

  • BattlingBishop 5 Jun 13, 2013

    Ready for some football as well.

  • JPack Jun 13, 2013

    View quoted thread


    no ND did not beat them. ND did not play them. Don't know what you were watching but it wasn't football.

  • sburks1906 Jun 13, 2013

    Long live college football! I am looking forward to seeing the new ACC this fall.
    http://www.theklowntimes.net

  • cjw6105 Jun 13, 2013

    I couldn't care less about how many teams are in a college football playoff that most ACC schools will never be a part of. All I want is for my team (Pack) to play Duke, Georgia Tech, Virginia and Virginia Tech each season or at least every other season, not just once every 10 or 12 years.

    The ACC we are mutating into is one which I don't want to be a part of anymore. I honestly believe that teams like the Wolfpack would be better off being an independent. At least we could schedule teams that our fans wanted to play, and not be controlled by an arrogant bunch whose main interests bleed blue.

  • VT1994Hokie Jun 13, 2013

    A good many well written statements. I'm looking forward to a new football season. Hoping Logan Thomas can have a solid season. Go Hokies.

  • DUKE4EVER Jun 13, 2013

    GO DUKE!!

More...

 

 

  • The Ryder Cup

    Saturday at 9:00 am on WRAL-TV

  • CFB: Duke vs. Virginia

    Saturday at 12:30 pm on FOX50

  • CFB: Oklahoma vs. TCU

    Saturday at 5:00 pm on FOX50

  • CFB: Arizona State at USC

    Saturday at 8:00 pm on FOX50

  • The Logan Zone

    Sunday at 11:00 am on WRAL-TV

  • The Ryder Cup

    Sunday at 12:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • NFL: Panthers at Atlanta

    Sunday at 1:00 pm on FOX50

  • NFL: Kansas City at Pittsburgh

    Sunday at 8:20 pm on WRAL-TV

  • CFB: NC State vs. Wake Forest

    Saturday at 3:30 pm on WRAL-FM

AP Top 25
Thu, Sept 29
5:00 PT6:00 MT7:00 CT8:00 ET12:00 GMT8:00 北京时间5:00 MST7:00 EST
Preview
6
Fri, Sept 30
7
6:00 PT7:00 MT8:00 CT9:00 ET1:00 GMT9:00 北京时间6:00 MST8:00 EST
Preview
10
Sat, Oct 1
9:00 PT10:00 MT11:00 CT12:00 ET4:00 GMT12:00 北京时间9:00 MST11:00 EST
20
 
14
9:00 PT10:00 MT11:00 CT12:00 ET4:00 GMT12:00 北京时间9:00 MST11:00 EST
 
13
9:00 PT10:00 MT11:00 CT12:00 ET4:00 GMT12:00 北京时间9:00 MST11:00 EST
 
9:00 PT10:00 MT11:00 CT12:00 ET4:00 GMT12:00 北京时间9:00 MST11:00 EST
2
 
22
9:00 PT10:00 MT11:00 CT12:00 ET4:00 GMT12:00 北京时间9:00 MST11:00 EST
 
23
9:00 PT10:00 MT11:00 CT12:00 ET4:00 GMT12:00 北京时间9:00 MST11:00 EST
Preview
 
12:30 PT1:30 MT2:30 CT3:30 ET7:30 GMT3:30 北京时间12:30 MST2:30 EST
12
 
11
12:30 PT1:30 MT2:30 CT3:30 ET7:30 GMT3:30 北京时间12:30 MST2:30 EST
25
 
8
12:30 PT1:30 MT2:30 CT3:30 ET7:30 GMT3:30 北京时间12:30 MST2:30 EST
4
 
12:30 PT1:30 MT2:30 CT3:30 ET7:30 GMT3:30 北京时间12:30 MST2:30 EST
15
 
9
1:00 PT2:00 MT3:00 CT4:00 ET8:00 GMT4:00 北京时间1:00 MST3:00 EST
 
2:00 PT3:00 MT4:00 CT5:00 ET9:00 GMT5:00 北京时间2:00 MST4:00 EST
21
 
18
3:00 PT4:00 MT5:00 CT6:00 ET10:00 GMT6:00 北京时间3:00 MST5:00 EST
 
4:00 PT5:00 MT6:00 CT7:00 ET11:00 GMT7:00 北京时间4:00 MST6:00 EST
1
 
4:00 PT5:00 MT6:00 CT7:00 ET11:00 GMT7:00 北京时间4:00 MST6:00 EST
16
 
3
5:00 PT6:00 MT7:00 CT8:00 ET12:00 GMT8:00 北京时间5:00 MST7:00 EST
Preview
5
 
17
5:00 PT6:00 MT7:00 CT8:00 ET12:00 GMT8:00 北京时间5:00 MST7:00 EST
 
19
5:00 PT6:00 MT7:00 CT8:00 ET12:00 GMT8:00 北京时间5:00 MST7:00 EST
 
7:15 PT8:15 MT9:15 CT10:15 ET2:15 GMT10:15 北京时间7:15 MST9:15 EST
24
 
NFL Scoreboard
Thursday, Sep. 29
Miami 5:25 PT6:25 MT7:25 CT8:25 ET0:25 GMT8:25 北京时间5:25 MST7:25 EST7:25 CT4:25 UAE (+1)20:25 ET23:25
Cincinnati 
Sunday, Oct. 2
Indianapolis 6:30 PT7:30 MT8:30 CT9:30 ET13:30 GMT9:30 北京时间6:30 MST8:30 EST8:30 CT17:30 UAE9:30 ET12:30
Jacksonville 
 
Carolina 10:00 PT11:00 MT12:00 CT1:00 ET17:00 GMT1:00 北京时间10:00 MST12:00 EST12:00 CT21:00 UAE13:00 ET16:00
Atlanta 
 
Oakland 10:00 PT11:00 MT12:00 CT1:00 ET17:00 GMT1:00 北京时间10:00 MST12:00 EST12:00 CT21:00 UAE13:00 ET16:00
Baltimore 
 
Detroit 10:00 PT11:00 MT12:00 CT1:00 ET17:00 GMT1:00 北京时间10:00 MST12:00 EST12:00 CT21:00 UAE13:00 ET16:00
Chicago 
 
Tennessee 10:00 PT11:00 MT12:00 CT1:00 ET17:00 GMT1:00 北京时间10:00 MST12:00 EST12:00 CT21:00 UAE13:00 ET16:00
Houston 
 
Buffalo 10:00 PT11:00 MT12:00 CT1:00 ET17:00 GMT1:00 北京时间10:00 MST12:00 EST12:00 CT21:00 UAE13:00 ET16:00
New England 
 
Seattle 10:00 PT11:00 MT12:00 CT1:00 ET17:00 GMT1:00 北京时间10:00 MST12:00 EST12:00 CT21:00 UAE13:00 ET16:00
NY Jets 
 
Cleveland 10:00 PT11:00 MT12:00 CT1:00 ET17:00 GMT1:00 北京时间10:00 MST12:00 EST12:00 CT21:00 UAE13:00 ET16:00
Washington 
 
Denver 1:05 PT2:05 MT3:05 CT4:05 ET20:05 GMT4:05 北京时间1:05 MST3:05 EST3:05 CT0:05 UAE (+1)16:05 ET19:05
Tampa Bay 
 
Los Angeles 1:25 PT2:25 MT3:25 CT4:25 ET20:25 GMT4:25 北京时间1:25 MST3:25 EST3:25 CT0:25 UAE (+1)16:25 ET19:25
Arizona 
 
New Orleans 1:25 PT2:25 MT3:25 CT4:25 ET20:25 GMT4:25 北京时间1:25 MST3:25 EST3:25 CT0:25 UAE (+1)16:25 ET19:25
San Diego 
 
Dallas 1:25 PT2:25 MT3:25 CT4:25 ET20:25 GMT4:25 北京时间1:25 MST3:25 EST3:25 CT0:25 UAE (+1)16:25 ET19:25
San Francisco 
 
Kansas City 5:30 PT6:30 MT7:30 CT8:30 ET0:30 GMT8:30 北京时间5:30 MST7:30 EST7:30 CT4:30 UAE (+1)20:30 ET23:30
Pittsburgh 
Monday, Oct. 3
NY Giants 5:30 PT6:30 MT7:30 CT8:30 ET0:30 GMT8:30 北京时间5:30 MST7:30 EST7:30 CT4:30 UAE (+1)20:30 ET23:30
Minnesota 
 
Minor League Baseball
International League
El Paso 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET12:05 GMT
Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 
 
TOUR Championship (PGA)
PosNameScoreThru
1R. McIlroy - z-12F
2tR. Moore - y-12F
2tK. Chappell - y-12F
4P. Casey-9F
5H. Matsuyama-6F
6tJ. Thomas-5F
6tD. Johnson-5F
8tA. Scott-4F
8tJ. Dufner-4F
10tS. Kim-2F
View Full Leaderboard
z = Won in Playoff   y = Lost in Playoff
 
Evian Champ (LPGA)
PosNameScoreThru
1I. Chun-21F
2tS. Park-17F
2tS. Ryu-17F
4S. Feng-15F
5S. Kim-14F
6I. Kim-12F
7A. Stanford-10F
8H. Nomura-9F
9tB. Henderson-7F
9tA. Jutanugarn-7F
View Full Leaderboard
 
European Open (EURO)
PosNameScoreThru
1A. Levy - z-19F
2R. Fisher - y-19F
3tM. Jonzon-16F
3tR. Karlsson-16F
5B. Wiesberger-15F
6M. Kaymer-14F
7tR. Bland-13F
7tE. De La Riva-13F
7tF. Fritsch-13F
7tG. Havret-13F
View Full Leaderboard
z = Won in Playoff   y = Lost in Playoff
 
Pacific Links (CHMP)
PosNameScoreThru
1C. Montgomerie - z-15F
2S. McCarron - y-15F
3tM. Jimenez-13F
3tJ. Sluman-13F
3tS. Dunlap-13F
3tD. Garwood-13F
7tB. Langer-12F
7tM. Dawson-12F
7tO. Browne-12F
10tF. Funk-11F
View Full Leaderboard
z = Won in Playoff   y = Lost in Playoff
 
ATP Scoreboard
Tuesday, Sep. 27
Chengdu Open (ATP)
First Round
D. Lajovic1 6 6   
F. Delbonis6 3 4   
Y. Lu6 6    
R. Stepanek3 4    
(7) J. Sousa63 3    
K. Khachanov77 6    
A. Mannarino6 62 6   
D. Kudla4 77 4   
(8) P. Lorenzi6 3 6   
J. Millman4 6 1   
K. Anderson6 6    
J. Thompson2 4    
(5) A. Ramos-Vino6 5 3   
M. Berrer4 7 1   
M. Baghdatis65 77 5   
P. Carreno Bu77 65 5   
(6) V. Troicki6 3    
C. Ruud3 2    
 
Shenzhen Open (ATP)
First Round
(8) J. Vesely6 710    
P. Andujar2 68    
M. Jaziri6 77    
S. Robert3 65    
G. Garcia-Lop5 4    
R. Harrison7 6    
M. Kukushkin6 62 77   
L. Rosol3 77 64   
I. Cervantes6 77    
A. Santillan2 65    
(6) B. Paire65 7 6   
N. Basilashvi77 5 3   
J. Tipsarevic77 6    
Z. Zhang63 4    
G. Elias3 3    
T. Bellucci6 6    
 
WTA Scoreboard
Tuesday, Sep. 27
Wuhan Tennis Open (WTA)
Second Round
(9) S. Kuznetsova6 6    
M. Brengle0 4    
(3) A. Radwanska6 6    
E. Makarova4 1    
(13) R. Vinci5 2    
Y. Shvedova7 6    
(14) P. Kvitova6 6    
E. Svitolina3 1    
L. Chirico1 1    
D. Kasatkina6 6    
(1) A. Kerber64 6 6   
K. Mladenovic77 1 4   
M. Doi7 0 2   
B. Strycova5 6 6   
(8) M. Keys6 6    
C. Garcia3 4    
(6) V. Williams6 6    
Y. Putintseva3 2    
(10) D. Cibulkova2 6 6   
L. Siegemund6 3 4   
C. Wozniacki6 6    
K. Siniakova4 4    
(11) J. Konta6 6    
S. Zhang3 3    
(2) G. Muguruza4 62    
J. Jankovic6 77    
 
Tashkent Open (WTA)
First Round
R. Ozaki3 6 6   
E. Kostova6 4 1   
I. Khromachev4 6 6   
T. Martincova6 3 3   
(8) N. Broady6 7    
A. Sadikovic4 5    
(3) C. Buyukakcay1 4    
S. Shapatava6 6    
P. Tig4 6 6   
V. Diatchenko6 4 3   
(6) L. Tsurenko6 6    
E. Rodina0 2    
(7) S. Cirstea5 2    
F. Schiavone7 6    
K. Pliskova6 3 6   
S. Sorribes T3 6 4   
I. Soylu6 6    
S. Soler-Espi0 2    
K. Kozlova6 77    
D. Vekic1 63    
(2) K. Flipkens79 6    
A. Bogdan67 3