North Carolina

Willingham: Lack of educating student-athletes needs to change

Posted January 16, 2014

Mary Willingham, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill adviser who claimed the UNC system is failing to help student-athletes receive an education, said Thursday that she believes the same thing happens at universities all over the country and is advocating for change.

“You have to have a system of eligibility. If you have a bunch of players that can’t do that work, you have to somehow get them eligible,” said Willingham told Adam Gold and Joe Ovies on 99.9FM The Fan Thursday.

Willingham called the system of eligibility at North Carolina ‘paper classes’ where student-athletes did not have to attend class.

The adviser said she has received nearly a thousand emails from people confessing that they know about these systems and are aware about them happening at their own schools.

“We need to stop it. It needs to end because, bottom line, these young men that entertain us on game day are not getting what we’re promising them – a real education. And that should make all of us very, very angry,” Willingham said.

Willingham said she hopes people will step up and feel comfortable about doing it, but the real change may not occur without the voice of the former student-athletes themselves.

“We’re fighting a multi-million dollar machine – the NCAA. And people are afraid,” said Willingham. “Maybe [athletes will] stand up themselves or maybe they’ll sit down on the hardwood floor and say, ‘We’re not going to take this anymore. Enough already.’

“I’d like the think that we’re smart enough in this country to try and figure out how to do the right thing for these young people… maybe it’s going to be some sort of change in the system completely,” she said.

Willingham said she does not have the answers for the big picture but knows that at North Carolina it’s to teach the young players literacy skills and how to be successful in the classroom as well as on the field.

“That’s what we’re promising them, and that’s what we’re trying to do,” said Willingham.

Willingham works in the UNC Center for Student Success and Academic Counseling. From 2003 to 2010, she helped athletes in the Academic Support Program for Student-Athletes. During the course of her work, both as a UNC graduate student and employee, Willingham researched how university admission standards are applied to athletes in the high-profile, revenue-driving sports of men's football and basketball and found that that 60 percent of the 183 athletes she studied read at a level more common in elementary school and up to 10 percent had the reading skills of a third grader.

Willingham said that she has never been contacted by the NCAA to share her findings even though she presented them to the general counsel in 2010, Governor Martin in 2012 and the provost Dean when he arrived last summer.

“Because I know too much. What are they going to do with me when I show them my data, when I tell them the truth, shut the whole thing down?” Willingham questioned.

2 Comments

Please to add a comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • vply2000 Jan 18, 2014

    PROVOST CLEARS UP REMARKS

    At the faculty council meeting Friday, UNC Provost Jim Dean said News & Observer staff writer Dan Kane misquoted him in a story on the controversy in Saturday’s paper. He also said that Kane did not respond to his request for a correction.

    After the meeting, Dean admitted that no one at UNC contacted The N&O to seek a correction. He apologized to Kane and also said UNC would issue a statement to the media reflecting that.

    Dean said that he was misquoted when The N&O reported that Dean thinks the scandal was not about athletics because nonathletes made up 55 percent of the total enrollments. Kane’s notes of the interview reflect Dean noting that most of the students who benefited were nonathletes.

    Dean said Friday that his position is this: “We did not have any evidence that these courses were initiated in order to benefit athletes. ... I didn’t even say that they weren’t. I said we don’t have any evidence that’s true.”

    Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/01/17/3542148/unc-leaders-say-mary-willinghams.html#storylink=cpy

  • Objective Scientist Jan 18, 2014

    Scholastic Abilities Test for Adults: The SATA Test that is "at issue". The test to which Willingham refers that UNC administrators "dispute" as a measure of reading and academic preparedness:

    Ages: 16 through 70
    Testing Time: 1 to 2 hours
    Administration: Individual or group
    The SATA measures the scholastic competence of persons from the ages of 16 through 70. Subtest raw scores are converted to estimated grade equivalents, standard scores (M = 10, SD = 3), and percentiles. The SATA's aptitude and achievement components can provide an aptitude-achievement discrepancy analysis needed for LD placement. The SATA was normed on 1,005 persons residing in 17 states, and the sample is representative of the nation as a whole with regard to gender, race, ethnicity, urban/rural residence, and geographic region. The SATA is technically sound, with reliabilities generally in the .80s and .90s. Reliabilities of that magnitude are generally regarded as "Very good - Excellent".

  • ACC: Syracuse at NC State

    Saturday at 12:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • SEC: Florida at Kentucky

    Saturday at 2:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • Pac 12: Stanford at Arizona

    Saturday at 4:00 pm on WRAL-TV

  • NHL: Hurricanes vs. Minnesota

    Tomorrow at 8:00 pm on 99.9 The Fan

Scoreboard
Local
Final
ECU 56
TEMPL 70
Final
NCCU 69
NCAT 58
 
Final
DET 4
ATL 6
 
Final
TAM 2
BAL 3
 
Final
PIT 1
NYY 2
 
Final
HOU 6
PHI 3
 
Final
MIA 1
STL 4
 
Final
SFG 8
CHC 6
 
Final
CIN 3
CLE 9
 
Final
CWS 1
LOS 6
 
Final
ANA 3
MIL 2
 
Final
CHC 2
OAK 2
 
Final
SEA 9
SDP 4
 
Final
KAN 5
TEX 4
 
Final
ARI 4
COL 3
 
Final
WAS 5
NYM 4
 
Final
MIN 9
BOS 8
 
Final
BAL 5
TOR 0
 
Final
CHI 108
OKC 105
 
1st
POR 13
DAL 12
 
Final
MDES 89
MRGST 76
 
Final
SIENA 71
NIAG 54
Final
LEH 62
AMER 68
 
Final
SCAR 74
ARK 78
Final
LAF 89
BU 64
 
Final
PETE 63
FAIR 33
Final
BUCK 90
HC 83
 
Final
UNF 71
LIP 57
 
Final
TENNM 65
MORE 76
Final
COL 72
NAVY 62
 
Final
ECU 56
TEMPL 70
Final
FATL 62
UAB 59
 
Final
FLGC 62
USCU 63
 
Final
CHAR 84
WKENT 88
 
Final
MINN 63
WISC 76
Final
MIZST 48
SILL 55
Final
COPST 92
DELST 104
 
Final
FIU 59
MTST 54
Final
HAMP 69
NORST 80
 
Final
NCCU 69
NCAT 58
 
Final
COOK 72
SCST 62
 
Final
APP 67
TXST 64
 
Final
GSOUT 76
TXARL 64
 
Final
LAMON 50
UGST 58
 
Final
ODU 67
MARS 50
Final
TXSA 74
RICE 76
 
Final
FAM 64
SAV 57
 
Final
LATU 72
SMISS 61
 
Final
JST 72
ALAAM 54
 
Final
GRAM 46
ALAST 70
 
Final
TXSOU 94
ALCOR 73
 
Final
NICST 77
CARK 70
 
Final
TAMCC 85
HOUB 72
 
Final
NARZ 58
PORST 51
 
2nd
LAM 56
SHSU 66
 
Final
ARKST 76
SALA 81
 
2nd
PVU 63
SOUTH 65
 
Final
LALAF 75
ARKLR 69
 
2nd
NO 79
SELA 75
 
2nd
INCWORD 58
ABCHRIST 46
 
9:00pm Tonight
MVSU 0
ARKPB 0
 
2nd
ARZ 83
CAL 47
 
Final
WASH 47
COL 64
 
2nd
WEBER 72
IDAHO 61
 
2nd
UCONN 53
MEM 52
 
Final
UTEP 83
UNT 60
 
2nd
STEPH 92
NWST 63
 
Final
SUTAH 69
SACST 65
 
2nd
DAVID 71
VCU 49
 
2nd
IDST 79
EWASH 83
 
2nd
QUIN 58
MAR 63
 
2nd
BEL 84
EILL 55
 
2nd
DRAK 31
BRAD 31
 
Half
LBSU 30
CSNO 25
 
Half
UCI 25
CSFU 22
 
Half
UCD 25
UCR 30
 
11:00pm Tonight
ARST
STAN
11:00pm Tonight
WASU
UTAH
Final
BOS 3
CAL 4
Final
WAS 1
MIN 2
Final
PHI 3
STL 1
Final
FLA 3
DAL 4
Final
TAM 4
TOR 2
Final
NAS 3
NYI 4
 
2nd Intermission
ARI 1
VAN 0
 
1st
LOS 2
MON 0