banner

NFL

more stats

Appellate court gives NFLPA life in collusion suit

St. Louis, MO (SportsNetwork.com) - The NFL Players Association can continue a lawsuit against the NFL, which claimed the league instituted a secret salary cap for the 2010 season.

An appellate court has reversed a decision by a district court that denied the union's claims.

The lawsuit, filed in 2012, stems from the 2010 season when teams were not bound by a salary cap with the conclusion of the collective bargaining agreement on the horizon. The CBA expired at the end of the 2010 campaign and a lockout ensued the following summer.

Once the lockout concluded with a new CBA in August 2011, all litigation was settled, including one of an alleged secret salary cap. However, there were public comments made by some owners, including the New York Giants' John Mara, who said in an interview that the Washington Redskins and Dallas Cowboys had acted "in violation of the spirit of the salary cap" in an attempt "to take advantage of a one-year loophole."

The Redskins and Cowboys were slapped with salary-cap reductions in March 2012 for two seasons after front-loading contracts during the uncapped year.

Two months later, the NFLPA began its collusion lawsuit and a district court in Minnesota initially denied the union's claims.

The union had argued two counts. The first was that the district court had never approved the settlement and the dismissal of all litigation before the new CBA was signed was invalid. The second was that the league had procured the dismissal of the litigation by fraud, misrepresentation of misconduct.

In its ruling announced Friday, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the district court's decision on the first argument and reversed the district court's denial on the second argument.

"Our union will always pursue and protect the rights of its players," the NFLPA said in a statement Friday. "We are pleased that the Eighth Circuit ruled that players have the opportunity to proceed with their claims. Through discovery and a hearing, we can understand how collusion took place. We have notified the NFL of its obligations to preserve all relevant documents and communications."

The appeals court does not necessarily agree with the NFLPA's arguments, stating only that the union should be given a chance to prove its case that the dismissal was fraudulently procured.

The NFL has maintained there was no such collusion.

06/20 13:28:44 ET

Other Stories

TV
  • World Series: Kansas City vs. San Francisco

    Tomorrow at 7:30 pm on FOX50

Scoreboard
Local
Final
GBP 38
CAR 17
Final
CHI 101
CHA 96
7:30pm Tonight
ATL
CHA
 
Final
BRK 90
BOS 95
Final
OKC 94
MIN 112
Final
CHI 101
CHA 96
Final
HOU 90
GSW 83
Final
LAL 98
UTA 91
7:00pm Tonight
CLE
CHI
 
7:00pm Tonight
WAS
NOP
 
7:30pm Tonight
ATL
CHA
 
7:30pm Tonight
NYK
MIL
 
7:30pm Tonight
BRK
PHI
 
8:30pm Tonight
DAL
MEM
 
8:30pm Tonight
SAN
SAC
 
Final
LOS 2
MIN 1
Final
NYR 4
SJS 0
Final
WIN 1
CAL 4
Final
ANA 3
STL 0
9:30pm Tonight
EDM
TAM
 
Final
BAL 29
ATL 7
Final
GBP 38
CAR 17
Final
IND 27
CIN 0
Final
JAC 24
CLE 6
Final
CHI 14
MIA 27
Final
BUF 17
MIN 16
Final
DET 24
NOS 23
Final
STL 28
SEA 26
Final
WAS 19
TEN 17
Final
SDC 20
KAN 23
Final
OAK 13
ARI 24
Final
DAL 31
NYG 21
Final
DEN 42
SFX 17
8:30pm Tonight
PIT
HOU