banner

How long will it take for WRAL and others to report the UNC responses?

Return to Forum
Oldest First
  • Objective Scientist Apr 13, 10:12 a.m.
    Sports Legend

    The problem here is that even if the outside "experts" reported the "truth" as they saw it, and that they are indeed the best qualified to address the issue, it still "looks bad", their findings are "tainted", and "questionable" because they were chosen, hired, and paid by UNC! A piece of information that would be interesting... what were those "experts" charged with doing? I'd love to see the emails/letters, etc. exchanged between UNC and the "experts". UNC: "I'm hiring you, I will pay you a "nice sum of money" to do something for me." Experts: "OK - that sounds good... what is it you want me to do?" What was UNC's answer to that question?

  • PackFanaticInTheHouse Apr 13, 9:14 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among... View More

    — Posted by unc70

    So then tell us how do "outside experts" at trials come up with different conclusions for the... View More

    — Posted by KT called a Congressional hearin

    Please don't let logical thoughts enter your head before responding to that mentally "questionable" individual.

    In fact.. MOST pansies have a rather difficult time processing it (logic).

    #SoKeepThatInMind

    :)

  • KT called a Congressional hearin Apr 13, 9:09 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    That's how they earned their biscuits.
    Eggzactly the conclusion the PR firm instructed them to... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among... View More

    — Posted by unc70

    So then tell us how do "outside experts" at trials come up with different conclusions for the prosecution and defense? Seems to happen quite often. I wonder....

  • KT called a Congressional hearin Apr 13, 9:07 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    When UNCheat invites the NCAA a back and not another independent researcher and the NCAA and... View More

    — Posted by heelraiser3

    The independent studies don't say that nothing was done incorrectly. They say that Mary is a... View More

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Kind of like the stuff coming out after Gov Martin's "review?"

  • heelraiser3 Apr 12, 11:10 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    Holding 3 degrees from UNC - ALL were earned and not one "paper-only" class on my transcript - I... View More

    — Posted by Objective Scientist

    Nice post. Finally a UNC fan with some objectivity.

  • Objective Scientist Apr 12, 9:49 a.m.
    Sports Legend

    Holding 3 degrees from UNC - ALL were earned and not one "paper-only" class on my transcript - I would indeed like for someone credible to find that it was all a "mistake"... that UNC never, ever admitted an athlete, or even a "regular student", who could not even read at the high school level. Was this group of 3 "credible"? From what I've seen they have the "credentials" and "qualifications" to be able to evaluate the information and make a judgment. However, their findings are "tainted" by having been hired by UNC. In a case like this, with the "experts" finding in favor of the University that hired them, such findings always has been and always will be "suspect". My background enables me to make an evaluation of Willingham's assertions, although I do not have the data and other information the hired experts had, therefore limiting my scrutiny. That said... the "test" to measure reading ability that is a huge factor in this entire discussion is not a "perfect" test of reading ability... it is clearly not the best test for reading ability... but it does tell us something about the individual's tested... along with LOTS of other information we have about athletes who were admitted to UNC. Let's set aside the focus on reading ability, and ask a very simple question - were/are athletes admitted to UNC who should not have been admitted due to significant/severe deficiencies in academic ability... the ability to do college level academic work at a university such as UNC? There is certainly ample evidence that point to a resounding "YES" as the answer! Also... some seem to have interpreting all of this to mean that ALL UNC athletes are deficient in reading and academic ability. That is NOT the case! Most UNC athletes are quite capable in the classroom... it is only a relative few who are lacking. But... those few are a few too many and they should never have been admitted. McAdoo (the football McAdoo) is a prime example!

  • heelraiser3 Apr 12, 9:00 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    That's how they earned their biscuits.
    Eggzactly the conclusion the PR firm instructed them to... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among... View More

    — Posted by unc70

    Simply put. YES.

  • modukev5saysbyebye Apr 12, 8:36 a.m.
    Bench Warmer

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among... View More

    2 words for you - Gov. Martin

  • PackFanaticInTheHouse Apr 12, 7:46 a.m.
    Towel Boy

    The independent studies don't say that nothing was done incorrectly. They say that Mary is a... View More

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    That's how they earned their biscuits.
    Eggzactly the conclusion the PR firm instructed them to... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    B-I-N-G-O

    they would GLADLY perform the services REQUESTED and come out with the CORRECT answer, in order to secure their proceeds, as well as to PROVE to other such institutions.... hey, if you need an "outside independent study" done.... we've GOT YOUR BACK... wink;)wink;)

    what it is....

    is FURTHER embarrassment for a pansy filled institution in DIRE NEED of NO FURTHER EMBARRASSMENT.

    isn't being a NATIONAL LAUGHINGSTOCK for FIVE LONG YEARS enough?!?!?!?!?!?!

    #GiveThePansiesABreak.....
    #TheyClearlyWillNeverReadilyADMITToTheirMisgivingsAsTheirBig
    BrotherToTheEastDidSome24YearsAgo
    #RealityIsAGrandPlace....IfOnlyPansiesWeren'tSoScaredTo
    DeathOfIt

    :)

  • unc70 Apr 12, 2:59 a.m.
    Sports Legend

    The independent studies don't say that nothing was done incorrectly. They say that Mary is a... View More

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    That's how they earned their biscuits.
    Eggzactly the conclusion the PR firm instructed them to... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Eggzactly the response expected from ABC lemmings.

    — Posted by tarheeltruth

    Do you honestly believe there is one scintilla of a chance that a group of "outside experts"... View More

    — Posted by modukev5saysbyebye

    Do you honestly believe these experts would put at risk their reputations and standing among their peers by doing anything less than their best unbiased work because of who was paying them? Would you? For a mere $5,000? Really? Their work faces the ultimate peer review, with three separate analyses of the same data under scrutiny in a highly visible environment.

    Have you no experience in the academic and research worlds? Do you believe it about the money for everyone, or just when it favors UNC? Do you general trust people and expect the best from them; or are you more among those my father meant when he cautioned to "Trust not those who trust not", or at least "Be slow to trust…"

Oldest First

Please to post.

  • ACC: North Carolina vs. Miami

    Tomorrow at 12:25 pm on WRAL-TV

  • NFL: San Diego vs. Miami

    Tomorrow at 1:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • SEC: Florida vs. Georgia

    Tomorrow at 3:30 pm on WRAL-TV

  • CFB: Notre Dame vs. Navy

    Tomorrow at 8:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • ACC: Duke at Pittsburgh

    Tomorrow at 12:00 pm on 620am

  • ACC: NC State at Syracuse

    Tomorrow at 3:00 pm on WRAL-FM

  • NHL: Carolina Hurricanes vs Arizona Coyotes

    Tomorrow at 7:00 pm on 99.9 The Fan

  • Football Friday with Tom Suiter

    Tonight at 11:35

Scoreboard
Local
Final
CAR 10
NOS 28
Final
ORL 98
WAS 105
Final
MIN 97
DET 91
Final
CLE 90
NYK 95
Final
DAL 120
UTA 102
Final
LAC 93
OKC 90
7:00pm Tonight
IND
MEM
 
8:00pm Tonight
CHI
CLE
 
8:30pm Tonight
MIL
PHI
 
10:00pm Tonight
SAC
POR
 
10:00pm Tonight
PHO
SAN
 
10:30pm Tonight
LAL
LAC
 
Final
LOU 31
FSU 42
Final
GASO 42
TROY 10
8:00pm Tonight
TULA
CIN
8:02pm Tonight
MEM
TULSA
Final
BUF 2
BOS 3
Final
PIT 3
LOS 0
Final
NJD 2
WIN 1
Final
FLA 2
ARI 1
Final
OTT 4
CHI 5
Final
TAM 4
PHI 3
Final
STL 2
ANA 0
Final
MIN 4
SJS 3
Final
COL 5
NYI 0
Final
VAN 3
MON 2
7:00pm Tonight
CLB
TOR
 
7:30pm Tonight
DET
LOS
 
8:30pm Tonight
DAL
ANA
 
9:00pm Tonight
CAL
NAS
 
Final
CAR 10
NOS 28