banner
Caulton Tudor

Rule-breaking athletes need to be accountable

Posted November 4, 2013
Updated November 5, 2013

— While NC State fans are no doubt uneasy about news that a former football player Eric Leak continues to be a concern for the school, there seems to be little question that campus leaders are taking measures to maintain institutional control.

A report by WRAL Investigates makes it clear that while the Leak situation will continue to create anxiety on both the rules and image fronts, there’s no evidence that State has been inattentive to the potential lurking damage.

Barred booster shared townhouse, cars with former Pack players Browder: Barred booster shared townhouse, cars with former Pack players

As this story continues to unfold, Wolfpack fans and officials will ask themselves some of the same questions that have been posed at North Carolina, Ohio State, Southern Cal and any other school that has had to deal with agent/player contacts.

That question: How do you stop it?

The answer, unfortunately, is you probably can’t.

Shift Accountability to Athletes?

There are some radical cures being floated, the most popular of which is finding a way to put more of the onus on rules-breaking players.

One possibility in that regard is to completely revamp the scholarship agreement model, which essentially is a year-to-year casual contract between the school and the player (or player’s guardian in some cases).

If the scholarship agreement included a clause that made a player financially responsible for monetary and/or image damage that he or she knowingly brought upon the school, there’s little doubt that the extent of such rules violations would be decreased many times over.

But is it possible to incorporate such a clause into scholarship contracts? There’s much disagreement in the legal community. For one thing, the athlete would need to hire a lawyer before signing. Otherwise, such a contract almost certainly would be spiked by judges.

That said, the vast majority of the players who break the rules with agents understand what they’re doing when they’re doing it. In some cases, the athlete even initiates contact.

If UNC’s Marvin Austin or Southern Cal’s Reggie Bush knew they could have been sued for damages by their schools when they deliberately accepted illegal goods and money, there’s good reason to think they would have abided by the rules.

A more feasible solution might be to allow any college athlete to turn pro at any time regardless of the situation.

Here’s an example: After a great performance, let’s say an agent offered the athlete a $1 million signing bonus on the spot if he would quit the team immediately to avoid any injury risk during the remainder of the season.

Fans would be outraged, of course, but having the option to cash in on his accomplishments immediately might eliminate temptation for the athlete to break rules that would endanger the reputation of the rest of his team and the school.

Agents give college basketball and football players money and gifts for only one reason  - to land future clients. But that business model doesn’t work well in most other sports. In tennis, golf, baseball, soccer, etc., the athlete can go pro straight out of high school. College golfers and tennis players can turn pro when they chose, even in the middle of a college season.

A third route is the one the state of North Carolina is pursuing by aggressively going after rules-breaking agents and agent intermediaries. If the legal consequences are severe enough, there’s reason to assume at least some agents will abide by the statues.

But under-the-table payments are almost impossible to stop, whether the donor is an agent or overzealous fan. That practice has been going for decades and no doubt will continue to some extent regardless of state or even federal laws. And paying athletes a salary will not stop illicit money from changing hands.

For now, NCSU seems to be doing its best to protect both its borders and reputation. But ultimately, the first and last lines of defense are the athletes. That aspect of the equation may never change.

26 Comments

This blogpost is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Objective Scientist Nov 8, 1:46 p.m.

    Read this article, made a comment, then failed to look at it for several days. Just "scanned" through all of them... and there are some good comments. I'll add some additional thoughts;

    Whoever "writes the rules' - be it the NCAA or the Conference or the University - the rules should be simply and unequivocally stated - clear and 'to the point' - with no more rules than are absolutely necessary. All - ALL - to whom the rules apply - the Universities if the rule is from the NCAA or Conference, the athletic program administrators and every member of a coaching staff, and the PLAYERS/ATHLETES are all held responsible for KNOWING THE RULES and are accountable when they are broken! ESPECIALLY including the players/athletes. For the players/athletes... there MUST be clear consequences of a rule violation... including LOSS of SCHOLARSHIP, and REPAYMENT of scholarship costs and services/materials/equipment, etc. supplied to the athlete, etc., etc., etc. I could go on and on with examples. Bottom line - those INDIVIDUALS who violate rules should suffer significant consequences.

  • GunnyGoesArrrgh Nov 7, 2:28 p.m.

    Allowing a player to go pro at any point in the season is neither fair nor feasible to a coach... View More

    — Posted by GunnyGoesArrrgh

    Another option in dealing with impermissible benefits is to make them permissible. I would much... View More

    — Posted by Ken D.

    Ken, like you said in another post, if the NCAA closes a loophole, somebody will develop another, and that is probably true as far as academics go as well. Look at what happened at Carolina. I'm OK with easy classes like "Rocks for Jocks", but I don't condone grades being changed, no-show classes, and things like that. There are young people who are very gifted athletically, but not academically. Where would these people go? The NCAA has dictated players be one year removed from HS to play in the NBA and (I think) three years removed from HS to play in the NFL. Other than playing in Europe, college provides the avenue for these kids to satisfy NCAA requirements.

    Tough situation, with no obvious answer. I agree with you: I'd rather see things done over the table instead of under it.

  • BISHOP5 Nov 6, 6:32 p.m.

    Allowing a player to go pro at any point in the season is neither fair nor feasible to a coach... View More

    — Posted by GunnyGoesArrrgh

    Another option in dealing with impermissible benefits is to make them permissible. I would much... View More

    — Posted by Ken D.

    Translation - it's not the athlete's fault for breaking the rules. Now then, anybody here willing to man up & take responsibility for the actions of others?
    Anybody will do. lol

  • Jewelry-EricLeak Nov 5, 9:18 p.m.

    Let's have NC State open their doors wide to investigation as UNC did. There will of course be... View More

    — Posted by QC

    ...exactly WHEN did unc "open their doors?" LMFAO They stone-walled with every fiber... View More

    — Posted by uncsuckz

    LMFAO at a fanbase that worships the NCAA's KING of cheaters, Jim Valvano

  • jmcdow2792 Nov 5, 5:15 p.m.

    Allowing a player to go pro at any point in the season is neither fair nor feasible to a coach... View More

    — Posted by GunnyGoesArrrgh

    Another option in dealing with impermissible benefits is to make them permissible. I would much... View More

    — Posted by Ken D.

    I think you have hit the nail on the head. The rules are way to complicated and way to extensive. For example; if I as a minimal contributor (defined as booster) to State happen to meet a high school player, say working at the local McDonald's, and I casually say to him that he should think about attending State, then I have broken the NCAA rules. A lot of these rules are ridiculous. I don't pretend to know what the rules should be. However, I would think that a small committee of in the know people could come up with a complete rewrite given the guidance that the rules need to be simplified and made less restrictive on many fronts.

  • uncsuckz Nov 5, 4:42 p.m.

    Let's have NC State open their doors wide to investigation as UNC did. There will of course be... View More

    — Posted by QC

    ...exactly WHEN did unc "open their doors?" LMFAO They stone-walled with every fiber in their bank account....and still are.

  • Ken D. Nov 5, 3:32 p.m.

    Allowing a player to go pro at any point in the season is neither fair nor feasible to a coach... View More

    — Posted by GunnyGoesArrrgh

    Another option in dealing with impermissible benefits is to make them permissible. I would much... View More

    — Posted by Ken D.

    Hey that's right up there with making drugs legal to eliminate the drug problem, or giving... View More

    — Posted by jdpridg

    The Olympics had this exact problem. They solved it by letting the athletes receive... View More

    — Posted by uBnice

    And it wouldn't make the agents and runners any less sleazy. It would just allow them to slither out from underneath their rocks and operate in the open.

    My point is that there isn't anything inherently unethical or tawdry about players being rewarded for being good at what they do. The only thing that makes them (the players) "guilty" is that there are unreasonable rules in the first place.

  • uBnice Nov 5, 2:16 p.m.

    Allowing a player to go pro at any point in the season is neither fair nor feasible to a coach... View More

    — Posted by GunnyGoesArrrgh

    Another option in dealing with impermissible benefits is to make them permissible. I would much... View More

    — Posted by Ken D.

    Hey that's right up there with making drugs legal to eliminate the drug problem, or giving... View More

    — Posted by jdpridg

    The Olympics had this exact problem. They solved it by letting the athletes receive compensation. Ending prohibition did not solve the alcohol addiction problem but it sure took the violent culture surrounding illegal alcohol away.

  • jdpridg Nov 5, 1:27 p.m.

    Allowing a player to go pro at any point in the season is neither fair nor feasible to a coach... View More

    — Posted by GunnyGoesArrrgh

    Another option in dealing with impermissible benefits is to make them permissible. I would much... View More

    — Posted by Ken D.

    Hey that's right up there with making drugs legal to eliminate the drug problem, or giving amnesty to illegals who sneak into our country so they are no longer law breakers. That's the best idea I've heard yet. While we are at it, let's make sure we create as many rules as possible to penalize the players who follow the rules. Then we can change the name from NCAA to department of collegiate sports oversight. The government doesn't have control of that yet.

  • Ken D. Nov 5, 11:31 a.m.

    Allowing a player to go pro at any point in the season is neither fair nor feasible to a coach... View More

    — Posted by GunnyGoesArrrgh

    Another option in dealing with impermissible benefits is to make them permissible. I would much rather have NCAA enforcement efforts directed to making sure athletes are legitimate students making satisfactory progress toward a degree.

    I don't care all that much if the star athlete is getting rewarded for his performance. So are star lawyers, and musicians, and doctors, etc.

    As fast as the NCAA finds a way to close one loophole, somebody will develop another. This is a war the NCAA can't win.

More...

 

 

Scoreboard
Local
Final
CREI 65
NCCU 45
 
Final
NCSU 68
SFLA 65
Final
MIA 94
CHA 93
 
Final
MIA 94
CHA 93
 
Final
MEM 107
LAC 91
 
Final
BOS 88
POR 94
 
3rd
OKC 53
GSW 56
 
9:30pm Tonight
LAL
DEN
Final
GMAS 60
COC 61
Final
FSU 69
UMASS 75
Final
SHSU 53
WOFF 64
Final
UNCG 67
YOUNG 76
Final
CMICH 75
ARKPB 43
 
Final
ILLCH 60
SILL 67
Final
MORE 46
AMER 51
Final
CORN 59
DREX 61
Final
CCST 60
COOK 65
Final
ARKLR 94
CSNO 88
Final
LEH 44
CLMB 54
 
Final
USB 89
MERMAR 54
 
Final
NMU 51
TEXAM 64
Final
STLU 56
TAMCC 62
 
Final
FAIR 80
SD 72
Final
EMICH 79
LONG 48
 
Final
ND 74
PROV 75
Final
RAD 88
CATAWBA 52
 
Final
DEN 80
COPST 54
 
Final
UAB 58
JST 50
 
Final
WICHS 105
NWM 57
Final
OKLA 90
NWST 68
Final
KSU 59
YALE 66
Final
CREI 65
NCCU 45
 
Final
NCSU 68
SFLA 65
Final
UCR 102
STKAT 49
 
Final
PSU 63
USC 61
 
Final
HC 101
NICHOLSCOL 70
 
Final
BC 53
DAY 65
Final
MON 75
TOWS 79
Final
HOF 93
WAGN 71
 
Final
CIN 54
EILL 49
Final
UGA 74
FATL 61
Final
BRAD 58
NCAT 50
 
Final
LATU 76
PBY 48
 
Final
RUTG 76
Terriers 73
 
Final
SAMF 64
UMKC 55
 
Final
NAVY 70
BING 68
 
Final
SHU 85
GWEBB 67
 
Final
UNT 58
IONA 78
 
Final
KENT 86
MNTST 28
 
Final
FORD 57
MLOWELL 64
 
Final
UCF 76
USCU 69
 
Final
SCAR 63
AKR 68
 
2nd
WVU 50
UCONN 44
 
2nd
CALST 56
DEL 42
 
2nd
HOW 69
HOOD 33
 
2nd
OSU 90
SHU 41
 
2nd
VANDY 64
TENST 34
 
1st
NE 38
MAN 19
 
1st
COLST 33
MERC 24
 
1st
MISS 25
NARZ 24
 
1st
WASH 23
PAC 20
 
1st
LMU 29
SDCHR 16
 
9:00pm Tonight
CHAR
MIAMI
9:00pm Tonight
ILLST
ODU
9:00pm Tonight
GAELS
UCI
10:00pm Tonight
UCLA
LBSU
10:30pm Tonight
SEAT
MONT
 
Final
WIN 2
STL 4
2nd
NYR 3
MON 0
 
1st
ANA 0
ARI 0
 
9:30pm Tonight
VAN
CHI
Final
HOU 13
CIN 22
Final
ATL 24
CLE 26
Final
NEP 34
DET 9
Final
MIN 21
GBP 24
Final
IND 23
JAC 3
Final
CHI 21
TAM 13
Final
PHI 43
TEN 24
Final
SEA 19
ARI 3
Final
SDC 27
STL 24
Final
DEN 39
MIA 36
Final
SFX 17
WAS 13
1st
NYG 0
DAL 0