Adam Gold

Never too early to talk college football

Posted June 13, 2013

Is it college football season yet?

No? Man, it's too hot already outside, and I'm jonesing for the start of the season so we can finally see how this new playoff is going to work.

What? Oh, we're still a year away from that. That's right, we've got one more year under the old Bowl Championship Series. Next year is when everything changes for the better.

Yeah, not so much, I'm afraid.

The four-team College Football Playoff goes into effect after the 2014 season and will NOT dramatically alter the college football landscape. In fact, it will be very hard to notice a tangible difference at all, unless you're the third and fourth teams in the final standings. In theory, the two teams that will be the next-best in this year's final BCS rankings would slot into a semifinal matchup were the system already in place. So, it's not really a playoff at all, it's just an extra game.

I can't think of a playoff that starts in the semifinals.

However, it IS better than the system that we have because we've yet to figure out a way to honor more than two major conference undefeated teams.

Auburn was denied a national championship shot in 2004 in spite of an undefeated season and an SEC title. No way on this, or any other, planet that would happen today, but it did nine years ago. The best part of the four-team system is that it is highly unlikely that this will ever happen again.

The next best part of the "playoff" is that there will be a human selection committee, much like we see in basketball, baseball and the other sports that have larger tournaments. However, the NCAA has yet to define the makeup of that group or the criteria they will be asked to consider. And, to me, this is going to be a major problem.

If the committee is made up of conference commissioners and directors of athletics, like all of the other NCAA selection committees, we're going to have a constant battle over the fairness of the system. We all know that the SEC is, by miles, the dominant conference in college football. Four SEC schools have won the last seven national championships, and four more that didn't have recently finished in the top ten of the final polls.

That is across-the-board butt kicking.

But, you know that ADs and officials from the B1G and the ACC and the Pac-12 and the Big XII don't want to see two or three teams from the SEC in the playoff, no matter how deserving they may be, so we're going to have a heated debate over favoring conference champions. This is going to create a very real problem for the playoff. Especially at the outset, the one element that the new system needs is credibility, and if we arrive in January of 2015 with anything less than the four best teams duking it out for the championship – the FIRST college football championship of this era – then the sport will be looked at as the loser.

The whole reason for a playoff, even this four-team version, is to eliminate the controversy. And, as we've seen in both basketball and baseball selections in recent years, in those committee rooms – or in limousines on the ride to committee rooms – deals get made. We can't allow that to happen if we want this to be a trusted system, unless they want to scrap the model already and just open it up to eight teams which will allow cover for the league officials to favor some conference champs and still not deny those truly deserving of a shot at the title.

Since we've been told that expanding the field is not on the table – though I promise you it's coming in the next contract – getting correct both the committee and the criteria to be considered is paramount. Whom do we trust to make the right call on the teams?

Conference commissioners and athletic directors? Aren't they busy doing other things, like commissioning and directing athletics?

Current coaches? You know, the coaches' poll has always been an integral part of the BCS formula? (Sticks finger down throat)

What about national media members whose job it is to cover the entirety of the sport? People like national college football writer/commentator Tony Barnhardt, or's Dennis Dodd, or ESPN's Chris Fowler and Kirk Herbstreit, though that would probably eliminate the Mid-American Conference champion.

If we're just choosing four teams, there's no way to remove doubt unless you utilize people without allegiances. Everyone has biases, we all went to school somewhere, but coaches, athletic directors and conference commissioners have at least an indirect financial stake in who gets into the final four, and that element must be removed.

In a recent conversation with Kevin White, Duke's very candid director of athletics, I asked him if he wanted to be on the committee and should conference champions be given strong consideration.

His two answers: "Absolutely not" and "absolutely not.'" He had no interest in devoting that amount of time to that process, and we agreed that the only way this system works is if the four best teams are thrown into the ring to see who climbs out with the belt. If the best four teams all hail from the same conference, then that's who should play. Anything short of that is a hit at the veracity of the system.

And, in year one, even though we're a year away, the most vital piece of the equation is that we truly believe they got it right.


Please with your account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • StunGunn Jun 14, 2013

    View quoted thread

    I'm a fan of one of the "blue" schools, but I agree with you completely. At the very lease the Big Four should play each other every year; for State to play Duke once and then not until 2020 is ridiculous. It's one thing to expand and realign the ACC, but to eliminate local rival games is a terrible decision IMHO.

  • rherring23 Jun 13, 2013

    View quoted thread

    Hum, App St is not a mid-major, they are a division 2 school. But saying that they would not belong, questionable. During their back to back championships and undefeated season they beat Michigan at Michigan, something a lot of those teams you say belong couldn't do. So that means Michigan doesn't belong? During those years App St could have beaten most of the teams you say belong in the championship.

  • VT1994Hokie Jun 13, 2013

    ^^^ You maybe outlined a decent deal. It was difficult to read though.

  • ncaa2014playoff Jun 13, 2013

    ND doesn't play and never has played an FCS Patsy like everybody else but TX. So they belonged in a playoff for the National Championship. So did Alabama even though they lost to A&M. The super sized conferences with the divisions and Conference Championship game are not built to really separate out the best for a playoff. Divide them up. Like the SEC should be 3 football only 10 team conferences fleshed out with 4 mid major teams.
    East: FL, GA, KY, So Car, TN, Vandy, LA T, Mid TN, UL Lafayette, UL Monroe;
    South: AL, Auburn, LSU, MS, MS St., TAMU, Houston, Rice, So MS, Tulane;
    Border: Arkansas, Missouri, ND, Cincinnati, Louisville, Arkansas St., Ball State, Kent St., Memphis, W. KY.;
    Divide ACC, B1G, B12 & PAC into 2 conferences of 10 teams. Then remake the American (old Big East) into BC, Conn, MD, Rutgers, Temple, W VA, Army, Navy, Akron & Marshall.
    The season should be only 11 games, 9 conference & 2 non-conference major teams.
    You now have 12 Conferences of 10 teams (120 total) with the Mid Majors (weaker schools) now in conferences that mean something so they can share the money and recruits because they play in a Power Conference. All 12 Champs go to the 16 Team Playoff along with the 4 second place teams with the most wins. Done all the problems are cured. No more Patsy Games with FCS teams no more expansion with FCS teams, sorry S. Alabama, Mass, GA St., TX St., UTSA, ODU, App St., So GA & Charlotte but you don't belong, wait till some of the weaker schools don't keep up and you can replace them when they are dropped down to FCS. Go check it out at

  • BattlingBishop 5 Jun 13, 2013

    Ready for some football as well.

  • JPack Jun 13, 2013

    View quoted thread

    no ND did not beat them. ND did not play them. Don't know what you were watching but it wasn't football.

  • sburks1906 Jun 13, 2013

    Long live college football! I am looking forward to seeing the new ACC this fall.

  • cjw6105 Jun 13, 2013

    I couldn't care less about how many teams are in a college football playoff that most ACC schools will never be a part of. All I want is for my team (Pack) to play Duke, Georgia Tech, Virginia and Virginia Tech each season or at least every other season, not just once every 10 or 12 years.

    The ACC we are mutating into is one which I don't want to be a part of anymore. I honestly believe that teams like the Wolfpack would be better off being an independent. At least we could schedule teams that our fans wanted to play, and not be controlled by an arrogant bunch whose main interests bleed blue.

  • VT1994Hokie Jun 13, 2013

    A good many well written statements. I'm looking forward to a new football season. Hoping Logan Thomas can have a solid season. Go Hokies.

  • DUKE4EVER Jun 13, 2013

    GO DUKE!!




  • Golf: U.S. Senior Open

    Saturday at 1:00 pm on FOX50

  • US Swimming National Championships

    Saturday at 1:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • Women’s PGA Championship

    Saturday at 3:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • MLB: NY Yankees at Houston

    Saturday at 7:00 pm on FOX50

  • NASCAR: Coke Zero 400 at Daytona

    Saturday at 8:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • Golf: U.S. Senior Open

    Sunday at 1:00 pm on FOX50

  • US Swimming National Championships

    Sunday at 1:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • Women’s PGA Championship

    Sunday at 3:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • MiLB: Bulls at Indianapolis

    Today at 1:35 pm on Buzz Sports Radio

  • College World Series: LSU v. Florida (If necessary

    Tonight at 8:00 on 99.9 The Fan

  • MiLB: MiLB: Bulls at Indianapolis

    Tomorrow at 7:00 pm on Buzz Sports Radio

  • MLB: Washington at St. Louis

    Saturday at 7:00 pm on 99.9 The Fan

Minor League Baseball
International League
Gwinnett 9:05 PT10:05 MT11:05 CT12:05 ET10:05 MT12:05 ET5:05 GMT1:05 北京时间
Durham 10:35 PT11:35 MT12:35 CT1:35 ET11:35 MT1:35 ET6:35 GMT2:35 北京时间
Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 3:35 PT4:35 MT5:35 CT6:35 ET4:35 MT6:35 ET11:35 GMT7:35 北京时间
Pawtucket 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET5:05 MT7:05 ET12:05 GMT8:05 北京时间
Lehigh Valley 
Columbus 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET5:05 MT7:05 ET12:05 GMT8:05 北京时间
Louisville 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET5:05 MT7:05 ET12:05 GMT8:05 北京时间
Rochester 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET5:05 MT7:05 ET12:05 GMT8:05 北京时间
Travelers Champ (PGA)
1J. Spieth - z-12F
2D. Berger - y-12F
3tC. Hoffman-10F
3tD. Lee-10F
5tP. Reed-9F
5tP. Casey-9F
5tB. Weekley-9F
8tK. Streelman-8F
8tT. Merritt-8F
8tW. Simpson-8F
View Full Leaderboard
z = Won in Playoff   y = Lost in Playoff
NW Ark Champ (LPGA)
1S. Ryu-18F
2tA. Yang-16F
2tM. Jutanugarn-16F
4tM. Wie-13F
4tS. Lewis-13F
6tM. Lee-12F
6tI. Park-12F
8tN. Broch Larsen-11F
8tM. Alex-11F
10tM. Harigae-10F
View Full Leaderboard
ATP Scoreboard
Wednesday, Jun. 28
AEGON International (ATP/WTA)
Antalya Open (ATP)
Second Round
(2) P. Lorenzi3 4    
R. Albot6 6    
J. Tipsarevic6 4 4   
A. Seppi3 6 3   
D. Altmaier1     
M. Ilhan0     
(4) D. Ferrer 
Y. Sugita 
WTA Scoreboard
Wednesday, Jun. 28
AEGON International (ATP/WTA)
Second Round
(5) J. Konta 
S. Cirstea 
(8) A. Radwanska 
L. Davis 
(6) C. Wozniacki 
N. Osaka 
(11) G. Muguruza 
B. Strycova 
Third Round
(2) S. Halep 
T. Pironkova 
(14) A. Pavlyuchen 
H. Watson