banner

How long will it take for WRAL and others to report the UNC responses?

Return to Forum
Oldest First
  • Objective Scientist Apr 13, 10:12 a.m.
    Sports Legend

    The problem here is that even if the outside "experts" reported the "truth" as they saw it, and that they are indeed the best qualified to address the issue, it still "looks bad", their findings are "tainted", and "questionable" because they were chosen, hired, and paid by UNC! A piece of information that would be interesting... what were those "experts" charged with doing? I'd love to see the emails/letters, etc. exchanged between UNC and the "experts". UNC: "I'm hiring you, I will pay you a "nice sum of money" to do something for me." Experts: "OK - that sounds good... what is it you want me to do?" What was UNC's answer to that question?

  • PackFanaticInTheHouse Apr 13, 9:14 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among... View More

    — Posted by unc70

    So then tell us how do "outside experts" at trials come up with different conclusions for the... View More

    — Posted by KT called a Congressional hearin

    Please don't let logical thoughts enter your head before responding to that mentally "questionable" individual.

    In fact.. MOST pansies have a rather difficult time processing it (logic).

    #SoKeepThatInMind

    :)

  • KT called a Congressional hearin Apr 13, 9:09 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    That's how they earned their biscuits.
    Eggzactly the conclusion the PR firm instructed them to... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among... View More

    — Posted by unc70

    So then tell us how do "outside experts" at trials come up with different conclusions for the prosecution and defense? Seems to happen quite often. I wonder....

  • KT called a Congressional hearin Apr 13, 9:07 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    When UNCheat invites the NCAA a back and not another independent researcher and the NCAA and... View More

    — Posted by heelraiser3

    The independent studies don't say that nothing was done incorrectly. They say that Mary is a... View More

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Kind of like the stuff coming out after Gov Martin's "review?"

  • heelraiser3 Apr 12, 11:10 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    Holding 3 degrees from UNC - ALL were earned and not one "paper-only" class on my transcript - I... View More

    — Posted by Objective Scientist

    Nice post. Finally a UNC fan with some objectivity.

  • Objective Scientist Apr 12, 9:49 a.m.
    Sports Legend

    Holding 3 degrees from UNC - ALL were earned and not one "paper-only" class on my transcript - I would indeed like for someone credible to find that it was all a "mistake"... that UNC never, ever admitted an athlete, or even a "regular student", who could not even read at the high school level. Was this group of 3 "credible"? From what I've seen they have the "credentials" and "qualifications" to be able to evaluate the information and make a judgment. However, their findings are "tainted" by having been hired by UNC. In a case like this, with the "experts" finding in favor of the University that hired them, such findings always has been and always will be "suspect". My background enables me to make an evaluation of Willingham's assertions, although I do not have the data and other information the hired experts had, therefore limiting my scrutiny. That said... the "test" to measure reading ability that is a huge factor in this entire discussion is not a "perfect" test of reading ability... it is clearly not the best test for reading ability... but it does tell us something about the individual's tested... along with LOTS of other information we have about athletes who were admitted to UNC. Let's set aside the focus on reading ability, and ask a very simple question - were/are athletes admitted to UNC who should not have been admitted due to significant/severe deficiencies in academic ability... the ability to do college level academic work at a university such as UNC? There is certainly ample evidence that point to a resounding "YES" as the answer! Also... some seem to have interpreting all of this to mean that ALL UNC athletes are deficient in reading and academic ability. That is NOT the case! Most UNC athletes are quite capable in the classroom... it is only a relative few who are lacking. But... those few are a few too many and they should never have been admitted. McAdoo (the football McAdoo) is a prime example!

  • heelraiser3 Apr 12, 9:00 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    That's how they earned their biscuits.
    Eggzactly the conclusion the PR firm instructed them to... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among... View More

    — Posted by unc70

    Simply put. YES.

  • modukev5saysbyebye Apr 12, 8:36 a.m.
    Bench Warmer

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among... View More

    2 words for you - Gov. Martin

  • PackFanaticInTheHouse Apr 12, 7:46 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    The independent studies don't say that nothing was done incorrectly. They say that Mary is a... View More

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    That's how they earned their biscuits.
    Eggzactly the conclusion the PR firm instructed them to... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    B-I-N-G-O

    they would GLADLY perform the services REQUESTED and come out with the CORRECT answer, in order to secure their proceeds, as well as to PROVE to other such institutions.... hey, if you need an "outside independent study" done.... we've GOT YOUR BACK... wink;)wink;)

    what it is....

    is FURTHER embarrassment for a pansy filled institution in DIRE NEED of NO FURTHER EMBARRASSMENT.

    isn't being a NATIONAL LAUGHINGSTOCK for FIVE LONG YEARS enough?!?!?!?!?!?!

    #GiveThePansiesABreak.....
    #TheyClearlyWillNeverReadilyADMITToTheirMisgivingsAsTheirBig
    BrotherToTheEastDidSome24YearsAgo
    #RealityIsAGrandPlace....IfOnlyPansiesWeren'tSoScaredTo
    DeathOfIt

    :)

  • unc70 Apr 12, 2:59 a.m.
    Sports Legend

    The independent studies don't say that nothing was done incorrectly. They say that Mary is a... View More

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    That's how they earned their biscuits.
    Eggzactly the conclusion the PR firm instructed them to... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among their peers by doing anything less than their best unbiased work because of who was paying them? Would you? For a mere $5,000? Really? Their work faces the ultimate peer review, with three separate analyses of the same data under scrutiny in a highly visible environment.

    Have you no experience in the academic and research worlds? Do you believe it about the money for everyone, or just when it favors UNC? Do you general trust people and expect the best from them; or are you more among those my father meant when he cautioned to "Trust not those who trust not", or at least "Be slow to trust…"

Oldest First

Please to post.

TV
  • The Logan Zone

    Tomorrow at 11:30 am on WRAL-TV

Scoreboard
Local
Final
NCCU 21
NCA 14
 
Final
DAVID 72
UNC 90
Final
ECU 34
TULA 6
 
3rd
COL 2
CAR 3
 
2nd
DUKE 51
STAN 41
 
Final
ORL 92
MIA 99
 
Final
IND 83
PHO 106
 
Final
NYK 91
PHI 83
Final
CLE 93
TOR 110
 
Final
HOU 95
DAL 92
 
Final
MIN 101
SAC 113
 
Final
SAN 99
BRK 87
 
Final
MIL 100
WAS 111
 
4th
UTA 76
NOP 90
 
Final
UGA 55
CHSO 9
Final
UF 52
EKU 3
Final
OSU 42
IND 27
Final
OKLA 44
KU 7
 
Final
UAB 18
MARS 23
Final
NEB 24
MINN 28
 
Final
PURD 14
NW 38
 
Final
ILL 16
PSU 14
Final
MSU 45
RUTG 3
Final
UCF 53
SMU 7
 
Final
SCAR 37
SALABAMA 12
Final
WKENT 45
TXSANANTO 7
 
Final
WAKE 6
VT 3
 
Final
ODU 30
LATU 27
Final
ARST 52
WASU 31
 
Final
CMICH 20
WMICH 32
 
Final
COLST 58
NMU 20
Final
LALAF 16
APPST 35
Final
BST 45
EMICH 30
Final
HOU 38
TULSA 28
Final
UTAH 10
ARZ 42
 
Final
FSU 20
BC 17
Final
UNT 17
FIU 14
 
Final
CLEM 28
GASTATE 0
 
Final
ND 28
LOU 31
 
Final
MICH 16
MD 23
 
Final
ARK 30
MISS 0
 
Final
PITT 30
SYR 7
 
Final
ISU 31
TTU 34
 
Final
ECU 34
TULA 6
 
Final
IOWA 24
WISC 26
 
Final
MEM 31
SFLA 20
 
Final
CAL 17
STAN 38
 
Final
NMST 17
LAMON 30
 
Final
ALA 48
WCAR 14
 
Final
OREG 44
COL 10
Final
MTST 35
FATL 34
 
Final
UVA 30
MIAMI 13
 
Final
AUB 31
SAMF 7
4th
TENN 21
MIZZ 29
 
Final
BAY 49
OKST 28
 
Final
MSST 51
VANDY 0
 
4th
UCONN 0
CIN 41
 
4th
UCLA 38
USC 14
 
1st
WYO 0
BSU 7
 
1st
NEV 0
FRES 0
 
1st
WASH 7
ORST 0
 
11:00pm Tonight
HAW
UNLV
Final
PRIN 68
INCWORD 79
 
Final
UMASS 68
ND 81
Final
GEOR 80
RMU 66
 
Final
LAS 59
PETE 50
Final
VT 63
APP 65
 
Final
IUPUI 71
BST 69
 
Final
WMICH 91
DRAK 75
 
Final
RICH 80
HIGH 56
 
Final
MSST 71
UTST 63
Final
CAMP 48
COL 54
 
Final
DAVID 72
UNC 90
Final
NIOWA 66
UNF 49
 
Final
CSNO 79
SAMF 72
 
Final
YALE 61
MLOWELL 63
 
Final
NEV 50
CLEM 59
Final
PROV 80
FSU 54
 
Final
MARQ 89
NEOM 97
Final
DET 66
SALA 53
 
Final
TXSA 80
TXST 67
 
Final
CHIST 75
TRINCHRIS 52
 
Final
UMO 63
LIB 52
 
Final
BONA 59
CAN 53
 
Final
SAV 87
CLST 83
 
Final
NW 68
ELON 67
 
Final
RFLSH 57
MDES 53
 
Final
CARK 68
SEMIZ 74
 
Final
AFA 90
WSCO 60
 
Final
YOUNG 82
LONG 72
 
Final
MTST 66
SOUTH 48
 
Final
ARKLR 73
UMKC 68
 
Final
ABCHRIST 81
DUQ 102
 
Final
WEBER 58
LSU 72
 
Final
BUT 80
GHND 39
 
Final
CSFU 70
SJST 66
 
Final
WOFF 72
SD 68
Final
NORST 76
TXSOU 66
 
Final
COOK 42
TOWS 63
 
Final
SILL 46
YALE 53
 
Final
KNST 83
ALCOR 80
 
Final
MAN 78
BING 63
 
Final
JVST 88
MILES 71
 
Final
CSOU 79
WRST 86
 
Final
CITA 81
BOBJONES 50
 
Final
INDST 78
BRO 66
 
Final
WYO 56
COL 33
 
Final
GSOUT 97
FCCOL 41
 
Final
CCAR 76
PIEDINT 33
 
Final
LATU 63
AMER 44
 
Final
MAR 62
ARMY 76
 
Final
TENT 69
CHAT 67
 
Final
EKENT 115
CLERMONT 50
 
Final
SMU 77
EWASH 68
Final
NIAG 62
HART 65
 
Final
PENN 77
LAF 83
 
Final
UCSB 91
MASTERS 45
 
Final
BUCK 69
MNTER 73
 
Final
VMI 93
UNCW 110
 
Final
RIU 66
NEB 62
 
Final
NKENTUCKY 98
OHMWSTRN 48
 
Final
GTDNS 73
QUIN 76
 
Final
EMICH 70
UNCG 62
 
Final
ETST 98
UNCA 87
 
Final
TEMPL 50
UNLV 57
 
Final
STJOE 68
VERM 60
 
Final
MON 65
CCST 50
 
Final
KSU 78
ILLCH 60
 
Final
FAIR 60
SHSU 74
 
Final
LIP 74
TRANSYLVAN 63
 
Final
FUR 55
UCD 58
 
Final
WKENT 63
BEL 64
 
Final
NDST 74
HAMP 66
 
Final
IND 85
LAM 72
 
Final
TTU 80
MIZST 68
 
Final
HOU 72
MRGST 57
 
Final
NAVY 44
NE 68
 
Final
ALAAM 81
OAKW 61
 
Final
WILL 60
SELA 57
 
Final
TULA 89
SONO 45
 
Final
TXPA 82
A 77
 
Final
RICE 65
WMARY 69
 
Final
TXARL 87
HOUB 69
 
Final
MINN 69
UMBC 51
 
2nd
UTEP 68
NMST 65
 
Final
GONZ 109
STTHOM 55
 
Final
SUTAH 75
WLVRN 85
 
2nd
PBY 39
MORE 61
 
2nd
DUKE 51
STAN 41
 
Half
WISC 38
BSU 24
 
Half
PORT 46
SIUE 28
 
Final
OTT 2
STL 3
Final
WAS 1
BUF 2
 
Final
PHI 4
CLB 2
 
Final
TOR 4
DET 1
 
Final
TAM 2
MIN 1
 
Final
BOS 0
MON 2
 
Final
NYI 4
PIT 1
 
Final
NAS 3
FLA 2
 
Final
DAL 5
LOS 4
 
3rd
COL 2
CAR 3
 
1st Intermission
EDM 0
CHI 3
 
1st Intermission
CAL 0
NJD 2
 
1st
SJS 0
ARI 2
 
Final
NCCU 21
NCA 14