RE: Roy Williams Accused of being a
- Posted by The1The 2010 team UNC was comprised of some talented players but they never came together as a team. As such, they were beaten by a better team as represented in the RPI rankings. dook, on the other hand, was highly rated the entire year. As a result they were a #2 seed in the NCAA tournament and lost to a team that was ranked 80 slots below them. So, in that respect we agree.- Posted by rx74u2nv- Posted by The1Here is the difference as I see it. In 2010 UNC, with an RPI rank of 56, lost in the NIT to Dayton, with an RPI rank of 34. In 2011 dook, with an RPI rank of 7, lost to Lehigh, with an RPI rank of 87.- Posted by rx74u2nv
UNC had plenty of burger boys in 2010 and still went to the NIT. You see the difference?
So UNC was bad all year and Duke was bad the last few games. I'm glad we agree again. The1 can see what difference a coach can make. One reloads and blows all year, the other reloads, struggles, but still puts together a decent season.
"One game makes your whole season"
We agree that UNC was consistantly bad and lost to a team with less talent in the NIT and Duke played up and down and lost a bad game in the first round of the NCAA? Of course UNC had a low RPI! They were 20-17 playing in the NIT! The derping you do is amazing. You needed the RPI rating to tell you UNC was weak, even with all of that talent, and you need the RPI to tell you that, even though it was a reload year, Duke still had a decent year?
Never coming together is a coaching issue. I doubt that anyone would say that Dayton had a better group of players...
Here is your Juggernaut!!