RE: The truth is unc could not live up to expectations
^
Unmatched in NCAA history...losing to lower seeds in the Big Dance.
Pretty cool.
- Posted by kato_karma.01
unmatched in ncaa history.
winning a title then failing to make the tourney the following year.
By "unmatched" you mean other than the 6 times it happened to someone else?
did i say that? nope. you should read a post first before you make a dumb reply.
you said yesterday that duke losing to lehigh was the "most embarrassing loss in NCAA tournament history" therefore, making it "unmatched." when in reality, this feat had been done before, on numerous occassions.
just applying those same principles you used yesterday to describe UNCs shortcomings in 2010.
So, just to clarify ... you're claiming you weren't trying to say that Carolina's winning the title one year and failing to make the tourney the next was unmatched in ncaa history?
I've said repeatedly that dook's embarrassing performance was tied with others and that tied for #1 is still #1.
RE: The truth is unc could not live up to expectations
unmatched in ncaa history.
winning a title then failing to make the tourney the following year.
- Posted by jrj6950
By "unmatched" you mean other than the 6 times it happened to someone else?
did i say that? nope. you should read a post first before you make a dumb reply.
you said yesterday that duke losing to lehigh was the "most embarrassing loss in NCAA tournament history" therefore, making it "unmatched." when in reality, this feat had been done before, on numerous occassions.
just applying those same principles you used yesterday to describe UNCs shortcomings in 2010.
So, just to clarify ... you're claiming you weren't trying to say that Carolina's winning the title one year and failing to make the tourney the next was unmatched in ncaa history?
I've said repeatedly that dook's embarrassing performance was tied with others and that tied for #1 is still #1.
Just applying the same principles outlined by you yesterday to describe UNCs embarrassing outcome in 2010.
RE: The truth is unc could not live up to expectations
By "unmatched" you mean other than the 6 times it happened to someone else?
- Posted by heelman73
did i say that? nope. you should read a post first before you make a dumb reply.
you said yesterday that duke losing to lehigh was the "most embarrassing loss in NCAA tournament history" therefore, making it "unmatched." when in reality, this feat had been done before, on numerous occassions.
just applying those same principles you used yesterday to describe UNCs shortcomings in 2010.
So, just to clarify ... you're claiming you weren't trying to say that Carolina's winning the title one year and failing to make the tourney the next was unmatched in ncaa history?
I've said repeatedly that dook's embarrassing performance was tied with others and that tied for #1 is still #1.
Just applying the same principles outlined by you yesterday to describe UNCs embarrassing outcome in 2010.
You'd better try again. You're looking more and more stupid by the post.
RE: The truth is unc could not live up to expectations
unmatched in ncaa history.
winning a title then failing to make the tourney the following year.
- Posted by jrj6950
By "unmatched" you mean other than the 6 times it happened to someone else?
Facts? We don't need no stinking facts.
I remember all those posts back in 2006 about the World Championship game....
LOL
where did I claim anything stated was factual?
Well, let's look at the definition of the word you used...
unmatched-Without equal or rival;
As as earlier been shown, it was not "without" equal.
See, some terms, like "unmatched" are objective, or based on facts.
Some, like "embarrassing", are subjective, which can be colored by bias.
RE: The truth is unc could not live up to expectations
where did I claim anything stated was factual?
- Posted by jrj6950
^This needs no retort. SMH.
RE: The truth is unc could not live up to expectations
jr is either too stupid to realize that "most embarrassing" means no other embarrassment exceeds it, while "unmatched" means never equaled, or he's too embarrassed to admit that he just picked up on an prior erroneous statement by BDF and got burned by it.
RE: The truth is unc could not live up to expectations
did i say that? nope. you should read a post first before you make a dumb reply.
you said yesterday that duke losing to lehigh was the "most embarrassing loss in NCAA tournament history" therefore, making it "unmatched." when in reality, this feat had been done before, on numerous occassions.
just applying those same principles you used yesterday to describe UNCs shortcomings in 2010.
- Posted by jrj6950
So, just to clarify ... you're claiming you weren't trying to say that Carolina's winning the title one year and failing to make the tourney the next was unmatched in ncaa history?
I've said repeatedly that dook's embarrassing performance was tied with others and that tied for #1 is still #1.
Just applying the same principles outlined by you yesterday to describe UNCs embarrassing outcome in 2010.
You'd better try again. You're looking more and more stupid by the post.
So you are denying that you called Duke's loss to LeHigh the "most embarrassing moment in NCAAT history?"
Because those were your exact words.
RE: The truth is unc could not live up to expectations
jr is either too stupid to realize that "most embarrassing" means no other embarrassment exceeds it, while "unmatched" means never equaled, or he's too embarrassed to admit that he just picked up on an prior erroneous statement by BDF and got burned by it.
- Posted by heelman73
Right, it means never equaled, meaning nothing can exceed it. Thanks for proving my point!
RE: The truth is unc could not live up to expectations
So, just to clarify ... you're claiming you weren't trying to say that Carolina's winning the title one year and failing to make the tourney the next was unmatched in ncaa history?
I've said repeatedly that dook's embarrassing performance was tied with others and that tied for #1 is still #1.
- Posted by heelman73
Just applying the same principles outlined by you yesterday to describe UNCs embarrassing outcome in 2010.
You'd better try again. You're looking more and more stupid by the post.
So you are denying that you called Duke's loss to LeHigh the "most embarrassing moment in NCAAT history?"
Because those were your exact words.
Yep, I never said moment - I said most embarrassing loss. I'll never deny saying that because it's true, and I'll never stop laughing about it unless someone surpasses that dubious achievement).
Rank: Sports Legend 
Rank: 
Rank: 
