Cheating went back to 1999. When the first bunch of folks looked into the problem they saw how deep it was and ran. giving cup cake U a slap on the wrist. Something tells me they are coming back..........good by banners- Posted by wallaceedwards67
Cheating Lying and anything dishonest is the UNC wayPosting without facts is the ABC way! LMAO at the OP!- Posted by Tar Heels Victory-GO HEELS
Posting without facts is the ABC way! LMAO at the OP!- Posted by Tar Heels Victory-GO HEELS
- Posted by DooksucksV3Posting without facts is the ABC way! LMAO at the OP!- Posted by Tar Heels Victory-GO HEELS
Hal has never been known for his sanity.
- Posted by unc70Cheating went back to 1999. When the first bunch of folks looked into the problem they saw how deep it was and ran. giving cup cake U a slap on the wrist. Something tells me they are coming back..........good by banners- Posted by wallaceedwards67
You might want to re-read Kane's article. That isn't what was said. I admit you have to be extremely careful when reading anything written by Kane. He strings ideas, opinions, and supposed facts together trying to support his hypothesis. But he really needs an editor (sort of like a tutor, but something real newspapers used to have). He doesn't properly identify his sources, and tends to attribute his ideas as facts, while often mixing up the sources for his various "facts". Citing your own opinion in an earlier article still does not qualify it as a fact.
Tell it too the judge,or warden you pic the one.- Posted by WolfPackInTheHizzouse- Posted by unc70Cheating went back to 1999. When the first bunch of folks looked into the problem they saw how deep it was and ran. giving cup cake U a slap on the wrist. Something tells me they are coming back..........good by banners- Posted by wallaceedwards67
You might want to re-read Kane's article. That isn't what was said. I admit you have to be extremely careful when reading anything written by Kane. He strings ideas, opinions, and supposed facts together trying to support his hypothesis. But he really needs an editor (sort of like a tutor, but something real newspapers used to have). He doesn't properly identify his sources, and tends to attribute his ideas as facts, while often mixing up the sources for his various "facts". Citing your own opinion in an earlier article still does not qualify it as a fact.
Lol that was a LOT of typing to NOT cite any flaws in the article....
Dance much???
maybe but he's interviewing UNCs current staff members that admitted most of the details. " No comment " has become the only answer given from from Carolina when new stuff pops up.- Posted by unc70Cheating went back to 1999. When the first bunch of folks looked into the problem they saw how deep it was and ran. giving cup cake U a slap on the wrist. Something tells me they are coming back..........good by banners- Posted by wallaceedwards67
You might want to re-read Kane's article. That isn't what was said. I admit you have to be extremely careful when reading anything written by Kane. He strings ideas, opinions, and supposed facts together trying to support his hypothesis. But he really needs an editor (sort of like a tutor, but something real newspapers used to have). He doesn't properly identify his sources, and tends to attribute his ideas as facts, while often mixing up the sources for his various "facts". Citing your own opinion in an earlier article still does not qualify it as a fact.
" No comment " has become the only answer given from from Carolina when new stuff pops up.
Please log in to add post.