banner
Ken Medlin

A tale of two draft strategies

Posted April 9, 2011

Each year around this time, I'm reminded of how Major League Baseball gets it right in one key area - draft eligibility.

While there have been exceptions, baseball's system essentially boils down to two options: 1) Go pro straight out of high school, or 2) Wait until your junior season in college has been completed.

The NBA could learn a lot from this model. If nothing else, we could avoid the yearly "should he stay or should he go" questions for college basketball's best.

Admittedly, few baseball prospects are "Majors-ready" coming out of high school in the way their basketball-playing counterparts have been. But the money and opportunities are certainly there for the top prospects. The only barrier to entry for a high school baseball player is the lack of interest from pro baseball teams. If they're interested, you can sign and pursue a career.

For those players that choose the college option, they're eligible for the draft three years later. It's a clean and neat solution that virtually guarantees a steady stream of talent going into pro baseball, but it also provides stability for college programs. Once a player arrives on campus, he's there for three seasons at least.

Why not investigate a similar system for basketball? Lately, we've heard a lot of talk about the NBA tweaking its draft rules to prevent players from leaving college after only one season. This "two-and-done" system would essentially keep elite players in college through their sophomore seasons.

For the NBA, this is a win-win scenario. Teams would get an extra two years of scouting -- plus free development from the elite players, thus minimizing the risk of draft-day mistakes. Plus, the top players would enter the league pre-marketed. Imagine how little we would have known about Kevin Durant had he not played his one season at Texas. He came in to the NBA as a household name.

My one issue with this system is a philosophical one. I'm bothered a bit by the idea that elite players would essentially be barred from working (for gazillions of dollars in the NBA) for two years. I do think that if your skills are in demand, you should have the right to market yourself. That's where baseball has it right. MLB gives high school stars the option of going pro. It's their choice.

But that's not likely to happen with the NBA, and frankly I doubt baseball would be as eager to sign high school players if their skill levels warranted promotions straight to the big leagues. It's less of a risk to draft a 20-year-old than an 18-year-old, if for no other reason than you've had two extra years to observe and scout them.

In the end, I wouldn't be surprised if the 2-year-rule becomes reality. And as someone who follows the college game a lot more closely than the pros i say bring it on -- even with the misgivings.

2 Comments

Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Lost and Loaded Apr 12, 2011

    I think it's long overdue for the NBA and the NCAA to institute a similar policy that MLB uses.
    The NBA now has a very strong development league to nurture those high school athletes who may not be quite ready for primetime in the senior league, yet still possess marketable skills that make them a draft target. The major NCAA schools are really having a hard time retaining quality recruits past their breakout year and yet recruiting them has not gotten any easier. The choice between going to the NBA out of high school and the option to play college ball for a minimum of 2-3 years is a fair one. Using the univ/NCAA to build your NBA marketability for just one year is not fair to the schools at all.

  • Ken D. Apr 9, 2011

    Did you really post this story at 4AM? There are things you can take for that.

    I pretty much agree with you, and I doubt that the NBA will work cooperatively with the NCAA to help provide stability to the college game, even though I think the NBA would benefit as much as the schools do, if not more.

    I've wondered whether there is something the NCAA could do on its own to improve their position. For example, would it be possible, from a legal standpoint, for schools to enter into a binding contract with recruits that requires them to stay in school for two or three years instead of one? Perhaps a provision could be made to allow the recruit to buy his way out of the contract if he decides to go pro early (which would obviously minimize the incentive to do just that).

    Of course that requires a quid pro quo from the school, which would likewise have to commit to the student that his scholarship is for at least as long as he is required to stay in school (and academically eligible).

    The current system as it now stands hurts one party (the schools) and only marginally helps the other (the NBA). Surely we could do better through cooperation.

  • Hoops Headquarters: Run for Redemption

    Friday at 7:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • Premier League Soccer: Southampton vs. Bournemouth

    Saturday at 12:30 pm on WRAL-TV

  • Golf: Shell Houston Open

    Saturday at 3:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • World Figure Skating Championships

    Saturday at 8:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • NHL: Boston @ Chicago

    Sunday at 12:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • NASL: NCFC at San Francisco

    Saturday, Apr. 8 at 10:00 pm on WRAL-2

  • NASL: NCFC vs. Edmonton

    Saturday, Apr. 15 at 7:30 pm on WRAL-2

  • NASL: NCFC @ Miami

    Saturday, Apr. 22 at 7:30 pm on WRAL-2

  • NHL: Canes v. Columbus

    Tomorrow at 7:00 pm on 99.9 The Fan

  • NASL: NCFC at San Francisco

    Saturday, Apr. 8 at 10:00 pm

  • NASL: NCFC vs. Edmonton

    Saturday, Apr. 15 at 7:30 pm

  • NASL: NCFC at Miami

    Saturday, Apr. 22 at 7:30 pm

NBA Scoreboard
Oklahoma City 4:00 PT5:00 MT6:00 CT7:00 ET23:00 GMT7:00 4:00 MST6:00 EST3:00 UAE (+1)01:0019:00 ET6:00 CTNaN:�
Preview
Orlando 
Atlanta 4:00 PT5:00 MT6:00 CT7:00 ET23:00 GMT7:00 4:00 MST6:00 EST3:00 UAE (+1)01:0019:00 ET6:00 CTNaN:�
Preview
Philadelphia 
Milwaukee 4:30 PT5:30 MT6:30 CT7:30 ET23:30 GMT7:30 4:30 MST6:30 EST3:30 UAE (+1)01:3019:30 ET6:30 CTNaN:�
Preview
Boston 
Miami 4:30 PT5:30 MT6:30 CT7:30 ET23:30 GMT7:30 4:30 MST6:30 EST3:30 UAE (+1)01:3019:30 ET6:30 CTNaN:�
Preview
New York 
Charlotte 4:30 PT5:30 MT6:30 CT7:30 ET23:30 GMT7:30 4:30 MST6:30 EST3:30 UAE (+1)01:3019:30 ET6:30 CTNaN:�
Preview
Toronto 
Dallas 5:00 PT6:00 MT7:00 CT8:00 ET0:00 GMT8:00 5:00 MST7:00 EST4:00 UAE (+1)02:0020:00 ET7:00 CTNaN:�
Preview
New Orleans 
Indiana 5:00 PT6:00 MT7:00 CT8:00 ET0:00 GMT8:00 5:00 MST7:00 EST4:00 UAE (+1)02:0020:00 ET7:00 CTNaN:�
Preview
Memphis 
Golden State 6:30 PT7:30 MT8:30 CT9:30 ET1:30 GMT9:30 6:30 MST8:30 EST5:30 UAE (+1)03:3021:30 ET8:30 CTNaN:�
Preview
San Antonio 
Washington 7:30 PT8:30 MT9:30 CT10:30 ET2:30 GMT10:30 7:30 MST9:30 EST6:30 UAE (+1)04:3022:30 ET9:30 CTNaN:�
Preview
LA Clippers 
Utah 7:30 PT8:30 MT9:30 CT10:30 ET2:30 GMT10:30 7:30 MST9:30 EST6:30 UAE (+1)04:3022:30 ET9:30 CTNaN:�
Preview
Sacramento 
NHL Scoreboard
Chicago 5:00 PT6:00 MT7:00 CT8:00 ET0:00 GMT8:00 5:00 MST7:00 EST4:00 UAE (+1)20:00 ETNaN:� BRT
Preview
Pittsburgh 
Los Angeles 6:00 PT7:00 MT8:00 CT9:00 ET1:00 GMT9:00 6:00 MST8:00 EST5:00 UAE (+1)21:00 ETNaN:� BRT
Preview
Calgary 
Washington 7:00 PT8:00 MT9:00 CT10:00 ET2:00 GMT10:00 7:00 MST9:00 EST6:00 UAE (+1)22:00 ETNaN:� BRT
Preview
Colorado 
St. Louis 7:30 PT8:30 MT9:30 CT10:30 ET2:30 GMT10:30 7:30 MST9:30 EST6:30 UAE (+1)22:30 ETNaN:� BRT
Preview
Arizona 
MLB Spring Training
Cactus
San Diego2Top
1st
Chi White Sox0
Texas0Bot
1st
Kansas City0
LA Angels4Top
1st
Milwaukee0
Cleveland0Top
1st
Cincinnati0
Oakland 1:05 PT2:05 MT3:05 CT4:05 ET16:05 ET20:05 GMT4:05 1:05 MST3:05 EST3:35 VEN0:05 UAE (+1)3:05 CT
Chi Cubs 
LA Dodgers 1:10 PT2:10 MT3:10 CT4:10 ET16:10 ET20:10 GMT4:10 1:10 MST3:10 EST3:40 VEN0:10 UAE (+1)3:10 CT
Seattle 
Grapefruit
Washington2Final
St. Louis6
Minnesota3Bot
7th
Boston3
Philadelphia(ss)5Bot
5th
Detroit2
NY Mets1Bot
8th
Atlanta2
Miami2Bot
7th
Houston2
Philadelphia(ss)4Bot
8th
Pittsburgh1
Baltimore2Bot
5th
Tampa Bay2
NY Yankees3Bot
7th
Toronto1
Minor League Baseball
International League
Rochester 11:05 PT12:05 MT1:05 CT2:05 ET7:05 GMT
Syracuse 
Scranton/Wilkes-Barre 11:05 PT12:05 MT1:05 CT2:05 ET7:05 GMT
Buffalo 
Pawtucket 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET12:05 GMT
Lehigh Valley 
Toledo 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET12:05 GMT
Indianapolis 
Norfolk 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET12:05 GMT
Charlotte 
Columbus 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET12:05 GMT
Louisville 
Durham 4:05 PT5:05 MT6:05 CT7:05 ET12:05 GMT
Gwinnett 
Puerto Rico Open (PGA)
PosNameScoreThru
1D. Points-20F
2tR. Goosen-18F
2tB. DeChambeau-18F
2tB. Lunde-18F
5tS. Saunders-17F
5tP. Uihlein-17F
5tW. Kim-17F
8tJ. Henry-16F
8tC. Stroud-16F
10tM. Flores-15F
View Full Leaderboard
 
Kia Classic (LPGA)
PosNameScoreThru
1M. Lee-20F
2tA. Ernst-14F
2tS. Ryu-14F
4tM. Hur-12F
4tK. Icher-12F
4tC. Kerr-12F
4tS. Park-12F
4tG. Piller-12F
9S. Feng-11F
10I. Chun-10F
View Full Leaderboard
 
WGC Match Play (EURO)
Leader in BOLD/CAPS
MatchHScore
JOHNSON v Rahm181 up
Tanihara v HAAS172 and 1
View Full Leaderboard
 
ATP Scoreboard
Wednesday, Mar. 29
Miami Open (ATP/WTA)
Quarterfinals
(2) K. Nishikori 
F. Fognini 
(5) R. Nadal 
(13) J. Sock 
 
WTA Scoreboard
Wednesday, Mar. 29
Miami Open (ATP/WTA)
Quarterfinals
(3) S. Halep6 67 1   
(10) J. Konta3 79 0   
(1) A. Kerber 
(11) V. Williams