banner
Ken Medlin

A tale of two draft strategies

Posted April 9, 2011

Each year around this time, I'm reminded of how Major League Baseball gets it right in one key area - draft eligibility.

While there have been exceptions, baseball's system essentially boils down to two options: 1) Go pro straight out of high school, or 2) Wait until your junior season in college has been completed.

The NBA could learn a lot from this model. If nothing else, we could avoid the yearly "should he stay or should he go" questions for college basketball's best.

Admittedly, few baseball prospects are "Majors-ready" coming out of high school in the way their basketball-playing counterparts have been. But the money and opportunities are certainly there for the top prospects. The only barrier to entry for a high school baseball player is the lack of interest from pro baseball teams. If they're interested, you can sign and pursue a career.

For those players that choose the college option, they're eligible for the draft three years later. It's a clean and neat solution that virtually guarantees a steady stream of talent going into pro baseball, but it also provides stability for college programs. Once a player arrives on campus, he's there for three seasons at least.

Why not investigate a similar system for basketball? Lately, we've heard a lot of talk about the NBA tweaking its draft rules to prevent players from leaving college after only one season. This "two-and-done" system would essentially keep elite players in college through their sophomore seasons.

For the NBA, this is a win-win scenario. Teams would get an extra two years of scouting -- plus free development from the elite players, thus minimizing the risk of draft-day mistakes. Plus, the top players would enter the league pre-marketed. Imagine how little we would have known about Kevin Durant had he not played his one season at Texas. He came in to the NBA as a household name.

My one issue with this system is a philosophical one. I'm bothered a bit by the idea that elite players would essentially be barred from working (for gazillions of dollars in the NBA) for two years. I do think that if your skills are in demand, you should have the right to market yourself. That's where baseball has it right. MLB gives high school stars the option of going pro. It's their choice.

But that's not likely to happen with the NBA, and frankly I doubt baseball would be as eager to sign high school players if their skill levels warranted promotions straight to the big leagues. It's less of a risk to draft a 20-year-old than an 18-year-old, if for no other reason than you've had two extra years to observe and scout them.

In the end, I wouldn't be surprised if the 2-year-rule becomes reality. And as someone who follows the college game a lot more closely than the pros i say bring it on -- even with the misgivings.

2 Comments

This blogpost is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • scousler Apr 12, 6:53 p.m.

    I think it's long overdue for the NBA and the NCAA to institute a similar policy that MLB uses.
    The NBA now has a very strong development league to nurture those high school athletes who may not be quite ready for primetime in the senior league, yet still possess marketable skills that make them a draft target. The major NCAA schools are really having a hard time retaining quality recruits past their breakout year and yet recruiting them has not gotten any easier. The choice between going to the NBA out of high school and the option to play college ball for a minimum of 2-3 years is a fair one. Using the univ/NCAA to build your NBA marketability for just one year is not fair to the schools at all.

  • Ken D. Apr 9, 12:57 p.m.

    Did you really post this story at 4AM? There are things you can take for that.

    I pretty much agree with you, and I doubt that the NBA will work cooperatively with the NCAA to help provide stability to the college game, even though I think the NBA would benefit as much as the schools do, if not more.

    I've wondered whether there is something the NCAA could do on its own to improve their position. For example, would it be possible, from a legal standpoint, for schools to enter into a binding contract with recruits that requires them to stay in school for two or three years instead of one? Perhaps a provision could be made to allow the recruit to buy his way out of the contract if he decides to go pro early (which would obviously minimize the incentive to do just that).

    Of course that requires a quid pro quo from the school, which would likewise have to commit to the student that his scholarship is for at least as long as he is required to stay in school (and academically eligible).

    The current system as it now stands hurts one party (the schools) and only marginally helps the other (the NBA). Surely we could do better through cooperation.

  • HSFB: Football Friday with Tom Suiter

    Tonight at 11:35 on WRAL-TV

  • ACC: NC State at UNC

    Tomorrow at 12:58 pm on WRAL-TV

  • SEC: Mississippi State at Ole Miss

    Tomorrow at 3:30 pm on WRAL-TV

  • NFL: San Diego at Baltimore

    Sunday at 1:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • HSFB: Millbrook at Wake Forest

    Tonight at 7:30 on 620am

  • CFB: NC State at UNC

    Tomorrow at 12:30 pm on WRAL-FM

Scoreboard
Local
Final
NCCU 65
EILL 40
 
1st
NCSU 3
BSU 5
 
1st
PIT 0
CAR 0
 
1st
CHA 4
GSW 5
 
8:00pm Tonight
UF
UNC
8:30pm Tonight
TULSA
ECU
Final
BOS 102
CHI 109
1st
CHA 4
GSW 5
 
7:30pm Tonight
TOR
DAL
7:30pm Tonight
DET
MIL
7:30pm Tonight
ATL
NOP
8:00pm Tonight
HOU
LAC
8:00pm Tonight
OKC
NYK
8:00pm Tonight
IND
ORL
8:30pm Tonight
SAN
SAC
9:00pm Tonight
DEN
PHO
10:00pm Tonight
POR
MEM
10:30pm Tonight
LAL
MIN
Final
WMICH 21
NILL 31
Final
SMU 9
HOU 35
Final
IOWA 34
NEB 37
Final
SFLA 0
UCF 16
Final
MARS 66
WKENT 67
Final
KSU 27
AKR 24
Final
BGU 24
BST 41
Final
UMASS 21
BUF 41
Final
EMICH 16
TOL 52
Final
MIZZ 21
ARK 14
Final
SALABAMA 40
NAVY 42
 
Final
ARZ 42
ARST 35
 
Final
AFA 27
COLST 24
 
Final
UCLA 10
STAN 31
8:00pm Tonight
VT
UVA
8:30pm Tonight
TULSA
ECU
Final
NCCU 65
EILL 40
 
Final
KU 82
TENN 67
Final
TEXAM 87
NO 65
 
Final
NCAT 57
RAD 65
 
Final
GEOR 58
BUT 64
Final
BRO 81
PVU 71
Final
RIU 66
SCU 44
Final
NARZ 70
SOUTH 63
Final
DART 68
MAST 67
Final
WRST 59
FIU 61
Final
XAV 73
UTEP 77
Final
OSU 73
JMU 56
Final
TXSOU 71
LAM 56
 
Final
TAMCC 75
MVSU 66
 
Final
AKAN 51
MIZST 55
Final
BUCK 80
PSU 88
 
Final
PROV 72
YALE 66
Final
UGA 62
MINN 66
 
Final
WISC 69
OKLA 56
 
1st OT
Terriers 70
NORST 72
 
Final
PEAY 62
STEPH 83
 
2nd
FSU 29
CSOU 17
 
2nd
VALPO 41
DRAK 26
 
2nd
CIN 47
MTST 22
 
2nd
SDU 48
PRIN 36
 
Half
WASU 39
RICE 33
 
Half
CSFU 36
USCU 33
 
1st
GT 25
RIDE 21
 
1st
TXPA 17
ALAST 19
 
1st
NCSU 3
BSU 5
 
1st
TCU 0
BRAD 2
 
1st
WAKE 7
DELST 10
 
1st
HART 8
EMERSON 0
 
1st
STJ 2
GONZ 2
 
1st
CLEM 2
HIGH 0
 
1st
SYR 4
HC 2
 
1st
MD 11
MON 5
 
1st
JVST 10
SAV 8
 
1st
MIAMI 4
SALA 0
 
1st
RUTG 8
VANDY 8
 
7:30pm Tonight
PETE
TENST
8:00pm Tonight
MARS
CLST
8:00pm Tonight
JST
HOF
 
8:00pm Tonight
INDST
MEM
8:00pm Tonight
UF
UNC
8:00pm Tonight
LATU
SAMF
8:00pm Tonight
TULA
SELA
 
8:00pm Tonight
NEB
TENNM
8:30pm Tonight
MISS
CREI
8:30pm Tonight
PORT
MURST
9:00pm Tonight
MARQ
MSU
9:00pm Tonight
ARK
UNT
9:00pm Tonight
NCOL
STET
 
9:00pm Tonight
IND
UNCG
9:00pm Tonight
SJST
WMICH
9:05pm Tonight
MNTST
TXARL
9:30pm Tonight
UVA
LAS
9:30pm Tonight
STLU
MSST
9:30pm Tonight
COLST
PAC
10:00pm Tonight
UTAH
NDAK
10:30pm Tonight
ILL
BAY
10:30pm Tonight
UAB
UCLA
11:30pm Tonight
WASH
LBSU
11:59pm Tonight
UCSB
MERC
Final
PHI 0
NYR 3
Final
ANA 1
CHI 4
3rd
WAS 4
NYI 2
 
1st
PIT 0
CAR 0
 
1st
NJD 0
DET 0
 
1st
BUF 0
MON 0
 
1st
CLB 0
VAN 0
 
1st
BOS 0
WIN 0
 
7:30pm Tonight
FLA
OTT
8:00pm Tonight
STL
EDM
8:30pm Tonight
DAL
MIN