Leave the NCAA Tournament alone
Posted December 10, 2009
There is talk that the NCAA could expand its men’s basketball tournament from the current 65-team pool.
I, for one, am hoping those talks go nowhere.
With the NCAA holding the option to back out of the final three years of its deal with CBS after the conclusion of this season, conversations are already being had about possible changes to the most exciting tournament in all of sports.
The last big expansion of college basketball’s season-ending playoff was in 1985, when the field grew from 48 to 64 teams.
Since that time, a 65th team, and one play-in game have also been tacked on.
But what would be the point of making the tournament even larger than it already is?
What else is new?
For once, I hope that the governing body of college sports acts in a manner that benefits the product, and not just the wallet.
More teams would mean more rounds, and more rounds would likely mean an earlier start.
If that were the case, what would happen to the major conference tournaments?
Would they be canceled altogether?
It used to be that the conference tournaments were given the respect they deserved. There was no opportunity to play for a national championship without a conference tournament title – and it’s still that way in the smaller conferences.
I'm not saying we should go back to allowing only one team from each conference into the tournament, but in the ACC, Big East, Big 12, etc…, some coaches have begun treating their conference tournaments like mere warm-ups for the Big Dance. Adding more games on to the end of the season would only motivate coaches to monitor the playing time of their greatest players even more.
I wouldn’t consider myself an ardent traditionalist, but I also don’t like the idea of diminishing the importance of conference tournaments even more than it already is.
Also, it’s not like you would be expanding the field to include the upper echelon teams – they’re already in.
What you are adding, in essence, are teams that quite frankly, aren’t that good.
Do we really need to be including the ninth-best team in the Big East, or the tenth-best in the ACC?
And, once you add on to the 65-team total, where does it end?
If you expand the bracket to include 96 programs, teams 66, 67, 68 and 69 that were on the outside looking in before would now be safely in, but all that does is ensure that teams 97, 98, 99 and 100 would take over the griping duties.
What about the importance of the regular season?
How can the NCAA say that one of the best things about college football is the fact that the BCS system as it’s currently set up emphasizes the regular season by ensuring every game matters, and then turn around and institute a tournament so big and forgiving in basketball that the best teams are allowed ten or twelve bad games without any measure of consequence?
You think the country’s best teams would give their all every night knowing they were already a lock for the postseason in mid-January?
So called late-season “Bracket Buster” games won’t have nearly the significance, and early-season non-conference games won’t be the resume builders or breakers that they are now.
I get that there are more teams playing Division I basketball than ever, and that more of those teams that are competing are doing so at a higher level.
But in my eyes, that just makes the regular season and conference tournaments that much more exciting.
The NCAA finally got one right in March Madness – expanding things now would be just plain mad.